Comparison of predictors of failure of early neurological improvement after successful endovascular treatment for posterior and anterior circulation large vessel occlusion: Data from ANGEL-ACT registry.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-20 DOI:10.1177/15910199221133164
Xinguang Yang, Jie Yang, Dapeng Sun, Anxin Wang, Xu Tong, Baixue Jia, Zhongrong Miao
{"title":"Comparison of predictors of failure of early neurological improvement after successful endovascular treatment for posterior and anterior circulation large vessel occlusion: Data from ANGEL-ACT registry.","authors":"Xinguang Yang, Jie Yang, Dapeng Sun, Anxin Wang, Xu Tong, Baixue Jia, Zhongrong Miao","doi":"10.1177/15910199221133164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify and compare the predictors of failure of early neurological improvement (fENI)after successful EVT for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ACLVO) and posterior circulation LVO (PCLVO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects were selected from the ANGEL-ACT registry. fENI was defined as unchanged or worsened in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSS) between admission and 24 h after EVT. Predictors of fENI after successful EVT (mTICI 2b-3) were determined via center-adjusted analyses. Univariable and multivariable comparisons between ACLVO and PCLVO were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1447 patients, 1128 were with ACLVO, and 319 were with PCLVO. Among the patients with ACLVO, there were 409 patients (36.3%) with fENI and 719 patients (63.7%) with ENI. We observed that pre-stroke mRS scale score of 2 (odd ratio[OR] 95% confidence interval[CI], 6.93[1.99-24.10], P = 0.002), initial NIHSS score (OR per point[95%CI], 0.97[0.95-0.99], P = 0.012), diabetes (OR[95%CI], 1.56[1.08-2.25], P = 0.017), previous ICH (OR[95%CI] 9.21[1.76-48.15], P = 0.008), local anesthesia (OR[95%CI] 1.63[1.10-2.42], P = 0.014), onset-to-puncture time (OR[95%CI], 1.001[1.000-1.001], P = 0.009), symptomatic ICH (OR[95%CI] 3.90[2.27-6.69], P < 0.001), and continued use of tirofiban within 2 h after EVT (OR[95%CI], 0.69[0.51-0.93], P = 0.014) were independent predictors of fENI of ACLVO after EVT. Among the patients with PCLVO, there were 112 patients (35.1%) with fENI and 207 patients (64.9%) with ENI. In contrast, admission SBP (OR[95%CI], 0.98[0.97-0.99], P = 0.012), and vascular dissection within 2 h after EVT (OR[95%CI], 7.23[1.33-39.13], P = 0.022) were independent predictors of fENI of PCLVO after EVT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In selected patients, successful EVT can lead to similar outcomes in PCLVO and ACLVO. Some predictors of fENI in both anterior circulation and posterior circulation were identified in our study, which should be highly considered in the clinical practice in LVO patients undergoing EVT.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569470/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199221133164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To identify and compare the predictors of failure of early neurological improvement (fENI)after successful EVT for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ACLVO) and posterior circulation LVO (PCLVO).

Methods: Subjects were selected from the ANGEL-ACT registry. fENI was defined as unchanged or worsened in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSS) between admission and 24 h after EVT. Predictors of fENI after successful EVT (mTICI 2b-3) were determined via center-adjusted analyses. Univariable and multivariable comparisons between ACLVO and PCLVO were performed.

Results: A total of 1447 patients, 1128 were with ACLVO, and 319 were with PCLVO. Among the patients with ACLVO, there were 409 patients (36.3%) with fENI and 719 patients (63.7%) with ENI. We observed that pre-stroke mRS scale score of 2 (odd ratio[OR] 95% confidence interval[CI], 6.93[1.99-24.10], P = 0.002), initial NIHSS score (OR per point[95%CI], 0.97[0.95-0.99], P = 0.012), diabetes (OR[95%CI], 1.56[1.08-2.25], P = 0.017), previous ICH (OR[95%CI] 9.21[1.76-48.15], P = 0.008), local anesthesia (OR[95%CI] 1.63[1.10-2.42], P = 0.014), onset-to-puncture time (OR[95%CI], 1.001[1.000-1.001], P = 0.009), symptomatic ICH (OR[95%CI] 3.90[2.27-6.69], P < 0.001), and continued use of tirofiban within 2 h after EVT (OR[95%CI], 0.69[0.51-0.93], P = 0.014) were independent predictors of fENI of ACLVO after EVT. Among the patients with PCLVO, there were 112 patients (35.1%) with fENI and 207 patients (64.9%) with ENI. In contrast, admission SBP (OR[95%CI], 0.98[0.97-0.99], P = 0.012), and vascular dissection within 2 h after EVT (OR[95%CI], 7.23[1.33-39.13], P = 0.022) were independent predictors of fENI of PCLVO after EVT.

Conclusion: In selected patients, successful EVT can lead to similar outcomes in PCLVO and ACLVO. Some predictors of fENI in both anterior circulation and posterior circulation were identified in our study, which should be highly considered in the clinical practice in LVO patients undergoing EVT.

血管内治疗后循环和前循环大血管闭塞成功后,早期神经功能改善失败的预测因素比较:ANGEL-ACT 登记数据。
目的:确定并比较前循环大血管闭塞(ACLVO)和后循环低压闭塞(PCLVO)EVT成功后早期神经功能改善失败(fENI)的预测因素:fENI的定义是入院至EVT后24小时内美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分不变或恶化。通过中心调整分析确定了 EVT 成功后 fENI 的预测因素(mTICI 2b-3)。对 ACLVO 和 PCLVO 进行单变量和多变量比较:共有 1447 例患者,其中 1128 例为 ACLVO,319 例为 PCLVO。在 ACLVO 患者中,409 名患者(36.3%)患有 fENI,719 名患者(63.7%)患有 ENI。我们观察到,卒中前 mRS 量表评分为 2(奇数比[OR] 95% 置信区间[CI],6.93[1.99-24.10],P = 0.002)、初始 NIHSS 评分(每点 OR[95%CI],0.97[0.95-0.99],P = 0.012)、糖尿病(OR[95%CI],1.56[1.08-2.25],P = 0.017)、既往 ICH(OR[95%CI]9.21[1.76-48.15],P = 0.008)、局部麻醉(OR[95%CI]1.63[1.10-2.42],P = 0.014)、发病至穿刺时间(OR[95%CI],1.001[1.000-1.001],P = 0.009)、无症状 ICH(OR[95%CI]3.90[2.27-6.69],P 结论:在经过选择的患者中,成功的 EVT 可为 PCLVO 和 ACLVO 带来相似的预后。我们的研究发现了前循环和后循环 fENI 的一些预测因素,这些因素应在接受 EVT 的 LVO 患者的临床实践中予以高度重视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信