Development of a Spine X-Ray-Based Fracture Prediction Model Using a Deep Learning Algorithm.

Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-05 DOI:10.3803/EnM.2022.1461
Sung Hye Kong, Jae-Won Lee, Byeong Uk Bae, Jin Kyeong Sung, Kyu Hwan Jung, Jung Hee Kim, Chan Soo Shin
{"title":"Development of a Spine X-Ray-Based Fracture Prediction Model Using a Deep Learning Algorithm.","authors":"Sung Hye Kong,&nbsp;Jae-Won Lee,&nbsp;Byeong Uk Bae,&nbsp;Jin Kyeong Sung,&nbsp;Kyu Hwan Jung,&nbsp;Jung Hee Kim,&nbsp;Chan Soo Shin","doi":"10.3803/EnM.2022.1461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgruound: </strong>Since image-based fracture prediction models using deep learning are lacking, we aimed to develop an X-ray-based fracture prediction model using deep learning with longitudinal data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 1,595 participants aged 50 to 75 years with at least two lumbosacral radiographs without baseline fractures from 2010 to 2015 at Seoul National University Hospital. Positive and negative cases were defined according to whether vertebral fractures developed during follow-up. The cases were divided into training (n=1,416) and test (n=179) sets. A convolutional neural network (CNN)-based prediction algorithm, DeepSurv, was trained with images and baseline clinical information (age, sex, body mass index, glucocorticoid use, and secondary osteoporosis). The concordance index (C-index) was used to compare performance between DeepSurv and the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) and Cox proportional hazard (CoxPH) models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total participants, 1,188 (74.4%) were women, and the mean age was 60.5 years. During a mean follow-up period of 40.7 months, vertebral fractures occurred in 7.5% (120/1,595) of participants. In the test set, when DeepSurv learned with images and clinical features, it showed higher performance than FRAX and CoxPH in terms of C-index values (DeepSurv, 0.612; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.571 to 0.653; FRAX, 0.547; CoxPH, 0.594; 95% CI, 0.552 to 0.555). Notably, the DeepSurv method without clinical features had a higher C-index (0.614; 95% CI, 0.572 to 0.656) than that of FRAX in women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DeepSurv, a CNN-based prediction algorithm using baseline image and clinical information, outperformed the FRAX and CoxPH models in predicting osteoporotic fracture from spine radiographs in a longitudinal cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":520607,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea)","volume":" ","pages":"674-683"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a3/01/enm-2022-1461.PMC9449110.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2022.1461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Backgruound: Since image-based fracture prediction models using deep learning are lacking, we aimed to develop an X-ray-based fracture prediction model using deep learning with longitudinal data.

Methods: This study included 1,595 participants aged 50 to 75 years with at least two lumbosacral radiographs without baseline fractures from 2010 to 2015 at Seoul National University Hospital. Positive and negative cases were defined according to whether vertebral fractures developed during follow-up. The cases were divided into training (n=1,416) and test (n=179) sets. A convolutional neural network (CNN)-based prediction algorithm, DeepSurv, was trained with images and baseline clinical information (age, sex, body mass index, glucocorticoid use, and secondary osteoporosis). The concordance index (C-index) was used to compare performance between DeepSurv and the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) and Cox proportional hazard (CoxPH) models.

Results: Of the total participants, 1,188 (74.4%) were women, and the mean age was 60.5 years. During a mean follow-up period of 40.7 months, vertebral fractures occurred in 7.5% (120/1,595) of participants. In the test set, when DeepSurv learned with images and clinical features, it showed higher performance than FRAX and CoxPH in terms of C-index values (DeepSurv, 0.612; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.571 to 0.653; FRAX, 0.547; CoxPH, 0.594; 95% CI, 0.552 to 0.555). Notably, the DeepSurv method without clinical features had a higher C-index (0.614; 95% CI, 0.572 to 0.656) than that of FRAX in women.

Conclusion: DeepSurv, a CNN-based prediction algorithm using baseline image and clinical information, outperformed the FRAX and CoxPH models in predicting osteoporotic fracture from spine radiographs in a longitudinal cohort.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于深度学习算法的脊柱x线骨折预测模型的开发。
背景:由于缺乏基于图像的深度学习裂缝预测模型,我们的目标是利用纵向数据的深度学习开发基于x射线的裂缝预测模型。方法:本研究纳入了2010年至2015年首尔国立大学医院1595名年龄在50至75岁之间,至少两次腰骶x线片无基线骨折的参与者。根据随访中是否发生椎体骨折来确定阳性和阴性病例。病例被分为训练组(n= 1416)和测试组(n=179)。基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的预测算法DeepSurv使用图像和基线临床信息(年龄、性别、体重指数、糖皮质激素使用和继发性骨质疏松症)进行训练。一致性指数(C-index)用于比较DeepSurv与压裂风险评估工具(FRAX)和Cox比例风险(Cox xph)模型之间的性能。结果:女性1188人(74.4%),平均年龄60.5岁。在平均40.7个月的随访期间,7.5%(120/ 1595)的参与者发生椎体骨折。在测试集中,当DeepSurv使用图像和临床特征进行学习时,其c指数值比FRAX和CoxPH表现出更高的性能(DeepSurv, 0.612;95%置信区间[CI], 0.571 ~ 0.653;FRAX 0.547;CoxPH 0.594;95% CI, 0.552 ~ 0.555)。值得注意的是,无临床特征的DeepSurv方法的c指数更高(0.614;95% CI, 0.572 ~ 0.656)在女性中优于FRAX。结论:DeepSurv是一种基于cnn的基于基线图像和临床信息的预测算法,在纵向队列脊柱x线片预测骨质疏松性骨折方面优于FRAX和CoxPH模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信