Trabecular bone score as an additional therapeutic decision tool in osteoporosis and osteopenia

IF 2.5 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Atiporn Therdyothin , Tanawat Amphansap , Kamonchalat Apiromyanont
{"title":"Trabecular bone score as an additional therapeutic decision tool in osteoporosis and osteopenia","authors":"Atiporn Therdyothin ,&nbsp;Tanawat Amphansap ,&nbsp;Kamonchalat Apiromyanont","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2022.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the role of trabecular bone score (TBS), in addition to bone mineral density (BMD), and to aid decision making to initiate anti-osteoporotic treatment in postmenopausal women with osteopenia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>TBS was assessed in a cohort of Thai postmenopausal women with BMD of femoral neck (FN), total hip (TH), and lumbar spine (LS) performed at the Police General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand from July 2019 to October 2020. We retrospectively reviewed hospital database for underlying diseases, medication, and fractures, including relevant imaging and vertebral fracture assessment (VFA). Patients with previous osteoporosis treatment, skeletal malignancy, high-energy trauma, and uninterpretable BMD were excluded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total there were 407 postmenopausal women, including 115 with osteoporotic fractures. The mean TBS of the cohort was 1.264 ± 0.005. The proportion of osteoporotic subjects ranged from 9.1% by TH BMD to 27.0% by lowest BMD. In fractured patients, 21.7%–54.8% were found to have osteoporosis while osteopenia was found in 37.4%–43.5%. Among subjects with osteopenia and degraded TBS, fractures ranged from 21.7 to 50.9%. Addition of osteopenic subjects with degraded microarchitecture yielded a significantly higher number of subjects eligible for treatment with 3.25-fold increase in non-fractured participants, and 7 to 11 additional osteopenic patients should be treated to detect 1 fracture.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Addition of TBS helped capturing osteopenic women with high risk of fracture. Decision to treat osteopenic women with degraded TBS increased the number of patients receiving treatment. We recommend evaluating TBS in osteopenic women without fractures to aid therapeutic decision on treatment initiation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":"8 3","pages":"Pages 123-130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/55/32/main.PMC9577428.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405525522000449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the role of trabecular bone score (TBS), in addition to bone mineral density (BMD), and to aid decision making to initiate anti-osteoporotic treatment in postmenopausal women with osteopenia.

Methods

TBS was assessed in a cohort of Thai postmenopausal women with BMD of femoral neck (FN), total hip (TH), and lumbar spine (LS) performed at the Police General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand from July 2019 to October 2020. We retrospectively reviewed hospital database for underlying diseases, medication, and fractures, including relevant imaging and vertebral fracture assessment (VFA). Patients with previous osteoporosis treatment, skeletal malignancy, high-energy trauma, and uninterpretable BMD were excluded.

Results

In total there were 407 postmenopausal women, including 115 with osteoporotic fractures. The mean TBS of the cohort was 1.264 ± 0.005. The proportion of osteoporotic subjects ranged from 9.1% by TH BMD to 27.0% by lowest BMD. In fractured patients, 21.7%–54.8% were found to have osteoporosis while osteopenia was found in 37.4%–43.5%. Among subjects with osteopenia and degraded TBS, fractures ranged from 21.7 to 50.9%. Addition of osteopenic subjects with degraded microarchitecture yielded a significantly higher number of subjects eligible for treatment with 3.25-fold increase in non-fractured participants, and 7 to 11 additional osteopenic patients should be treated to detect 1 fracture.

Conclusions

Addition of TBS helped capturing osteopenic women with high risk of fracture. Decision to treat osteopenic women with degraded TBS increased the number of patients receiving treatment. We recommend evaluating TBS in osteopenic women without fractures to aid therapeutic decision on treatment initiation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

骨小梁评分作为骨质疏松和骨质减少的额外治疗决策工具
目的评价骨小梁评分(TBS)和骨密度(BMD)在绝经后骨质减少妇女中抗骨质疏松治疗中的作用。方法对2019年7月至2020年10月在泰国曼谷警察总医院接受股骨颈(FN)、全髋关节(TH)和腰椎(LS)骨密度检查的泰国绝经后妇女进行stbs评估。我们回顾性地回顾了基础疾病、药物和骨折的医院数据库,包括相关的影像学和椎体骨折评估(VFA)。既往有骨质疏松治疗、骨骼恶性肿瘤、高能创伤和无法解释的骨密度的患者被排除在外。结果绝经后妇女407例,其中骨质疏松性骨折115例。该队列的平均TBS为1.264±0.005。骨质疏松的比例从最低骨密度的9.1%到最低骨密度的27.0%不等。骨折患者骨质疏松发生率为21.7% ~ 54.8%,骨质减少发生率为37.4% ~ 43.5%。在骨质减少和TBS退化的受试者中,骨折发生率从21.7%到50.9%不等。微结构退化的骨质减少患者的加入使得符合治疗条件的患者数量显著增加,非骨折患者增加了3.25倍,并且需要治疗7 - 11个骨质减少患者才能发现1个骨折。结论TBS治疗有助于捕获骨质减少的高危骨折患者。决定治疗患有退化TBS的骨质减少妇女增加了接受治疗的患者数量。我们建议评估无骨折的骨质减少妇女的TBS,以帮助治疗决定开始治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology
自引率
5.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信