Complications of Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy: Analysis and Risk Factors.

IF 2.3 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Prostate Cancer Pub Date : 2022-10-22 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/7631903
Pedro Castro, Paulo B O Arantes, Yves M R Martins, Matheus N M Reis, Ana Paula Drummond-Lage, Alberto J A Wainstein
{"title":"Complications of Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy: Analysis and Risk Factors.","authors":"Pedro Castro,&nbsp;Paulo B O Arantes,&nbsp;Yves M R Martins,&nbsp;Matheus N M Reis,&nbsp;Ana Paula Drummond-Lage,&nbsp;Alberto J A Wainstein","doi":"10.1155/2022/7631903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The knowledge of risk factors and complications related to extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) during radical prostatectomy can help selecting patients who will benefit the most with lymph node dissection concomitant to radical prostatectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort evaluating 135 patients with PC, with a high risk for lymph node metastasis, submitted to ePLND by a single surgeon between 2013 and 2019, performed either by the laparoscopic or laparoscopic robot-assisted approach. Data related to complications were properly recorded using the Martin's criteria and were classified by the Satava and Clavien-Dindo-Strasberg methods. Logistic regression was used to determine predictors of complications related to ePLND.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 10.2 ± 4.9, and in 28.2%, they were positive for metastasis. There were five intraoperative complications (4%), all in patients operated by laparoscopic approach. There were nine severe postoperative complications (7.3%), four of which occurred after postoperative day 30. Three patients (2.4%) had thromboembolic complications and five patients (4.0%) had lymphocele that required treatment. There was a correlation between the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification and postoperative complications (<i>p</i>=0.06), but it was not possible to identify statistically significant predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ePLND during radical prostatectomy has a low rate of intraoperative complications and may change prostate cancer staging. Postoperative complications, especially venous thromboembolism and lymphocele, need to be monitored even in the late postoperative period.</p>","PeriodicalId":20907,"journal":{"name":"Prostate Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7631903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The knowledge of risk factors and complications related to extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) during radical prostatectomy can help selecting patients who will benefit the most with lymph node dissection concomitant to radical prostatectomy.

Materials and methods: Retrospective cohort evaluating 135 patients with PC, with a high risk for lymph node metastasis, submitted to ePLND by a single surgeon between 2013 and 2019, performed either by the laparoscopic or laparoscopic robot-assisted approach. Data related to complications were properly recorded using the Martin's criteria and were classified by the Satava and Clavien-Dindo-Strasberg methods. Logistic regression was used to determine predictors of complications related to ePLND.

Results: The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 10.2 ± 4.9, and in 28.2%, they were positive for metastasis. There were five intraoperative complications (4%), all in patients operated by laparoscopic approach. There were nine severe postoperative complications (7.3%), four of which occurred after postoperative day 30. Three patients (2.4%) had thromboembolic complications and five patients (4.0%) had lymphocele that required treatment. There was a correlation between the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification and postoperative complications (p=0.06), but it was not possible to identify statistically significant predictors.

Conclusion: ePLND during radical prostatectomy has a low rate of intraoperative complications and may change prostate cancer staging. Postoperative complications, especially venous thromboembolism and lymphocele, need to be monitored even in the late postoperative period.

微创根治性前列腺切除术后扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫的并发症分析及危险因素分析。
背景:了解前列腺根治术中扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫(ePLND)相关的危险因素和并发症,有助于选择在前列腺根治术中淋巴结清扫获益最大的患者。材料和方法:回顾性队列评估2013年至2019年期间由一名外科医生提交至ePLND的135例淋巴结转移高风险PC患者,采用腹腔镜或腹腔镜机器人辅助入路。与并发症相关的数据使用Martin’s标准正确记录,并使用Satava和Clavien-Dindo-Strasberg方法进行分类。采用Logistic回归确定ePLND相关并发症的预测因素。结果:平均切除淋巴结数为10.2±4.9个,转移阳性占28.2%。术中并发症5例(4%),均为腹腔镜手术。术后严重并发症9例(7.3%),其中4例发生在术后第30天。3例患者(2.4%)有血栓栓塞并发症,5例患者(4.0%)有淋巴囊肿需要治疗。美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状态分类与术后并发症之间存在相关性(p=0.06),但无法确定具有统计学意义的预测因素。结论:根治性前列腺切除术中ePLND的术中并发症发生率低,可改变前列腺癌的分期。术后并发症,特别是静脉血栓栓塞和淋巴囊肿,即使在术后后期也需要监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Prostate Cancer is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a multidisciplinary platform for scientists, surgeons, oncologists and clinicians working on prostate cancer. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the diagnosis, surgery, radiotherapy, drug discovery and medical management of the disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信