Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Invasive Mold Infections: A Challenging Field.

Christos Stafylidis, Panagiotis Diamantopoulos, Eleni Athanasoula, Elena Solomou, Amalia Anastasopoulou
{"title":"Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Invasive Mold Infections: A Challenging Field.","authors":"Christos Stafylidis,&nbsp;Panagiotis Diamantopoulos,&nbsp;Eleni Athanasoula,&nbsp;Elena Solomou,&nbsp;Amalia Anastasopoulou","doi":"10.3390/jof8111127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients comprise a highly immunocompromised group due to factors associated either with the treatment or the disease itself. Invasive mold infections (IMIs) are considered to be responsible for higher morbidity and mortality rates in patients with hematologic malignancies, including ALL. Defining the exact incidence of IMIs in ALL patients has been rather complicated. The available literature data report a highly variable incidence of IMIs, ranging from 2.2% to 15.4%. Although predisposing factors for IMIs in the setting of ALL are ill-defined, retrospective studies have indicated that a longer duration of neutropenia, treatment with high-dose corticosteroids, and a lack of antimold prophylaxis are associated with an increased risk of IMIs. Additionally, the influence of novel ALL treatments on the susceptibility to fungal infections remains obscure; however, initial data suggest that these treatments may induce prolonged neutropenia and thus an increased risk of IMIs. Administering primary antimold prophylaxis in these patients has been challenging since incorporating azole antifungal agents is troublesome, considering the drug-to-drug interactions (DDIs) and increased toxicity that may occur when these agents are coadministered with vincristine, a fundamental component of ALL chemotherapy regimens. Isavuconazole, along with several novel antifungal agents such as rezafungin, olorofim, and manogepix, may be appealing as primary antimold prophylaxis, given their broad-spectrum activity and less severe DDI potential. However, their use in ALL patients needs to be investigated through more clinical trials. In summary, this review outlines the epidemiology of IMI and the use of antifungal prophylaxis in ALL patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":520671,"journal":{"name":"Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9696423/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8111127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients comprise a highly immunocompromised group due to factors associated either with the treatment or the disease itself. Invasive mold infections (IMIs) are considered to be responsible for higher morbidity and mortality rates in patients with hematologic malignancies, including ALL. Defining the exact incidence of IMIs in ALL patients has been rather complicated. The available literature data report a highly variable incidence of IMIs, ranging from 2.2% to 15.4%. Although predisposing factors for IMIs in the setting of ALL are ill-defined, retrospective studies have indicated that a longer duration of neutropenia, treatment with high-dose corticosteroids, and a lack of antimold prophylaxis are associated with an increased risk of IMIs. Additionally, the influence of novel ALL treatments on the susceptibility to fungal infections remains obscure; however, initial data suggest that these treatments may induce prolonged neutropenia and thus an increased risk of IMIs. Administering primary antimold prophylaxis in these patients has been challenging since incorporating azole antifungal agents is troublesome, considering the drug-to-drug interactions (DDIs) and increased toxicity that may occur when these agents are coadministered with vincristine, a fundamental component of ALL chemotherapy regimens. Isavuconazole, along with several novel antifungal agents such as rezafungin, olorofim, and manogepix, may be appealing as primary antimold prophylaxis, given their broad-spectrum activity and less severe DDI potential. However, their use in ALL patients needs to be investigated through more clinical trials. In summary, this review outlines the epidemiology of IMI and the use of antifungal prophylaxis in ALL patients.

急性淋巴细胞白血病和侵袭性霉菌感染:一个具有挑战性的领域。
急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患者包括一个高度免疫功能低下的群体,这是由于与治疗或疾病本身相关的因素。侵袭性霉菌感染(IMIs)被认为是血液学恶性肿瘤(包括ALL)患者较高发病率和死亡率的原因。确定ALL患者中imi的确切发生率相当复杂。现有文献数据显示,imi的发病率变化很大,从2.2%到15.4%不等。尽管急性淋巴细胞白血病中发生IMIs的易感因素尚不明确,但回顾性研究表明,中性粒细胞减少持续时间较长、使用大剂量皮质类固醇治疗以及缺乏抗衰老预防与IMIs的风险增加有关。此外,新型ALL治疗对真菌感染易感性的影响仍不清楚;然而,初步数据表明,这些治疗可能会导致中性粒细胞减少延长,从而增加IMIs的风险。考虑到药物与药物相互作用(ddi)以及当这些药物与长春新碱(ALL化疗方案的基本组成部分)共同使用时可能发生的毒性增加,在这些患者中给予初级抗真菌预防一直具有挑战性。Isavuconazole与几种新型抗真菌药物(如rezafungin、olorofim和mangepix)可能作为初级抗真菌预防药物具有吸引力,因为它们具有广谱活性和不太严重的DDI潜力。然而,它们在ALL患者中的应用需要通过更多的临床试验来研究。总之,这篇综述概述了IMI的流行病学和抗真菌预防在ALL患者中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信