Comparison of Speckle Tracking Echocardiography During Different Pacing Modalities for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response Prediction.

IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Heart International Pub Date : 2022-06-01 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17925/HI.2022.16.1.64
Shai Tejman-Yarden, Dor Hadida Barzilai, Offir Ertracht, Noa Bachner-Heinenzon, Stephan Bogdan, Uriel Katz, Sumit Chatterji, Efrat Mazor Dray, Yoav Bolkier, Michael Glikson, Roy Beinart
{"title":"Comparison of Speckle Tracking Echocardiography During Different Pacing Modalities for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response Prediction.","authors":"Shai Tejman-Yarden,&nbsp;Dor Hadida Barzilai,&nbsp;Offir Ertracht,&nbsp;Noa Bachner-Heinenzon,&nbsp;Stephan Bogdan,&nbsp;Uriel Katz,&nbsp;Sumit Chatterji,&nbsp;Efrat Mazor Dray,&nbsp;Yoav Bolkier,&nbsp;Michael Glikson,&nbsp;Roy Beinart","doi":"10.17925/HI.2022.16.1.64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: The aim of this study was to evaluate left ventricular mechanical activation pattern by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure. <b>Methods</b>: Echocardiography was performed during no pacing, right ventricular pacing (RVP), biventricular pacing (BVP) and multipolar pacing (MPP) immediately after CRT implantation in 16 patients at a single centre. Seven patients were diagnosed as responders and 9 patients as non-responders after 6 months of standard CRT pacing. All had adequate short axis views, and 1 CRT responder and 2 CRT non-responders had limited longitudinal views. <b>Results</b>: Longitudinal and circumferential global strain (GS) and global strain rate (GSR) or their change analysis, did not yield any CRT response prediction. However, the longitudinal BVP/RVP GS ratio was significantly higher in the responder group (1.32 ± 0.2%, 2.0 ± 0.4% and 1.9 ± 0.4%), compared with the non-responder group (1.06 ± 0.2%, 1.1 ± 0.4% and 1.2 ± 0.4%) in the apical two-chamber, APLAX and four-chamber views, respectively. Similarly, the longitudinal BVP/RVP GSR at active systolic phase (GSRs) was significantly higher in the responder group (1.9 ± 0.9% and 1.7 ± 0.4%) compared with the non-responder group (1.0 ± 0.4% and 1.1 ± 0.2%) in the apical APLAX and four-chamber views, respectively. Measurements of the strain delay index showed predictive power regarding CRT response in non-paced patients. <b>Conclusion</b>: Post implantation, longitudinal BVP/RVP GS and GSRs ratios of 1.4% and above may be useful as a CRT response prediction tool. Furthermore, our findings support the usefulness of strain delay index prior to CRT implantation in non-paced patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12836,"journal":{"name":"Heart International","volume":"16 1","pages":"64-70"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524619/pdf/heart-int-16-64.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17925/HI.2022.16.1.64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate left ventricular mechanical activation pattern by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure. Methods: Echocardiography was performed during no pacing, right ventricular pacing (RVP), biventricular pacing (BVP) and multipolar pacing (MPP) immediately after CRT implantation in 16 patients at a single centre. Seven patients were diagnosed as responders and 9 patients as non-responders after 6 months of standard CRT pacing. All had adequate short axis views, and 1 CRT responder and 2 CRT non-responders had limited longitudinal views. Results: Longitudinal and circumferential global strain (GS) and global strain rate (GSR) or their change analysis, did not yield any CRT response prediction. However, the longitudinal BVP/RVP GS ratio was significantly higher in the responder group (1.32 ± 0.2%, 2.0 ± 0.4% and 1.9 ± 0.4%), compared with the non-responder group (1.06 ± 0.2%, 1.1 ± 0.4% and 1.2 ± 0.4%) in the apical two-chamber, APLAX and four-chamber views, respectively. Similarly, the longitudinal BVP/RVP GSR at active systolic phase (GSRs) was significantly higher in the responder group (1.9 ± 0.9% and 1.7 ± 0.4%) compared with the non-responder group (1.0 ± 0.4% and 1.1 ± 0.2%) in the apical APLAX and four-chamber views, respectively. Measurements of the strain delay index showed predictive power regarding CRT response in non-paced patients. Conclusion: Post implantation, longitudinal BVP/RVP GS and GSRs ratios of 1.4% and above may be useful as a CRT response prediction tool. Furthermore, our findings support the usefulness of strain delay index prior to CRT implantation in non-paced patients.

不同起搏方式下斑点跟踪超声心动图对心脏再同步化治疗反应预测的比较。
背景:本研究的目的是通过斑点跟踪超声心动图(STE)评估左心室机械激活模式,作为心衰患者心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)反应的预测因子。方法:在单中心对16例CRT植入后立即进行无起搏、右心室起搏(RVP)、双心室起搏(BVP)和多极起搏(MPP)的超声心动图检查。在标准CRT起搏6个月后,7名患者被诊断为有反应,9名患者被诊断为无反应。所有人都有足够的短轴视野,1名CRT应答者和2名CRT无应答者有有限的纵向视野。结果:纵向和周向总应变(GS)和总应变率(GSR)及其变化分析不能预测CRT响应。然而,在根尖2室、APLAX和4室视图中,应答组的纵向BVP/RVP GS比值(1.32±0.2%、2.0±0.4%和1.9±0.4%)显著高于无应答组(1.06±0.2%、1.1±0.4%和1.2±0.4%)。同样,在applax和四室视图上,反应组的收缩期纵向BVP/RVP GSR (GSRs)分别为1.9±0.9%和1.7±0.4%,显著高于无反应组(1.0±0.4%和1.1±0.2%)。应变延迟指数的测量显示了对无节奏患者CRT反应的预测能力。结论:植入后,纵向BVP/RVP GS和gsr比值1.4%及以上可作为CRT疗效预测工具。此外,我们的研究结果支持应变延迟指数在非节奏患者CRT植入前的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart International
Heart International Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信