Time to speed up the diagnostic evaluation in clinically suspected rhinosinusitis patients: A debate on the conventional versus molecular workup to establish fungal infective etiology for prompt management.

Q3 Medicine
Uneza Husain, Ragini Tilak, Sushil K Aggarwal, Ketan Priyadarshi, Neeraj Dhameja
{"title":"Time to speed up the diagnostic evaluation in clinically suspected rhinosinusitis patients: A debate on the conventional versus molecular workup to establish fungal infective etiology for prompt management.","authors":"Uneza Husain,&nbsp;Ragini Tilak,&nbsp;Sushil K Aggarwal,&nbsp;Ketan Priyadarshi,&nbsp;Neeraj Dhameja","doi":"10.18502/cmm.8.1.9207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Rhinosinusitis (RS) is a clinical and radiological diagnosis that rarely reaches a proper infective etiological diagnosis. The most dreaded fact about invasive fungal rhinosinusitis is its poor prognosis in immunocompromised patients with a 60-80% mortality rate. The present study highlights and compares the various diagnostic techniques to establish a fungal etiological diagnosis in clinically suspected cases of RS from nasal biopsy specimens, with the emphasis on the molecular diagnostic approach.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective study included a total of 34 clinically suspected cases of RS who had recently undergone functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS)/biopsy from nasal polyps. Various laboratory methods (microbiological and histopathological) were utilized, including direct microscopic examination of clinical samples and fungal culture isolation. The molecular detection method of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from clinical samples was also explored simultaneously. Serum immunoglobulin-E (IgE) testing of patients was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 34 clinically suspected RS cases, fungal etiology was established in a total of 18 cases, 17 of whom were culture-proven. A total of 15 and 14 culture-proven cases were also detected on direct microscopic examination by potassium hydroxide (KOH) mount and histopathological staining, respectively. One case was additionally identified by molecular method. <i>Aspergillus flavus</i> complex was the most common pathogen isolated in culture. Allergic fungal RS was the most common type, followed by acute and chronic invasive types among all fungal RS cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Accurate and prompt etiological diagnosis of fungal RS is still lagging with fewer options for quick results. Although microscopy and culture isolation can't be replaced, PCR is a sensitive and specific method that should be incorporated as a supplementary tool for the early diagnosis and management, considering the delayed growth of fungi.</p>","PeriodicalId":10863,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Mycology","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9548079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Mycology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/cmm.8.1.9207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Rhinosinusitis (RS) is a clinical and radiological diagnosis that rarely reaches a proper infective etiological diagnosis. The most dreaded fact about invasive fungal rhinosinusitis is its poor prognosis in immunocompromised patients with a 60-80% mortality rate. The present study highlights and compares the various diagnostic techniques to establish a fungal etiological diagnosis in clinically suspected cases of RS from nasal biopsy specimens, with the emphasis on the molecular diagnostic approach.

Materials and methods: This prospective study included a total of 34 clinically suspected cases of RS who had recently undergone functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS)/biopsy from nasal polyps. Various laboratory methods (microbiological and histopathological) were utilized, including direct microscopic examination of clinical samples and fungal culture isolation. The molecular detection method of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from clinical samples was also explored simultaneously. Serum immunoglobulin-E (IgE) testing of patients was also performed.

Results: Out of 34 clinically suspected RS cases, fungal etiology was established in a total of 18 cases, 17 of whom were culture-proven. A total of 15 and 14 culture-proven cases were also detected on direct microscopic examination by potassium hydroxide (KOH) mount and histopathological staining, respectively. One case was additionally identified by molecular method. Aspergillus flavus complex was the most common pathogen isolated in culture. Allergic fungal RS was the most common type, followed by acute and chronic invasive types among all fungal RS cases.

Conclusion: Accurate and prompt etiological diagnosis of fungal RS is still lagging with fewer options for quick results. Although microscopy and culture isolation can't be replaced, PCR is a sensitive and specific method that should be incorporated as a supplementary tool for the early diagnosis and management, considering the delayed growth of fungi.

Abstract Image

加快临床疑似鼻窦炎患者诊断评估的时间:关于常规检查与分子检查以确定真菌感染病因并及时处理的争论。
背景与目的:鼻鼻窦炎(RS)是一种临床和影像学诊断,很少得到正确的感染病因诊断。侵袭性真菌性鼻窦炎最可怕的事实是其在免疫功能低下患者中的预后不良,死亡率为60-80%。本研究强调并比较了各种诊断技术,以建立从鼻活检标本临床疑似RS病例的真菌病因学诊断,重点是分子诊断方法。材料和方法:本前瞻性研究共纳入34例临床疑似RS病例,这些病例最近接受了功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)/鼻息肉活检。使用各种实验室方法(微生物学和组织病理学),包括临床样品的直接显微镜检查和真菌培养分离。同时对临床样品中聚合酶链反应(PCR)的分子检测方法进行了探讨。同时进行患者血清免疫球蛋白e (IgE)检测。结果:34例临床疑似RS病例中,真菌病原学鉴定18例,其中培养证实17例。通过氢氧化钾(KOH)载片和组织病理学染色,分别检测到15例和14例培养证实的病例。另外用分子方法鉴定1例。黄曲霉复合体是培养中最常见的病原菌。变应性真菌RS是最常见的类型,其次是急性型和慢性侵袭型。结论:真菌性RS的准确、及时的病原学诊断仍然滞后,快速结果的选择较少。虽然显微镜和培养分离是无法替代的,但考虑到真菌生长的延迟,PCR是一种敏感和特异性强的方法,应作为早期诊断和治疗的辅助工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Mycology
Current Medical Mycology Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信