Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) in the Educational Sciences.

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Journal of Experimental Education Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-09 DOI:10.1080/00220973.2021.1906198
Jeffrey A Shero, Stephanie Al Otaiba, Chris Schatschneider, Sara A Hart
{"title":"Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) in the Educational Sciences.","authors":"Jeffrey A Shero,&nbsp;Stephanie Al Otaiba,&nbsp;Chris Schatschneider,&nbsp;Sara A Hart","doi":"10.1080/00220973.2021.1906198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many of the analytical models commonly used in educational research often aim to maximize explained variance and identify variable importance within models. These models are useful for understanding general ideas and trends, but give limited insight into the individuals within said models. Data envelopment analysis (DEA), is a method rooted in organizational management that makes such insights possible. Unlike models alluded to above, DEA does not explain variance. Instead, it explains how efficiently an individual utilizes their inputs to produce outputs, and identifies which input is not being utilized optimally. This paper provides a history and usages of DEA from fields outside of education, and describes the math and processes behind it. This paper then extends DEA's usage into the educational field using a study on child reading ability. Using students from the Project KIDS dataset (<i>n=1987</i>), DEA is demonstrated using a simple view of reading framework, identifying individual efficiency levels in using reading-based skills to achieve reading comprehension, determining which skills are being underutilized, and classifying new subsets of readers. New subsets of readers were identified using this method, with implications for more targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.2021.1906198","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2021.1906198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Many of the analytical models commonly used in educational research often aim to maximize explained variance and identify variable importance within models. These models are useful for understanding general ideas and trends, but give limited insight into the individuals within said models. Data envelopment analysis (DEA), is a method rooted in organizational management that makes such insights possible. Unlike models alluded to above, DEA does not explain variance. Instead, it explains how efficiently an individual utilizes their inputs to produce outputs, and identifies which input is not being utilized optimally. This paper provides a history and usages of DEA from fields outside of education, and describes the math and processes behind it. This paper then extends DEA's usage into the educational field using a study on child reading ability. Using students from the Project KIDS dataset (n=1987), DEA is demonstrated using a simple view of reading framework, identifying individual efficiency levels in using reading-based skills to achieve reading comprehension, determining which skills are being underutilized, and classifying new subsets of readers. New subsets of readers were identified using this method, with implications for more targeted interventions.

Abstract Image

教育科学中的数据包络分析(DEA)。
教育研究中常用的许多分析模型通常旨在最大限度地解释方差,并确定模型中变量的重要性。这些模型对于理解一般的想法和趋势很有用,但是对模型中的个体的了解有限。数据包络分析(DEA)是一种根植于组织管理的方法,它使这种见解成为可能。与上面提到的模型不同,DEA不解释方差。相反,它解释了个人如何有效地利用他们的投入来产生产出,并确定哪些投入没有得到最佳利用。本文从教育以外的领域提供了DEA的历史和用法,并描述了其背后的数学和过程。然后,本文通过对儿童阅读能力的研究,将DEA的应用扩展到教育领域。使用来自Project KIDS数据集的学生(n=1987),使用阅读框架的简单视图来演示DEA,确定使用基于阅读的技能来实现阅读理解的个人效率水平,确定哪些技能未被充分利用,并分类新的读者子集。使用这种方法确定了新的读者子集,这意味着更有针对性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信