Calculating Relative Correction Factors for Quantitative Analysis with HILIC-HPLC-ELSD Method: Eight Fructooligosaccharides of Morinda Officinalis as a Case Study.

IF 2.3 3区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry Pub Date : 2022-08-12 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/8022473
Lihong Zhou, Hui Ni, Linlin Zhang, Wenyong Wu, Tengqian Zhang, Qi Su, Jing Zhou, Huali Long, Jinjun Hou, Jiyu Gong, Wanying Wu
{"title":"Calculating Relative Correction Factors for Quantitative Analysis with HILIC-HPLC-ELSD Method: Eight Fructooligosaccharides of <i>Morinda Officinalis</i> as a Case Study.","authors":"Lihong Zhou,&nbsp;Hui Ni,&nbsp;Linlin Zhang,&nbsp;Wenyong Wu,&nbsp;Tengqian Zhang,&nbsp;Qi Su,&nbsp;Jing Zhou,&nbsp;Huali Long,&nbsp;Jinjun Hou,&nbsp;Jiyu Gong,&nbsp;Wanying Wu","doi":"10.1155/2022/8022473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Because the response of evaporating light scattering detector (ELSD) being in a nonlinear mode, there is no consensus on the method of calculating its relative correction factors (RCF), which limits the application of the quantitative analysis for multi-components by a single marker (QAMS) with LC-ELSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using eight fructooligosaccharides of <i>Morinda officinalis</i> as a case study, the nystose (GF3) as a single standard was adopted to develop a QAMS method to simultaneously determine the other seven fructooligosaccharides with HILIC-HPLC-ELSD method. Six calculation methods of RCF were investigated to select the most reasonable method. The relative error of content between the QAMS and the external standard method (ESM) obtained from 30 batches of samples was used as an indicator to evaluate the six methods. Finally, a chemometrics analysis was performed to find the differential components among MO and its three processing products.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was first reported that only one calculation method was scientific for calculating RCF for the LC-ELSD method. The RCFs of GF3 to the other seven fructooligosaccharides (GF1-GF8) were obtained as 0.86, 0.91, 0.93, 1.05, 1.15, 1.12, and 1.18, respectively. The QAMS of eight fructooligosaccharides of <i>Morinda officinalis</i> was validated with good linearity (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> > 0.9998) and accepted the accuracy of 95-105% (RSD < 1.81%) based on nystose. Finally, <i>Morinda officinalis</i> and its three processed products were distinguished and could be differed based on the content of the eight fructooligosaccharides.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The scientific calculation method of RCF would be of great significance for developing the QAMS method in Pharmacopoeia when performing the LC-ELSD method.</p>","PeriodicalId":14974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8022473","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Because the response of evaporating light scattering detector (ELSD) being in a nonlinear mode, there is no consensus on the method of calculating its relative correction factors (RCF), which limits the application of the quantitative analysis for multi-components by a single marker (QAMS) with LC-ELSD.

Methods: Using eight fructooligosaccharides of Morinda officinalis as a case study, the nystose (GF3) as a single standard was adopted to develop a QAMS method to simultaneously determine the other seven fructooligosaccharides with HILIC-HPLC-ELSD method. Six calculation methods of RCF were investigated to select the most reasonable method. The relative error of content between the QAMS and the external standard method (ESM) obtained from 30 batches of samples was used as an indicator to evaluate the six methods. Finally, a chemometrics analysis was performed to find the differential components among MO and its three processing products.

Results: It was first reported that only one calculation method was scientific for calculating RCF for the LC-ELSD method. The RCFs of GF3 to the other seven fructooligosaccharides (GF1-GF8) were obtained as 0.86, 0.91, 0.93, 1.05, 1.15, 1.12, and 1.18, respectively. The QAMS of eight fructooligosaccharides of Morinda officinalis was validated with good linearity (R 2 > 0.9998) and accepted the accuracy of 95-105% (RSD < 1.81%) based on nystose. Finally, Morinda officinalis and its three processed products were distinguished and could be differed based on the content of the eight fructooligosaccharides.

Conclusion: The scientific calculation method of RCF would be of great significance for developing the QAMS method in Pharmacopoeia when performing the LC-ELSD method.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

HILIC-HPLC-ELSD法定量分析的相对校正因子计算——以巴戟天8种低聚果糖为例
目的:由于蒸发光散射检测器(ELSD)的响应呈非线性模式,其相对校正因子(RCF)的计算方法尚无共识,限制了LC-ELSD在单标记多组分定量分析(QAMS)中的应用。方法:以8种低聚果糖为例,以nystose (GF3)为单一标准,建立QAMS方法,同时采用HILIC-HPLC-ELSD法测定其他7种低聚果糖。研究了6种RCF的计算方法,以选择最合理的计算方法。以30批样品中QAMS与外标法(ESM)含量的相对误差作为评价6种方法的指标。最后,进行化学计量学分析,找出MO及其三种加工产品之间的差异成分。结果:首次报道了LC-ELSD法计算RCF只有一种计算方法是科学的。GF3与其他7种低聚果糖(GF1-GF8)的rcf分别为0.86、0.91、0.93、1.05、1.15、1.12和1.18。马桑8种低聚果糖的质量质量体系具有良好的线性关系(r2 > 0.9998),准确度在95 ~ 105%之间(RSD为95 ~ 105%)。马桑及其3种加工产品可根据8种低聚果糖的含量进行区分。结论:建立科学的RCF计算方法对药典中QAMS方法的建立具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry
Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-ENGINEERING, CIVIL
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
79
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry publishes papers reporting methods and instrumentation for chemical analysis, and their application to real-world problems. Articles may be either practical or theoretical. Subject areas include (but are by no means limited to): Separation Spectroscopy Mass spectrometry Chromatography Analytical Sample Preparation Electrochemical analysis Hyphenated techniques Data processing As well as original research, Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry also publishes focused review articles that examine the state of the art, identify emerging trends, and suggest future directions for developing fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信