Engagement of scientists with the public and policymakers to promote alternative methods.

ALTEX Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.14573/altex.2209261
Sonja Von Aulock, Francois Busquet, Paul Locke, Kathrin Herrmann, Thomas Hartung
{"title":"Engagement of scientists with the public and policymakers to promote alternative methods.","authors":"Sonja Von Aulock,&nbsp;Francois Busquet,&nbsp;Paul Locke,&nbsp;Kathrin Herrmann,&nbsp;Thomas Hartung","doi":"10.14573/altex.2209261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scientists are usually good at teaching, sometimes even to lay audiences. But communicating with journalists, activists, or policymakers can be a different story - hesitancy to make mistakes as well as the temptation to disproportionally promote one's own case come into play. The multitude of social media and other web-based outlets has diversified and accelerated the communication of science. Real-time reactions, sharing of data, tools and results, increasing invitation of personal opinion, demand for transparency, political correctness, and loss of trust in experts are challenges to researchers in general. The field of alternatives to animal testing is more political and important to lay audiences than many others, so its scientists must be especially aware of these challenges. Public engagement offers the opportunity to form community and create wide support for non-animal research and its implementation. This requires scientists to step out of the ivory tower of higher education and engage with diverse interest groups by outreach activities, interviews, and press releases, etc. by employing tailored communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":520550,"journal":{"name":"ALTEX","volume":" ","pages":"543-559"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ALTEX","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2209261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Scientists are usually good at teaching, sometimes even to lay audiences. But communicating with journalists, activists, or policymakers can be a different story - hesitancy to make mistakes as well as the temptation to disproportionally promote one's own case come into play. The multitude of social media and other web-based outlets has diversified and accelerated the communication of science. Real-time reactions, sharing of data, tools and results, increasing invitation of personal opinion, demand for transparency, political correctness, and loss of trust in experts are challenges to researchers in general. The field of alternatives to animal testing is more political and important to lay audiences than many others, so its scientists must be especially aware of these challenges. Public engagement offers the opportunity to form community and create wide support for non-animal research and its implementation. This requires scientists to step out of the ivory tower of higher education and engage with diverse interest groups by outreach activities, interviews, and press releases, etc. by employing tailored communication.

科学家与公众和决策者的接触,以促进替代方法。
科学家通常善于教学,有时甚至对外行的听众也是如此。但是与记者、活动人士或政策制定者的沟通可能是另一回事——对犯错的犹豫以及过度宣传自己观点的诱惑开始发挥作用。大量的社交媒体和其他基于网络的渠道使科学传播多样化并加速了传播。实时反应、共享数据、工具和结果、越来越多地邀请个人意见、对透明度的要求、政治正确以及对专家信任的丧失,这些都是研究人员普遍面临的挑战。动物试验的替代品领域比其他领域更具政治性,对非专业观众来说也更重要,因此该领域的科学家必须特别意识到这些挑战。公众参与提供了形成社区并为非动物研究及其实施提供广泛支持的机会。这就要求科学家走出高等教育的象牙塔,通过拓展活动、采访和新闻稿等方式,通过量身定制的沟通方式,与不同的兴趣群体接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信