Factors influencing the total procedure time of CT-guided percutaneous core-needle biopsies of lung nodules: a retrospective analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Tyler Sargent, Nathan Kolderman, Girish B Nair, Michelle Jankowski, Sayf Al-Katib
{"title":"Factors influencing the total procedure time of CT-guided percutaneous core-needle biopsies of lung nodules: a retrospective analysis.","authors":"Tyler Sargent,&nbsp;Nathan Kolderman,&nbsp;Girish B Nair,&nbsp;Michelle Jankowski,&nbsp;Sayf Al-Katib","doi":"10.5152/dir.2022.20731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PURPOSE This study aims to investigate the factors that influence total procedure time when performing computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous core-needle lung biopsies. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study of 673 patients, who underwent a CT-guided percutaneous coreneedle biopsy at a tertiary care center from March 2014 to August 2016. Data on patient, nodule, and procedural factors and outcomes were collected retrospectively. Univariate linear regression and a multivariate stepwise linear regression were utilized for analysis. RESULTS Factors most strongly associated with prolonged procedure duration include 20-gauge needle use when compared with 18-gauge needle use (estimated difference in time=1.19), collecting additional core biopsies (estimated difference in time=1.10), decubitus nodule side up (DNSU; estimated difference in time=1.42), and supine positioning (estimated difference in time=1.16) relative to decubitus nodule side down positioning, and increased nodule distance from the skin surface (estimated difference in time=1.03). Increased nodule length (estimated difference in time=0.93) was associated with reductions in procedure duration. Prolonged procedure time was associated with an increased rate of pneumothorax (odds ratio (OR)=1.02; P < .0001) and decreased rate of pulmonary hemorrhage (OR=0.97; P < .0001). CONCLUSION The use of 20-gauge biopsy needle, collecting additional core biopsies, DNSU and supine positioning, smaller nodule size, and increasing nodule distance from the skin surface were associated with increased procedure time for CT-guided core needle biopsies of lung nodules. Prolonged procedure time is associated with a higher rate of pneumothorax and a lower rate of pulmonary hemorrhage.</p>","PeriodicalId":50582,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"337-343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9634926/pdf/dir-28-4-337.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2022.20731","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE This study aims to investigate the factors that influence total procedure time when performing computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous core-needle lung biopsies. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study of 673 patients, who underwent a CT-guided percutaneous coreneedle biopsy at a tertiary care center from March 2014 to August 2016. Data on patient, nodule, and procedural factors and outcomes were collected retrospectively. Univariate linear regression and a multivariate stepwise linear regression were utilized for analysis. RESULTS Factors most strongly associated with prolonged procedure duration include 20-gauge needle use when compared with 18-gauge needle use (estimated difference in time=1.19), collecting additional core biopsies (estimated difference in time=1.10), decubitus nodule side up (DNSU; estimated difference in time=1.42), and supine positioning (estimated difference in time=1.16) relative to decubitus nodule side down positioning, and increased nodule distance from the skin surface (estimated difference in time=1.03). Increased nodule length (estimated difference in time=0.93) was associated with reductions in procedure duration. Prolonged procedure time was associated with an increased rate of pneumothorax (odds ratio (OR)=1.02; P < .0001) and decreased rate of pulmonary hemorrhage (OR=0.97; P < .0001). CONCLUSION The use of 20-gauge biopsy needle, collecting additional core biopsies, DNSU and supine positioning, smaller nodule size, and increasing nodule distance from the skin surface were associated with increased procedure time for CT-guided core needle biopsies of lung nodules. Prolonged procedure time is associated with a higher rate of pneumothorax and a lower rate of pulmonary hemorrhage.

影响ct引导下经皮肺结节穿刺活检总时间的因素:回顾性分析。
目的:本研究旨在探讨影响计算机断层扫描(CT)引导下经皮穿刺肺活检总手术时间的因素。方法:这是一项对673例患者的横断面研究,这些患者于2014年3月至2016年8月在三级医疗中心接受了ct引导下的经皮核心针活检。回顾性收集患者、结节、手术因素和结果的资料。采用单变量线性回归和多元逐步线性回归进行分析。与手术时间延长最密切相关的因素包括使用20号针头(与使用18号针头相比)(估计时间差异=1.19),收集额外的核心活检(估计时间差异=1.10),卧位结节侧上(DNSU;估计时间差=1.42),而仰卧位(估计时间差=1.16)相对于卧位结节侧下位,且结节距皮肤表面距离增加(估计时间差=1.03)。结节长度增加(估计时间差异=0.93)与手术时间缩短相关。延长手术时间与气胸发生率增加相关(优势比(OR)=1.02;P < 0.0001),肺出血发生率降低(OR=0.97;P < 0.0001)。结论使用20号活检针、额外采集核心活检、DNSU和仰卧位、较小的结节大小、增加结节与皮肤表面的距离与ct引导下肺结节核心活检时间增加有关。延长手术时间与较高的气胸发生率和较低的肺出血发生率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English. The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信