Can Variables From the Electronic Health Record Identify Delirium at Bedside?

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2022-07-18 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17294/2330-0698.1890
Ariba Khan, Kayla Heslin, Michelle Simpson, Michael L Malone
{"title":"Can Variables From the Electronic Health Record Identify Delirium at Bedside?","authors":"Ariba Khan,&nbsp;Kayla Heslin,&nbsp;Michelle Simpson,&nbsp;Michael L Malone","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.1890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Delirium, a common and serious disorder in older hospitalized patients, remains underrecognized. While several delirium predictive models have been developed, only a handful have focused on electronic health record (EHR) data. This prospective cohort study of older inpatients (≥65 years old) aimed to determine if variables within our health system's EHR could be used to identify delirium among hospitalized patients at the bedside. Trained researchers screened daily for delirium using the 3-minute diagnostic Confusion Assessment Method (3D-CAM). Patient demographic and clinical variables were extracted from the EHR. Among 408 participants, mean age was 75 years, 60.8% were female, and 82.6% were Black. Overall rate of delirium was 16.7%. Patients with delirium were older and more likely to have an infection diagnosis, prior dementia, higher Charlson comorbidity severity of illness score, lower Braden Scale score, and higher Morse Fall Scale score in the EHR (P<0.01 for all). On multivariable analysis, a prior diagnosis of dementia (odds ratio: 5.0, 95% CI: 2.5-10.3) and a Braden score of <18 (odds ratio: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.5-5.1) remained significantly associated with delirium among hospitalized patients. Further research in the development of an automated delirium prediction model is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":"9 3","pages":"174-180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302913/pdf/jpcrr-9.3.174.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Delirium, a common and serious disorder in older hospitalized patients, remains underrecognized. While several delirium predictive models have been developed, only a handful have focused on electronic health record (EHR) data. This prospective cohort study of older inpatients (≥65 years old) aimed to determine if variables within our health system's EHR could be used to identify delirium among hospitalized patients at the bedside. Trained researchers screened daily for delirium using the 3-minute diagnostic Confusion Assessment Method (3D-CAM). Patient demographic and clinical variables were extracted from the EHR. Among 408 participants, mean age was 75 years, 60.8% were female, and 82.6% were Black. Overall rate of delirium was 16.7%. Patients with delirium were older and more likely to have an infection diagnosis, prior dementia, higher Charlson comorbidity severity of illness score, lower Braden Scale score, and higher Morse Fall Scale score in the EHR (P<0.01 for all). On multivariable analysis, a prior diagnosis of dementia (odds ratio: 5.0, 95% CI: 2.5-10.3) and a Braden score of <18 (odds ratio: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.5-5.1) remained significantly associated with delirium among hospitalized patients. Further research in the development of an automated delirium prediction model is needed.

Abstract Image

电子健康记录的变量能识别床边的谵妄吗?
谵妄是老年住院患者中一种常见且严重的疾病,但仍未得到充分认识。虽然已经开发了几种谵妄预测模型,但只有少数模型专注于电子健康记录(EHR)数据。这项针对老年住院患者(≥65岁)的前瞻性队列研究旨在确定我们卫生系统电子病历中的变量是否可以用于识别床边住院患者的谵妄。训练有素的研究人员每天使用3分钟诊断混乱评估方法(3D-CAM)筛选谵妄。从电子病历中提取患者人口统计学和临床变量。在408名参与者中,平均年龄为75岁,60.8%为女性,82.6%为黑人。谵妄的总发生率为16.7%。谵妄患者年龄较大,更有可能有感染诊断、既往痴呆、较高的Charlson共病严重程度评分、较低的Braden量表评分和较高的Morse Fall量表评分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信