Item Selection With Collaborative Filtering in On-The-Fly Multistage Adaptive Testing.

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL
Applied Psychological Measurement Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-28 DOI:10.1177/01466216221124089
Jiaying Xiao, Okan Bulut
{"title":"Item Selection With Collaborative Filtering in On-The-Fly Multistage Adaptive Testing.","authors":"Jiaying Xiao,&nbsp;Okan Bulut","doi":"10.1177/01466216221124089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An important design feature in the implementation of both computerized adaptive testing and multistage adaptive testing is the use of an appropriate method for item selection. The item selection method is expected to select the most optimal items depending on the examinees' ability level while considering other design features (e.g., item exposure and item bank utilization). This study introduced collaborative filtering (CF) as a new method for item selection in the <i>on-the-fly assembled multistage adaptive testing</i> framework. The user-based CF (UBCF) and item-based CF (IBCF) methods were compared to the maximum Fisher information method based on the accuracy of ability estimation, item exposure rates, and item bank utilization under different test conditions (e.g., item bank size, test length, and the sparseness of training data). The simulation results indicated that the UBCF method outperformed the traditional item selection methods regarding measurement accuracy. Also, the IBCF method showed the most superior performance in terms of item bank utilization. Limitations of the current study and the directions for future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48300,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychological Measurement","volume":"46 8","pages":"690-704"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/09/ba/10.1177_01466216221124089.PMC9574085.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216221124089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An important design feature in the implementation of both computerized adaptive testing and multistage adaptive testing is the use of an appropriate method for item selection. The item selection method is expected to select the most optimal items depending on the examinees' ability level while considering other design features (e.g., item exposure and item bank utilization). This study introduced collaborative filtering (CF) as a new method for item selection in the on-the-fly assembled multistage adaptive testing framework. The user-based CF (UBCF) and item-based CF (IBCF) methods were compared to the maximum Fisher information method based on the accuracy of ability estimation, item exposure rates, and item bank utilization under different test conditions (e.g., item bank size, test length, and the sparseness of training data). The simulation results indicated that the UBCF method outperformed the traditional item selection methods regarding measurement accuracy. Also, the IBCF method showed the most superior performance in terms of item bank utilization. Limitations of the current study and the directions for future research are discussed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于协同过滤的动态多阶段自适应测试题项选择。
在计算机化自适应测试和多阶段自适应测试的实施中,一个重要的设计特征是使用适当的项目选择方法。项目选择方法是根据考生的能力水平选择最优的项目,同时考虑其他设计特征(例如项目暴露和题库利用率)。本研究将协同过滤作为一种新的方法引入到动态装配多阶段自适应测试框架中。在不同测试条件(如题库大小、测试长度和训练数据稀疏度)下,将基于用户的题库(UBCF)和基于项目的题库(IBCF)方法与最大Fisher信息法进行能力估计的准确性、项目暴露率和题库利用率的比较。仿真结果表明,UBCF方法在测量精度上优于传统的项目选择方法。同时,IBCF法在物题库利用率方面表现出最优的性能。讨论了当前研究的局限性和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Applied Psychological Measurement publishes empirical research on the application of techniques of psychological measurement to substantive problems in all areas of psychology and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信