High Prevalence of Thoracic Aortic Dilatation in Men with Previous Inguinal Hernia Repair.

Q3 Medicine
AORTA Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1749172
Emelie Carlestål, Anders Thorell, Lott Bergstrand, Francis Wilamowski, Anders Franco-Cereceda, Christian Olsson
{"title":"High Prevalence of Thoracic Aortic Dilatation in Men with Previous Inguinal Hernia Repair.","authors":"Emelie Carlestål,&nbsp;Anders Thorell,&nbsp;Lott Bergstrand,&nbsp;Francis Wilamowski,&nbsp;Anders Franco-Cereceda,&nbsp;Christian Olsson","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1749172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Identifying a useful marker for thoracic aortic dilatation (TAD) could help improve informed clinical decisions, enhance diagnosis, and develop TAD screening programs. Inguinal hernia could be such a marker. This study tested the hypothesis that the thoracic aorta is larger and more often dilated in men with previous inguinal hernia repair versus nonhernia controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Four hundred men each with either previous inguinal hernia repair or cholecystectomy (controls) were identified to undergo chest computed tomography to measure the diameter of the thoracic aorta in the aortic root, ascending, isthmic, and descending aorta and to provide self-reported health data. Presence of TAD (root or ascending diameter > 45 mm; isthmic or descending diameter > 35 mm) and thoracic aortic diameters were compared between groups and associations explored using uni- and multivariable statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Complete data were obtained from 470/718 (65%) eligible participants. TAD prevalence was significantly higher in the inguinal hernia group: 21 (10%) versus 6 (2.4%), <i>p</i> = 0.001 for proximal TAD, 29 (13%) versus 21 (8.3%), <i>p</i> = 0.049 for distal TAD, and 50 (23%) versus 27 (11%), <i>p</i> < 0.001 for all aortic segments combined. In multivariable analysis, previous inguinal hernia repair was independently associated with dilatation of the proximal aorta (odds ratio 5.3, 95% confidence interval 1.8-15, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Contrarily, mean thoracic aortic diameters were similar (root and ascending aorta) or showed clinically irrelevant differences (isthmus and descending aorta).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> TAD, but not increased aortic diameters on average, was common and significantly more prevalent in men with previous inguinal hernia repair. Hernia could be a marker condition associated with increased prevalence of TAD. Ultimately, TAD screening could consider hernia as a possible selection criterion.</p>","PeriodicalId":52392,"journal":{"name":"AORTA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AORTA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1749172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Identifying a useful marker for thoracic aortic dilatation (TAD) could help improve informed clinical decisions, enhance diagnosis, and develop TAD screening programs. Inguinal hernia could be such a marker. This study tested the hypothesis that the thoracic aorta is larger and more often dilated in men with previous inguinal hernia repair versus nonhernia controls.

Methods:  Four hundred men each with either previous inguinal hernia repair or cholecystectomy (controls) were identified to undergo chest computed tomography to measure the diameter of the thoracic aorta in the aortic root, ascending, isthmic, and descending aorta and to provide self-reported health data. Presence of TAD (root or ascending diameter > 45 mm; isthmic or descending diameter > 35 mm) and thoracic aortic diameters were compared between groups and associations explored using uni- and multivariable statistical methods.

Results:  Complete data were obtained from 470/718 (65%) eligible participants. TAD prevalence was significantly higher in the inguinal hernia group: 21 (10%) versus 6 (2.4%), p = 0.001 for proximal TAD, 29 (13%) versus 21 (8.3%), p = 0.049 for distal TAD, and 50 (23%) versus 27 (11%), p < 0.001 for all aortic segments combined. In multivariable analysis, previous inguinal hernia repair was independently associated with dilatation of the proximal aorta (odds ratio 5.3, 95% confidence interval 1.8-15, p = 0.003). Contrarily, mean thoracic aortic diameters were similar (root and ascending aorta) or showed clinically irrelevant differences (isthmus and descending aorta).

Conclusion:  TAD, but not increased aortic diameters on average, was common and significantly more prevalent in men with previous inguinal hernia repair. Hernia could be a marker condition associated with increased prevalence of TAD. Ultimately, TAD screening could consider hernia as a possible selection criterion.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

既往腹股沟疝修补的男性胸主动脉扩张的高发率。
背景:确定一个有用的胸主动脉扩张(TAD)标志物可以帮助改善知情的临床决策,提高诊断,并制定TAD筛查方案。腹股沟疝可能就是这样一个标志。本研究验证了一种假设,即与未患腹股沟疝的对照组相比,接受过腹股沟疝修补的男性胸主动脉更大,更常扩张。方法:选取400名既往有腹股沟疝修补或胆囊切除术(对照组)的男性进行胸部计算机断层扫描,测量主动脉根部、升主动脉、峡主动脉和降主动脉的直径,并提供自我报告的健康数据。存在TAD(根或升径> 45 mm);峡部或降主动脉直径> 35 mm)和胸主动脉直径组间比较,并采用单变量和多变量统计方法探讨相关性。结果:从470/718(65%)名符合条件的参与者中获得了完整的数据。腹股沟疝组TAD患病率显著高于腹股沟疝组:近端TAD 21例(10%)比6例(2.4%),p = 0.001,远端TAD 29例(13%)比21例(8.3%),p = 0.049,远端TAD 50例(23%)比27例(11%),p = 0.003。相反,平均胸主动脉直径相似(根主动脉和升主动脉)或表现出临床无关的差异(峡主动脉和降主动脉)。结论:TAD,而非主动脉直径平均增加,是常见的,并且在既往腹股沟疝修补的男性中更为普遍。疝气可能是TAD患病率增加的标志。最终,TAD筛查可考虑疝作为可能的选择标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AORTA
AORTA Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
119
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信