Attitudes Toward and Experience With Assisted-Death Services and Psychological Implications for Health Practitioners: A Narrative Systematic Review.

Omega Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-10 DOI:10.1177/00302228221138997
Susilo Wibisono, Kiara Minto, Morgana Lizzio-Wilson, Emma F Thomas, Monique Crane, Pascal Molenberghs, Madison Kho, Catherine E Amiot, Jean Decety, Lauren J Breen, Kerrie Noonan, Liz Forbat, Winnifred Louis
{"title":"Attitudes Toward and Experience With Assisted-Death Services and Psychological Implications for Health Practitioners: A Narrative Systematic Review.","authors":"Susilo Wibisono, Kiara Minto, Morgana Lizzio-Wilson, Emma F Thomas, Monique Crane, Pascal Molenberghs, Madison Kho, Catherine E Amiot, Jean Decety, Lauren J Breen, Kerrie Noonan, Liz Forbat, Winnifred Louis","doi":"10.1177/00302228221138997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A narrative systematic review was conducted to review studies that examine mental health implications of involvement in assisted-death services among health practitioners. Qualitative and quantitative studies were included to understand health practitioners' attitudes and experiences with assisted dying services, as well as to identify the mental health consequences. We identified 18 articles from 1591 articles drawn from seven major scientific databases (i.e., PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus). Two raters independently evaluated the exclusion and inclusion decisions of the articles and examined methodological flaws in the selected articles. We found that engagement in assisted death services were not reliably associated with mental health outcomes such as anxiety and moral distress. Both positive and negative outcomes were reported, and psychological outcomes for practitioners were shown to vary based on factors including social support for health practitioners' views; their perceived capacity to care for the patients; and legislation.</p>","PeriodicalId":74338,"journal":{"name":"Omega","volume":" ","pages":"590-612"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228221138997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A narrative systematic review was conducted to review studies that examine mental health implications of involvement in assisted-death services among health practitioners. Qualitative and quantitative studies were included to understand health practitioners' attitudes and experiences with assisted dying services, as well as to identify the mental health consequences. We identified 18 articles from 1591 articles drawn from seven major scientific databases (i.e., PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus). Two raters independently evaluated the exclusion and inclusion decisions of the articles and examined methodological flaws in the selected articles. We found that engagement in assisted death services were not reliably associated with mental health outcomes such as anxiety and moral distress. Both positive and negative outcomes were reported, and psychological outcomes for practitioners were shown to vary based on factors including social support for health practitioners' views; their perceived capacity to care for the patients; and legislation.

对辅助死亡服务的态度和体验以及对医疗从业者的心理影响:叙述式系统综述》。
我们开展了一项叙事性系统综述,以审查有关医疗从业人员参与辅助死亡服务对心理健康影响的研究。我们纳入了定性和定量研究,以了解医疗从业人员对辅助死亡服务的态度和经验,并确定其对心理健康的影响。我们从 7 个主要科学数据库(即 PubMed、MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Embase、Web of Science 和 Scopus)的 1591 篇文章中筛选出 18 篇。两名评审员独立评估了文章的排除和纳入决定,并检查了所选文章在方法论上的缺陷。我们发现,参与协助死亡服务与焦虑和精神痛苦等心理健康结果的关系并不可靠。报告中既有积极的结果,也有消极的结果,从业人员的心理结果因各种因素而异,这些因素包括社会对医疗从业人员观点的支持、他们认为自己有能力照顾病人以及立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信