Cytotoxicity evaluation and mechanism of endocrine-disrupting chemicals by the embryoid body test.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 TOXICOLOGY
Eui-Man Jung, Yeong-Min Yoo, Jae-Hwan Lee, Eui-Bae Jeung
{"title":"Cytotoxicity evaluation and mechanism of endocrine-disrupting chemicals by the embryoid body test.","authors":"Eui-Man Jung,&nbsp;Yeong-Min Yoo,&nbsp;Jae-Hwan Lee,&nbsp;Eui-Bae Jeung","doi":"10.1007/s43188-022-00132-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are a structurally diverse class of synthetic and natural compounds. EDCs can cause non-communicable diseases such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, thyroid disorders, neurodevelopmental disease, hormone-dependent cancers, and reproductive disorders. The embryoid body test (EBT) is a developmental toxicity test method that determines the size of embryoid bodies (EBs) and the viability of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) and fibroblasts (3T3 cells). The present study used the EBT to perform cytotoxicity evaluations of 10 EDCs and assessed the mechanistic relationship between endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and cytotoxicity. According to the statistical analysis and prediction model results, methylparaben, butylparaben, propylparaben, ethylparaben, triclosan, octylphenol, methoxychlor, bisphenol A, and diethylstilbestrol were classified as cytotoxic, but trichloroacetic acid was non-toxic. Classification accuracy was 90%. The mechanistic study showed that the cytotoxicities of butylparaben, propylparaben, octylphenol, and triclosan were induced by ER stress. The mRNA expressions of BiP, CHOP, and ATF4 were significantly higher following treatments with four EDCs compared to those after the control treatment. Compared to the control treatment, the mRNA levels of XBP1u and XBP1s increased significantly after butylparaben and propylparaben treatments, but did not increase with octylphenol and triclosan treatments. These results indicate that the EBT can be applied as an alternative toxicity test when evaluating the cytotoxicity of EDCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23181,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological Research","volume":"38 4","pages":"469-478"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532489/pdf/43188_2022_Article_132.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43188-022-00132-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are a structurally diverse class of synthetic and natural compounds. EDCs can cause non-communicable diseases such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, thyroid disorders, neurodevelopmental disease, hormone-dependent cancers, and reproductive disorders. The embryoid body test (EBT) is a developmental toxicity test method that determines the size of embryoid bodies (EBs) and the viability of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) and fibroblasts (3T3 cells). The present study used the EBT to perform cytotoxicity evaluations of 10 EDCs and assessed the mechanistic relationship between endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and cytotoxicity. According to the statistical analysis and prediction model results, methylparaben, butylparaben, propylparaben, ethylparaben, triclosan, octylphenol, methoxychlor, bisphenol A, and diethylstilbestrol were classified as cytotoxic, but trichloroacetic acid was non-toxic. Classification accuracy was 90%. The mechanistic study showed that the cytotoxicities of butylparaben, propylparaben, octylphenol, and triclosan were induced by ER stress. The mRNA expressions of BiP, CHOP, and ATF4 were significantly higher following treatments with four EDCs compared to those after the control treatment. Compared to the control treatment, the mRNA levels of XBP1u and XBP1s increased significantly after butylparaben and propylparaben treatments, but did not increase with octylphenol and triclosan treatments. These results indicate that the EBT can be applied as an alternative toxicity test when evaluating the cytotoxicity of EDCs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

胚胎体试验评价内分泌干扰物的细胞毒性及其作用机制。
内分泌干扰物(EDCs)是一类结构多样的合成和天然化合物。EDC可导致非传染性疾病,如肥胖、2型糖尿病、甲状腺疾病、神经发育疾病、激素依赖性癌症和生殖障碍。胚胎体试验(EBT)是一种发育毒性试验方法,用于确定胚胎体(EB)的大小以及小鼠胚胎干细胞(mESCs)和成纤维细胞(3T3细胞)的生存能力。本研究使用EBT对10种EDC进行了细胞毒性评估,并评估了内质网(ER)应激与细胞毒性之间的机制关系。根据统计分析和预测模型结果,对羟基苯甲酸甲酯、对羟基苯丁酯、对羟基苯基丙酯、对羟基苯乙酯、三氯生、辛基苯酚、甲氧基氯、双酚A和己烯雌酚属于细胞毒性,但三氯乙酸无毒。分类准确率为90%。机理研究表明,ER应激可诱导对羟基苯甲酸丁酯、对羟基苯丙酯、辛基苯酚和三氯生的细胞毒性。BiP、CHOP和ATF4的mRNA表达在用四种EDC处理后显著高于对照处理后。与对照处理相比,XBP1u和XBP1s的mRNA水平在对羟基苯甲酸丁酯和对羟基苯丙酯处理后显著增加,但在辛基酚和三氯生处理后没有增加。这些结果表明,EBT可以作为评估EDCs细胞毒性的替代毒性测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Toxicological Research is the official journal of the Korean Society of Toxicology. The journal covers all areas of Toxicological Research of chemicals, drugs and environmental agents affecting human and animals, which in turn impact public health. The journal’s mission is to disseminate scientific and technical information on diverse areas of toxicological research. Contributions by toxicologists, molecular biologists, geneticists, biochemists, pharmacologists, clinical researchers and epidemiologists with a global view on public health through toxicological research are welcome. Emphasis will be given to articles providing an understanding of the toxicological mechanisms affecting animal, human and public health. In the case of research articles using natural extracts, detailed information with respect to the origin, extraction method, chemical profiles, and characterization of standard compounds to ensure the reproducible pharmacological activity should be provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信