Factors Influencing Motivation and Work Engagement of Healthcare Professionals.

Dimitris Karaferis, Vassilis Aletras, Maria Raikou, Dimitris Niakas
{"title":"Factors Influencing Motivation and Work Engagement of Healthcare Professionals.","authors":"Dimitris Karaferis,&nbsp;Vassilis Aletras,&nbsp;Maria Raikou,&nbsp;Dimitris Niakas","doi":"10.5455/msm.2022.34.216-224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low level of health professionals' work motivation is a critical challenge for countries' health care system. A survey of ministries of health in many countries showed that low motivation was seen as the second most important health workforce problem after staff shortages.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to examine in detail the factors which can affect motivation and work engagement, to assess the motivation levels of personnel working in public hospitals and to identify any differences between the various categories of healthcare professionals employed at the 1st Regional Health Authority of Attica.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Frederick Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory was used as the theoretical framework. Twelve phrases were used that correspond to intrinsic and extrinsic motivating factors, namely achievement, recognition, nature of work, responsibility, advancement, growth, organizational policies, supervision, interpersonal relationships, working conditions, salary and job security. Phrases 1-6 covered the internal motivators and 7-12 correspond to the external. Additional questions were added covering the socio-demographic characteristics of respondents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 81.95% and 3,278 questionnaires were collected. Findings suggest that extrinsic motivation factors have slightly higher mean scores (MS=8.30) than intrinsic motivation factors (7.81). The role of factors like salary (9.31), organizational policies (8.91), growth (8.89) and job security (8.86) was significant. However, every category of hospital staff is affected in a different way and degree by each factor. In periods of crisis, the need of extrinsic factors of motivation increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Providing a motivating environment for employees becomes more fundamental in the healthcare system. Motivation of healthcare employees was affected by factors related to supervision, financial benefits, job training and growth. Efforts should be made to provide such benefits to health employees as appropriate especially, to those who did not get any such benefits. Officially recognizing best performance is suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":18358,"journal":{"name":"Materia Socio-Medica","volume":"34 3","pages":"216-224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/73/7a/MSM-34-216.PMC9559882.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materia Socio-Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2022.34.216-224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low level of health professionals' work motivation is a critical challenge for countries' health care system. A survey of ministries of health in many countries showed that low motivation was seen as the second most important health workforce problem after staff shortages.

Objective: The aim of the study was to examine in detail the factors which can affect motivation and work engagement, to assess the motivation levels of personnel working in public hospitals and to identify any differences between the various categories of healthcare professionals employed at the 1st Regional Health Authority of Attica.

Methods: Frederick Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory was used as the theoretical framework. Twelve phrases were used that correspond to intrinsic and extrinsic motivating factors, namely achievement, recognition, nature of work, responsibility, advancement, growth, organizational policies, supervision, interpersonal relationships, working conditions, salary and job security. Phrases 1-6 covered the internal motivators and 7-12 correspond to the external. Additional questions were added covering the socio-demographic characteristics of respondents.

Results: The response rate was 81.95% and 3,278 questionnaires were collected. Findings suggest that extrinsic motivation factors have slightly higher mean scores (MS=8.30) than intrinsic motivation factors (7.81). The role of factors like salary (9.31), organizational policies (8.91), growth (8.89) and job security (8.86) was significant. However, every category of hospital staff is affected in a different way and degree by each factor. In periods of crisis, the need of extrinsic factors of motivation increased.

Conclusions: Providing a motivating environment for employees becomes more fundamental in the healthcare system. Motivation of healthcare employees was affected by factors related to supervision, financial benefits, job training and growth. Efforts should be made to provide such benefits to health employees as appropriate especially, to those who did not get any such benefits. Officially recognizing best performance is suggested.

Abstract Image

影响医疗保健专业人员工作动机和工作投入的因素。
背景:卫生专业人员工作动机水平低是各国卫生保健系统面临的重大挑战。对许多国家卫生部的一项调查显示,积极性低被视为仅次于工作人员短缺的第二大卫生人力问题。目的:本研究的目的是详细检查可能影响动机和工作投入的因素,评估在公立医院工作的人员的动机水平,并确定在阿提卡第一地区卫生管理局雇用的各类保健专业人员之间的任何差异。方法:以赫茨伯格的动机卫生理论为理论框架。12个短语对应于内在和外在激励因素,即成就、认可、工作性质、责任、晋升、成长、组织政策、监督、人际关系、工作条件、工资和工作保障。短语1-6涉及内部激励因素,短语7-12涉及外部激励因素。还增加了一些问题,涉及答复者的社会人口特征。结果:回复率为81.95%,共回收问卷3278份。结果表明,外在激励因素的平均分(MS=8.30)略高于内在激励因素(MS= 7.81)。工资(9.31)、组织政策(8.91)、成长(8.89)和工作保障(8.86)等因素的作用显著。然而,每一类医院工作人员受各因素影响的方式和程度不同。在危机时期,对外在动机因素的需求增加了。结论:在医疗保健系统中,为员工提供一个激励的环境变得更加重要。医疗保健员工的动机受监管、经济利益、职业培训和成长相关因素的影响。应作出努力,酌情向保健工作人员提供这种福利,特别是向那些没有得到任何这种福利的人提供这种福利。建议对最佳表现进行官方认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信