Warren J McIsaac, Arrani Senthinathan, Rahim Moineddin, Yoshiko Nakamachi, Linda Dresser, Mark McIntyre, Suzanne Singh, Nelia De Oliveira, David Tannenbaum, Jeff Bloom, Camille Lemieux, Patricia Marr, Michelle Levy, Mira Mitri, Sakina Walji, Sahana Kukan, Andrew M Morris
{"title":"Development and evaluation of a primary care antimicrobial stewardship program (PC-ASP) in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.","authors":"Warren J McIsaac, Arrani Senthinathan, Rahim Moineddin, Yoshiko Nakamachi, Linda Dresser, Mark McIntyre, Suzanne Singh, Nelia De Oliveira, David Tannenbaum, Jeff Bloom, Camille Lemieux, Patricia Marr, Michelle Levy, Mira Mitri, Sakina Walji, Sahana Kukan, Andrew M Morris","doi":"10.3138/jammi-2020-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective community-based antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are needed because 90% of antimicrobials are prescribed in the community. A primary care ASP (PC-ASP) was evaluated for its effectiveness in lowering antibiotic prescriptions for six common infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-faceted educational program was assessed using a before-and-after design in four primary care clinics from 2015 through 2017. The primary outcome was the difference between control and intervention clinics in total antibiotic prescriptions for six common infections before and after the intervention. Secondary outcomes included changes in condition-specific antibiotic use, delayed antibiotic prescriptions, prescriptions exceeding 7 days duration, use of recommended antibiotics, and emergency department visits or hospitalizations within 30 days. Multi-method models adjusting for demographics, case mix, and clustering by physician were used to estimate treatment effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total antibiotic prescriptions in control and intervention clinics did not differ (difference in differences = 1.7%; 95% CI -12.5% to 15.9%), nor did use of delayed prescriptions (-5.2%; 95% CI -24.2% to 13.8%). Prescriptions for longer than 7 days were significantly reduced (-21.3%; 95% CI -42.5% to -0.1%). However, only 781 of 1,777 encounters (44.0%) involved providers who completed the ASP education. Where providers completed the education, delayed prescriptions increased 17.7% (<i>p</i> = 0.06), and prescriptions exceeding 7 days duration declined (-27%; 95% CI -48.3% to -5.6%). Subsequent emergency department visits and hospitalizations did not increase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PC-ASP effectiveness on antibiotic use was variable. Shorter prescription durations and increased use of delayed prescriptions were adopted by engaged primary care providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":36782,"journal":{"name":"JAMMI","volume":"6 1","pages":"32-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612432/pdf/jammi-2020-0021.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMMI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jammi-2020-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Background: Effective community-based antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are needed because 90% of antimicrobials are prescribed in the community. A primary care ASP (PC-ASP) was evaluated for its effectiveness in lowering antibiotic prescriptions for six common infections.
Methods: A multi-faceted educational program was assessed using a before-and-after design in four primary care clinics from 2015 through 2017. The primary outcome was the difference between control and intervention clinics in total antibiotic prescriptions for six common infections before and after the intervention. Secondary outcomes included changes in condition-specific antibiotic use, delayed antibiotic prescriptions, prescriptions exceeding 7 days duration, use of recommended antibiotics, and emergency department visits or hospitalizations within 30 days. Multi-method models adjusting for demographics, case mix, and clustering by physician were used to estimate treatment effects.
Results: Total antibiotic prescriptions in control and intervention clinics did not differ (difference in differences = 1.7%; 95% CI -12.5% to 15.9%), nor did use of delayed prescriptions (-5.2%; 95% CI -24.2% to 13.8%). Prescriptions for longer than 7 days were significantly reduced (-21.3%; 95% CI -42.5% to -0.1%). However, only 781 of 1,777 encounters (44.0%) involved providers who completed the ASP education. Where providers completed the education, delayed prescriptions increased 17.7% (p = 0.06), and prescriptions exceeding 7 days duration declined (-27%; 95% CI -48.3% to -5.6%). Subsequent emergency department visits and hospitalizations did not increase.
Conclusions: PC-ASP effectiveness on antibiotic use was variable. Shorter prescription durations and increased use of delayed prescriptions were adopted by engaged primary care providers.
背景:有效的社区抗菌素管理规划(asp)是必要的,因为90%的抗菌素是在社区开处方的。评估了初级保健ASP (PC-ASP)在降低六种常见感染的抗生素处方方面的有效性。方法:从2015年到2017年,采用前后设计对四家初级保健诊所的多方面教育计划进行评估。主要结果是对照组和干预诊所在干预前后对六种常见感染的总抗生素处方的差异。次要结局包括疾病特异性抗生素使用的变化、延迟抗生素处方、处方持续时间超过7天、推荐抗生素的使用以及30天内急诊室就诊或住院情况。采用多方法模型对人口统计学、病例组合和医师聚类进行调整,以估计治疗效果。结果:对照组和干预组临床总抗生素处方量差异无统计学意义(差异= 1.7%;95% CI -12.5%至15.9%),也没有使用延迟处方(-5.2%;95% CI -24.2%至13.8%)。超过7天的处方显著减少(-21.3%;95% CI -42.5%至-0.1%)。然而,在1777次接触中,只有781次(44.0%)涉及完成ASP教育的提供者。在提供者完成教育的地方,延迟处方增加了17.7% (p = 0.06),超过7天的处方减少了(-27%;95% CI -48.3%至-5.6%)。随后的急诊就诊和住院次数没有增加。结论:PC-ASP对抗生素使用效果的影响是可变的。参与的初级保健提供者采用了缩短处方持续时间和增加使用延迟处方的方法。