The Color of Death; An Exploration of the Effect of Race and Religion Dimensions on Attitudes toward Euthanasia.

Omega Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-20 DOI:10.1177/00302228221135292
Soheil Sabriseilabi
{"title":"The Color of Death; An Exploration of the Effect of Race and Religion Dimensions on Attitudes toward Euthanasia.","authors":"Soheil Sabriseilabi","doi":"10.1177/00302228221135292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined the moderating role of race on the relationship between religion and euthanasia attitudes in the United States. Understanding the role of religion in attitudes toward euthanasia requires viewing religion as a multidimensional construct. In this study, four dimensions operationalized religion: religiosity, spirituality, afterlife beliefs (afterlife, heaven, and hell), and religious denomination. Using data from 1066 adults interviewed in the 2018 General Social Survey, a logistic regression showed that the impact of each dimension of religion varies across racial groups. Adding race as an interaction term moderated the effect of religion dimensions on people's attitudes toward euthanasia. Although most studies have shown a negative influence of religion, we found that not all dimensions of religion have a negative association with opposition to euthanasia and the role of each dimension differs based on individuals' race. We also found that any comprehensive understanding of the role of religion in shaping euthanasia attitudes should consider the moderating effect of race.</p>","PeriodicalId":74338,"journal":{"name":"Omega","volume":" ","pages":"455-473"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228221135292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examined the moderating role of race on the relationship between religion and euthanasia attitudes in the United States. Understanding the role of religion in attitudes toward euthanasia requires viewing religion as a multidimensional construct. In this study, four dimensions operationalized religion: religiosity, spirituality, afterlife beliefs (afterlife, heaven, and hell), and religious denomination. Using data from 1066 adults interviewed in the 2018 General Social Survey, a logistic regression showed that the impact of each dimension of religion varies across racial groups. Adding race as an interaction term moderated the effect of religion dimensions on people's attitudes toward euthanasia. Although most studies have shown a negative influence of religion, we found that not all dimensions of religion have a negative association with opposition to euthanasia and the role of each dimension differs based on individuals' race. We also found that any comprehensive understanding of the role of religion in shaping euthanasia attitudes should consider the moderating effect of race.

死亡的颜色;种族和宗教因素对安乐死态度影响的探索》(The Color of Death; An Exploration of the Effect of Race and Religion Dimensions on Attitudes toward Euthanasia)。
我们研究了种族对美国宗教与安乐死态度之间关系的调节作用。要理解宗教在安乐死态度中的作用,需要将宗教视为一个多维度的结构。在本研究中,有四个维度对宗教进行了操作:宗教性、灵性、来世信仰(来世、天堂和地狱)以及宗教派别。利用 2018 年一般社会调查中 1066 名受访成年人的数据,逻辑回归显示宗教的每个维度对不同种族群体的影响各不相同。加入种族作为交互项,可以调节宗教维度对人们安乐死态度的影响。尽管大多数研究都表明宗教具有负面影响,但我们发现并非所有宗教维度都与反对安乐死存在负面关联,而且每个维度的作用也因个人种族而异。我们还发现,要全面了解宗教对安乐死态度的影响,就必须考虑种族的调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信