The Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015: Interrogating the guiding principles for a person with dementia

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q1 LAW
Hope Davidson
{"title":"The Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015: Interrogating the guiding principles for a person with dementia","authors":"Hope Davidson","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2022.101819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Healthcare decision-making can present challenges for the person with dementia as many of the skills needed to navigate the decision-making process may be diminished or lost as a result of dementia. Currently in Ireland the law responds to this difficult dilemma by providing for a system of adult guardianship - and outside of that, a great deal of uncertainty. This is set to change when the Assisted Decision-Making Capacity Act (ADMCA) 2015 comes into force in the summer of 2022. The ADMCA aims to provide a modern statutory framework that supports decision-making by adults and enables them to retain the greatest amount of autonomy possible in situations where they lack or may shortly lack legal capacity. The Act aims to do this both through creating a set of guiding principles for decision-making and by the creation of formal decision-making agreements.</p><p>This article aims to examine the guiding principles of the Act as they affect the person with dementia, and to assess the degree to which they will support and guide people with dementia and their healthcare professionals in making decisions. The guiding principles are of singular importance because they will govern any treatment decision by or for a person which is not the subject of a formal agreement. In interrogating the guiding principles of the Act the article seeks to identify ways in which the ADMCA differs from the equivalent legislation in England and Wales, the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005. The MCA came into force in 2007 and therefore the discussion is informed by almost fifteen years operation of the MCA. The article will argue that not only is the ADMCA a huge step forward from the current position in Ireland but that a number of key differences between the MCA and the ADMCA mean that the ADMCA has the potential to be more empowering for the person with dementia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252722000450","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare decision-making can present challenges for the person with dementia as many of the skills needed to navigate the decision-making process may be diminished or lost as a result of dementia. Currently in Ireland the law responds to this difficult dilemma by providing for a system of adult guardianship - and outside of that, a great deal of uncertainty. This is set to change when the Assisted Decision-Making Capacity Act (ADMCA) 2015 comes into force in the summer of 2022. The ADMCA aims to provide a modern statutory framework that supports decision-making by adults and enables them to retain the greatest amount of autonomy possible in situations where they lack or may shortly lack legal capacity. The Act aims to do this both through creating a set of guiding principles for decision-making and by the creation of formal decision-making agreements.

This article aims to examine the guiding principles of the Act as they affect the person with dementia, and to assess the degree to which they will support and guide people with dementia and their healthcare professionals in making decisions. The guiding principles are of singular importance because they will govern any treatment decision by or for a person which is not the subject of a formal agreement. In interrogating the guiding principles of the Act the article seeks to identify ways in which the ADMCA differs from the equivalent legislation in England and Wales, the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005. The MCA came into force in 2007 and therefore the discussion is informed by almost fifteen years operation of the MCA. The article will argue that not only is the ADMCA a huge step forward from the current position in Ireland but that a number of key differences between the MCA and the ADMCA mean that the ADMCA has the potential to be more empowering for the person with dementia.

《2015年辅助决策(能力)法:询问痴呆症患者的指导原则》
医疗保健决策可能会给痴呆症患者带来挑战,因为痴呆症可能会减少或丧失指导决策过程所需的许多技能。目前在爱尔兰,法律通过提供成人监护制度来应对这一困境,除此之外,还有很多不确定性。当《2015年辅助决策能力法案》(ADMCA)于2022年夏天生效时,这种情况将会改变。ADMCA旨在提供一个现代的法律框架,支持成年人的决策,并使他们在缺乏或可能很快缺乏法律行为能力的情况下保留最大程度的自主权。该法旨在通过制定一套决策指导原则和制定正式的决策协定来做到这一点。本文旨在研究该法案的指导原则,因为它们影响到痴呆症患者,并评估它们将在多大程度上支持和指导痴呆症患者及其医疗保健专业人员做出决定。这些指导原则具有独特的重要性,因为它们将支配未经正式协议的人作出的或为其作出的任何治疗决定。在质疑该法案的指导原则时,本文试图找出ADMCA与英格兰和威尔士的等效立法《2005年精神能力法》(MCA)的不同之处。《MCA》于2007年生效,因此讨论是基于MCA近15年的运作。这篇文章认为,不仅是ADMCA从爱尔兰目前的立场向前迈出了一大步,而且MCA和ADMCA之间的一些关键差异意味着ADMCA有可能为痴呆症患者提供更多的权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Psychiatry is intended to provide a multi-disciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas and information among professionals concerned with the interface of law and psychiatry. There is a growing awareness of the need for exploring the fundamental goals of both the legal and psychiatric systems and the social implications of their interaction. The journal seeks to enhance understanding and cooperation in the field through the varied approaches represented, not only by law and psychiatry, but also by the social sciences and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信