Quality assurance in allied healthcare education: A narrative review.

0 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy Pub Date : 2022-07-26 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.29390/cjrt-2022-009
Jithin K Sreedharan, Arun Vijay Subbarayalu, Saad M AlRabeeah, Manjush Karthika, Madhuragauri Shevade, Musallam Abdullah Al Nasser, Abdullah S Alqahtani
{"title":"Quality assurance in allied healthcare education: A narrative review.","authors":"Jithin K Sreedharan, Arun Vijay Subbarayalu, Saad M AlRabeeah, Manjush Karthika, Madhuragauri Shevade, Musallam Abdullah Al Nasser, Abdullah S Alqahtani","doi":"10.29390/cjrt-2022-009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is no standard methodology for outlining the intricacies of allied healthcare education (AHE) or its quality. The profound misconception is that quality assurance (QA) in AHE is used on a \"voluntary\" basis. Given the absence of statutory regulatory mechanisms such as accreditation, validation, and audit by the peripheral agencies concerning QA, adoption of QA measures in AHE is not consistent, and it results in producing a subpar allied health workforce. This paper analyzes the need to include QA measures as an essential domain in evaluating the effectiveness of allied health professional education programs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A large database search was performed using pertinent terms, and a blueprint was developed for a meticulous literature review published between 2015 and 2021. Five hundred eighty-two articles were found and screened; a critical appraisal was performed for 22 peer-reviewed articles for relevant information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature review identified the need to use academic domains such as leadership, planning, delivery, and feedback as QA criteria to evaluate the efficiency of education and training in allied health professional education programs. Instructors and facilitators for specific knowledge and skill development and a description of their roles should also be used in QA evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resources for effective learning and teaching in the allied healthcare domain are limited. This review highlights the significant need to include a QA system in AHE, considering the pivotal role of these students in supporting humankind, now and in the future. The findings contribute to the research by providing essential insights into current trends and focusing on existing research in AHE quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":39373,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"103-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7d/8d/cjrt-2022-009.PMC9318339.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29390/cjrt-2022-009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is no standard methodology for outlining the intricacies of allied healthcare education (AHE) or its quality. The profound misconception is that quality assurance (QA) in AHE is used on a "voluntary" basis. Given the absence of statutory regulatory mechanisms such as accreditation, validation, and audit by the peripheral agencies concerning QA, adoption of QA measures in AHE is not consistent, and it results in producing a subpar allied health workforce. This paper analyzes the need to include QA measures as an essential domain in evaluating the effectiveness of allied health professional education programs.

Method: A large database search was performed using pertinent terms, and a blueprint was developed for a meticulous literature review published between 2015 and 2021. Five hundred eighty-two articles were found and screened; a critical appraisal was performed for 22 peer-reviewed articles for relevant information.

Results: The literature review identified the need to use academic domains such as leadership, planning, delivery, and feedback as QA criteria to evaluate the efficiency of education and training in allied health professional education programs. Instructors and facilitators for specific knowledge and skill development and a description of their roles should also be used in QA evaluation.

Conclusion: Resources for effective learning and teaching in the allied healthcare domain are limited. This review highlights the significant need to include a QA system in AHE, considering the pivotal role of these students in supporting humankind, now and in the future. The findings contribute to the research by providing essential insights into current trends and focusing on existing research in AHE quality.

Abstract Image

联合医疗保健教育的质量保证:叙述性综述。
导言:目前还没有标准的方法来概述联合医疗保健教育(AHE)的复杂性或其质量。一个严重的误解是,专职医疗保健教育中的质量保证(QA)是在 "自愿 "的基础上使用的。由于缺乏法定的监管机制,如资格认证、验证和有关质量保证的外围机构的审计,因此在 AHE 中采取的质量保证措施并不一致,其结果是培养出了一支不合格的专职医疗队伍。本文分析了将质量保证措施作为评估专职医疗专业教育项目有效性的一个重要领域的必要性:方法:使用相关术语进行了大型数据库搜索,并为 2015 年至 2021 年间发表的细致文献综述制定了蓝图。找到并筛选了 582 篇文章;对 22 篇同行评审文章的相关信息进行了批判性评估:文献综述发现,有必要将领导力、计划、授课和反馈等学术领域作为质量保证标准,以评估专职医疗专业教育项目的教育和培训效率。在质量保证评估中,还应使用特定知识和技能发展的指导者和促进者以及对其角色的描述:联合医疗保健领域有效学习和教学的资源有限。考虑到这些学生现在和将来在支持人类方面的关键作用,本综述强调了将质量保证系统纳入专职医疗保健教育的重大必要性。研究结果为研究提供了对当前趋势的重要见解,并重点关注了现有的专职医疗保健教育质量研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The CJRT is published four times a year and represents the interests of respiratory therapists nationally and internationally. The CJRT has been redesigned to act as an educational dissemination tool. The CJRT encourages submission of original articles, papers, commentaries, case studies, literature reviews and directed reading papers. Submissions can be sent to Rita Hansen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信