The Core Concepts, Competencies, and Grand Challenges of Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy and Morphology.

IF 2.2 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Integrative Organismal Biology Pub Date : 2022-07-30 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1093/iob/obac019
Nicole Danos, Katie Lynn Staab, Lisa B Whitenack
{"title":"The Core Concepts, Competencies, and Grand Challenges of Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy and Morphology.","authors":"Nicole Danos, Katie Lynn Staab, Lisa B Whitenack","doi":"10.1093/iob/obac019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Core concepts offer coherence to the discourse of a scientific discipline and facilitate teaching by identifying large unifying themes that can be tailored to the level of the class and expertise of the instructor. This approach to teaching has been shown to encourage deeper learning that can be integrated across subdisciplines of biology and has been adopted by several other biology subdisciplines. However, Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy, although one of the oldest biological areas of study, has not had its core concepts identified. Here, we present five core concepts and seven competencies (skills) for Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy that came out of an iterative process of engagement with the broader community of vertebrate morphologists over a 3-year period. The core concepts are (A) evolution, (B) structure and function, (C) morphological development, (D) integration, and (E) human anatomy is the result of vertebrate evolution. The core competencies students should gain from the study of comparative vertebrate anatomy are (F) tree thinking, (G) observation, (H) dissection of specimens, (I) depiction of anatomy, (J) appreciation of the importance of natural history collections, (K) science communication, and (L) data integration. We offer a succinct description of each core concept and competency, examples of learning outcomes that could be used to assess teaching effectiveness, and examples of relevant resources for both instructors and students. Additionally, we pose a grand challenge to the community, arguing that the field of Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy needs to acknowledge racism, androcentrism, homophobia, genocide, slavery, and other influences in its history and address their lingering effects in order to move forward as a thriving discipline that is inclusive of all students and scientists and continues to generate unbiased knowledge for the betterment of humanity. Despite the rigorous process used to compile these core concepts and competencies, we anticipate that they will serve as a framework for an ongoing conversation that ensures Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy remains a relevant field in discovery, innovation, and training of future generations of scientists.</p>","PeriodicalId":13666,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Organismal Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9338813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Organismal Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obac019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Core concepts offer coherence to the discourse of a scientific discipline and facilitate teaching by identifying large unifying themes that can be tailored to the level of the class and expertise of the instructor. This approach to teaching has been shown to encourage deeper learning that can be integrated across subdisciplines of biology and has been adopted by several other biology subdisciplines. However, Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy, although one of the oldest biological areas of study, has not had its core concepts identified. Here, we present five core concepts and seven competencies (skills) for Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy that came out of an iterative process of engagement with the broader community of vertebrate morphologists over a 3-year period. The core concepts are (A) evolution, (B) structure and function, (C) morphological development, (D) integration, and (E) human anatomy is the result of vertebrate evolution. The core competencies students should gain from the study of comparative vertebrate anatomy are (F) tree thinking, (G) observation, (H) dissection of specimens, (I) depiction of anatomy, (J) appreciation of the importance of natural history collections, (K) science communication, and (L) data integration. We offer a succinct description of each core concept and competency, examples of learning outcomes that could be used to assess teaching effectiveness, and examples of relevant resources for both instructors and students. Additionally, we pose a grand challenge to the community, arguing that the field of Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy needs to acknowledge racism, androcentrism, homophobia, genocide, slavery, and other influences in its history and address their lingering effects in order to move forward as a thriving discipline that is inclusive of all students and scientists and continues to generate unbiased knowledge for the betterment of humanity. Despite the rigorous process used to compile these core concepts and competencies, we anticipate that they will serve as a framework for an ongoing conversation that ensures Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy remains a relevant field in discovery, innovation, and training of future generations of scientists.

Abstract Image

比较脊椎动物解剖学和形态学的核心概念、能力和重大挑战。
核心概念为科学学科的讨论提供了连贯性,并通过确定大型统一主题来促进教学,这些主题可根据班级水平和教师的专业知识进行调整。事实证明,这种教学方法能鼓励学生进行更深入的学习,并能在生物学的各个分支学科之间进行整合,而且已被其他几个生物学分支学科所采用。然而,比较脊椎动物解剖学虽然是最古老的生物学研究领域之一,但其核心概念尚未确定。在此,我们提出了比较脊椎动物解剖学的五个核心概念和七项能力(技能),这些概念和能力是在与更广泛的脊椎动物形态学家群体进行了为期三年的反复接触后产生的。核心概念是:(A)进化;(B)结构和功能;(C)形态发展;(D)整合;(E)人体解剖学是脊椎动物进化的结果。通过比较脊椎动物解剖学的学习,学生应获得的核心能力包括:(F)树状思维;(G)观察;(H)解剖标本;(I)解剖描绘;(J)了解自然历史收藏的重要性;(K)科学交流;以及(L)数据整合。我们提供了每个核心概念和能力的简明描述、可用于评估教学效果的学习成果示例,以及供教师和学生使用的相关资源示例。此外,我们还向社会提出了一个宏大的挑战,认为比较脊椎动物解剖学领域需要承认种族主义、男性中心主义、同性恋恐惧症、种族灭绝、奴隶制以及其他历史影响,并解决其残留的影响,以便作为一门蓬勃发展的学科向前迈进,包容所有学生和科学家,并继续为人类的进步创造公正的知识。尽管编纂这些核心概念和能力的过程非常严格,但我们希望它们能成为一个持续对话的框架,确保比较脊椎动物解剖学在发现、创新和培养后代科学家方面始终是一个相关的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
48
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信