GPs' involvement in specialised palliative home care: A mixed methods study in Germany.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sophie Peter, Anna Maria Volkert, Lukas Radbruch, Roman Rolke, Raymond Voltz, Holger Pfaff, Nadine Scholten
{"title":"GPs' involvement in specialised palliative home care: A mixed methods study in Germany.","authors":"Sophie Peter,&nbsp;Anna Maria Volkert,&nbsp;Lukas Radbruch,&nbsp;Roman Rolke,&nbsp;Raymond Voltz,&nbsp;Holger Pfaff,&nbsp;Nadine Scholten","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2022.2139824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General practitioners (GPs) are important providers of palliative home care (PHC). To deliver adequate palliative care, cooperation with specialised PHC teams is necessary. Specialised PHC is a type of care for severely ill patients by specialised providers. Little is known about the involvement of German GPs in specialised PHC.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyse GPs' experience with realised and desired involvement in specialised PHC. Realised involvement means GPs took part in specialised PHC patients' care. Desired involvement is GPs' hoped-for cooperation with specialised PHC teams: GPs could state whether they want to stay involved, be informed, or provide medical services themselves after referral to specialised PHC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed methods design (focus group with 6 GPs; survey of 445 GPs in North Rhine, Germany, about their experiences in PHC/specialised PHC): Qualitative data was interpreted using content analysis. The authors developed a questionnaire and performed descriptive analysis based on qualitative results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GPs are mostly satisfied with specialised PHC teams' care, although they report cooperation is not always optimal. GPs describe a high satisfaction with quality of care by specialised PHC teams. However, physicians with higher PC knowledge are less satisfied with specialised PHC. Also, GPs are often less involved in specialised PHC than they wish, especially when they have a higher PC qualification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In general, GPs are satisfied with the quality of care provided by specialised PHC teams but GPs do not always perceive cooperation as optimal. Involvement of GPs in specialised PHC needs to be improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9665080/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2022.2139824","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: General practitioners (GPs) are important providers of palliative home care (PHC). To deliver adequate palliative care, cooperation with specialised PHC teams is necessary. Specialised PHC is a type of care for severely ill patients by specialised providers. Little is known about the involvement of German GPs in specialised PHC.

Objectives: To analyse GPs' experience with realised and desired involvement in specialised PHC. Realised involvement means GPs took part in specialised PHC patients' care. Desired involvement is GPs' hoped-for cooperation with specialised PHC teams: GPs could state whether they want to stay involved, be informed, or provide medical services themselves after referral to specialised PHC.

Methods: Mixed methods design (focus group with 6 GPs; survey of 445 GPs in North Rhine, Germany, about their experiences in PHC/specialised PHC): Qualitative data was interpreted using content analysis. The authors developed a questionnaire and performed descriptive analysis based on qualitative results.

Results: GPs are mostly satisfied with specialised PHC teams' care, although they report cooperation is not always optimal. GPs describe a high satisfaction with quality of care by specialised PHC teams. However, physicians with higher PC knowledge are less satisfied with specialised PHC. Also, GPs are often less involved in specialised PHC than they wish, especially when they have a higher PC qualification.

Conclusion: In general, GPs are satisfied with the quality of care provided by specialised PHC teams but GPs do not always perceive cooperation as optimal. Involvement of GPs in specialised PHC needs to be improved.

全科医生参与专业姑息家庭护理:在德国的混合方法研究。
背景:全科医生(gp)是姑息性家庭护理(PHC)的重要提供者。为了提供适当的姑息治疗,必须与专门的初级保健小组合作。专科初级保健是由专科提供者为重症患者提供的一种护理。人们对德国全科医生参与专门的初级保健所知甚少。目的:分析全科医生参与专业初级保健的经验。实现参与意味着全科医生参与专门的初级保健病人护理。期望参与是全科医生希望与专业初级保健团队的合作:全科医生可以声明他们是否希望继续参与,了解情况,或者在转诊到专业初级保健后自己提供医疗服务。方法:采用混合方法设计(6名GPs焦点组;对德国北莱茵地区445名全科医生进行的关于初级保健/专科初级保健经验的调查:采用内容分析对定性数据进行解释。作者制定了一份调查问卷,并在定性结果的基础上进行了描述性分析。结果:全科医生大多对专业初级保健团队的护理感到满意,尽管他们报告合作并不总是最佳的。全科医生对专业初级保健团队的护理质量表示高度满意。然而,具有较高PC知识的医生对专门的PHC不太满意。此外,全科医生通常不像他们希望的那样参与专门的初级保健,尤其是当他们拥有更高的初级保健资格时。结论:一般来说,全科医生对专业初级保健团队提供的护理质量感到满意,但全科医生并不总是认为合作是最佳的。全科医生参与专科初级保健的情况需要改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of General Practice
European Journal of General Practice PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The EJGP aims to: foster scientific research in primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice) in Europe stimulate education and debate, relevant for the development of primary care medicine in Europe. Scope The EJGP publishes original research papers, review articles and clinical case reports on all aspects of primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice), providing new knowledge on medical decision-making, healthcare delivery, medical education, and research methodology. Areas covered include primary care epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, non-drug interventions, multi- and comorbidity, palliative care, shared decision making, inter-professional collaboration, quality and safety, training and teaching, and quantitative and qualitative research methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信