Efficacy of Olanzapine in Anxiety Dimension of Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Calogero Crapanzano, Ilaria Casolaro, Stefano Damiani, Chiara Amendola
{"title":"Efficacy of Olanzapine in Anxiety Dimension of Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Calogero Crapanzano,&nbsp;Ilaria Casolaro,&nbsp;Stefano Damiani,&nbsp;Chiara Amendola","doi":"10.9758/cpn.2022.20.4.592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anxiety symptoms and anxiety disorders are frequent in patients with schizophrenia and are associated with greater severity of both positive and negative symptoms, cognitive impairment, poorer functioning and quality of life. Accumulating evidence suggests that atypical antipsychotics may have a role in treating comorbid anxiety symptoms. A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane guidelines, selecting randomized control trials (RCTs) that evaluated efficacy of olanzapine on anxiety symptoms in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia and included anxiety evaluation scales. We searched PubMed and Web of Science databases for articles in English language available until September 2021. We selected 7 studies (3 with primary data analysis, 4 with secondary data analysis) regarding the use of olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia. In fours studies olanzapine was superior to haloperidol in improving anxiety symptoms. Four studies compared olanzapine versus risperidone: in two of them risperidone was superior to olanzapine, although one study was limited by a relatively small sample size. In the other two there were no significant differences between olanzapine and risperidone-treated patients. One study found that olanzapine and clozapine were comparable in terms of efficacy. Although olanzapine was superior to haloperidol in treating anxiety, this symptom was a secondary outcome measure in most of the considered studies. Future RCTs comparing different antipsychotics and larger sample sizes may allow to develop more solid treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10420,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience","volume":"20 4","pages":"592-599"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0d/b9/cpn-20-4-592.PMC9606435.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9758/cpn.2022.20.4.592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Anxiety symptoms and anxiety disorders are frequent in patients with schizophrenia and are associated with greater severity of both positive and negative symptoms, cognitive impairment, poorer functioning and quality of life. Accumulating evidence suggests that atypical antipsychotics may have a role in treating comorbid anxiety symptoms. A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane guidelines, selecting randomized control trials (RCTs) that evaluated efficacy of olanzapine on anxiety symptoms in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia and included anxiety evaluation scales. We searched PubMed and Web of Science databases for articles in English language available until September 2021. We selected 7 studies (3 with primary data analysis, 4 with secondary data analysis) regarding the use of olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia. In fours studies olanzapine was superior to haloperidol in improving anxiety symptoms. Four studies compared olanzapine versus risperidone: in two of them risperidone was superior to olanzapine, although one study was limited by a relatively small sample size. In the other two there were no significant differences between olanzapine and risperidone-treated patients. One study found that olanzapine and clozapine were comparable in terms of efficacy. Although olanzapine was superior to haloperidol in treating anxiety, this symptom was a secondary outcome measure in most of the considered studies. Future RCTs comparing different antipsychotics and larger sample sizes may allow to develop more solid treatment strategies.

Abstract Image

奥氮平对精神分裂症焦虑维度的疗效:随机对照试验的系统评价。
焦虑症状和焦虑症在精神分裂症患者中很常见,并与阳性和阴性症状的严重程度、认知障碍、功能和生活质量下降有关。越来越多的证据表明,非典型抗精神病药物可能在治疗共病焦虑症状中起作用。根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)和Cochrane指南进行系统评价,选择随机对照试验(rct),评估奥氮平对精神分裂症患者焦虑症状的疗效,包括焦虑评估量表。我们在PubMed和Web of Science数据库中检索了2021年9月之前可用的英文文章。我们选择了7项关于精神分裂症患者使用奥氮平的研究(3项主要数据分析,4项次要数据分析)。在四项研究中,奥氮平在改善焦虑症状方面优于氟哌啶醇。四项研究比较了奥氮平和利培酮:其中两项研究中,利培酮优于奥氮平,尽管其中一项研究受样本量相对较小的限制。在其他两个方面,奥氮平和利培酮治疗的患者之间没有显著差异。一项研究发现奥氮平和氯氮平的疗效相当。虽然奥氮平在治疗焦虑方面优于氟哌啶醇,但在大多数考虑的研究中,这种症状是次要的结局指标。未来的随机对照试验比较不同的抗精神病药物和更大的样本量可能允许开发更可靠的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCESPHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience (Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci) launched in 2003, is the official journal of The Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology (KCNP), and the associate journal for Asian College of Neuropsychopharmacology (AsCNP). This journal aims to publish evidence-based, scientifically written articles related to clinical and preclinical studies in the field of psychopharmacology and neuroscience. This journal intends to foster and encourage communications between psychiatrist, neuroscientist and all related experts in Asia as well as worldwide. It is published four times a year at the last day of February, May, August, and November.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信