Predictive value of 'Smartscopy' for the detection of preinvasive cervical lesions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a diagnostic study.

Obstetrics & gynecology science Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-28 DOI:10.5468/ogs.22092
Thamawoot Phoblap, Amornrat Temtanakitpaisan, Apiwat Aue-Angkul, Pilaiwan Kleebkaow, Bandit Chumworathayi, Sanguanchoke Luanratanakorn, Yuwadee Itarat
{"title":"Predictive value of 'Smartscopy' for the detection of preinvasive cervical lesions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a diagnostic study.","authors":"Thamawoot Phoblap,&nbsp;Amornrat Temtanakitpaisan,&nbsp;Apiwat Aue-Angkul,&nbsp;Pilaiwan Kleebkaow,&nbsp;Bandit Chumworathayi,&nbsp;Sanguanchoke Luanratanakorn,&nbsp;Yuwadee Itarat","doi":"10.5468/ogs.22092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the performance of \"Smartscopy\" in diagnosing preinvasive cervical lesions among patients with abnormal cervical cancer screening results obtained during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This diagnostic study enrolled non-pregnant women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results obtained at the colposcopy clinic at Srinagarind Hospital (Khon Kaen, Thailand) between September 2020 and March 2021. Two colposcopists independently evaluated the uterine cervix using a smartphone and colposcopy. Cervical biopsies and endocervical curettage were performed in accordance with standard procedures. The diagnostic performance of a smartphone in detecting low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse plus (LSIL+) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions plus (HSIL+) was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 247 patients were included. There was high agreement between the two colposcopists (κ=0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.93). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the smartphone to detect LSIL+ were 96.6% (95% CI, 91.6-99.1), 12.9% (95% CI, 8.06-19.2), 46.2% (95% CI, 39.7-52.4), 83.3% (95% CI, 62.6-95.3), and 0.49% (95% CI, 0.43-0.55), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of smartscopy in diagnosing HSIL+ were 67.6% (95% CI, 55.2- 78.5), 85.4% (95% CI, 79.9-90.0), 60.5% (95% CI, 48.6-71.6), 88.9% (95% CI, 83.7-92.9), and 81.0% (95% CI, 0.75-0.85), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Smartscopy demonstrated a remarkable correlation with colposcopy and a high diagnostic performance value for the detection of preinvasive cervical lesions. Therefore, smartscopy may be an alternative tool for detecting abnormal cervical lesions in low to medium medical resource settings. Smartscopy may be applied in telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":520726,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & gynecology science","volume":" ","pages":"451-458"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d0/4e/ogs-22092.PMC9483663.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & gynecology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.22092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the performance of "Smartscopy" in diagnosing preinvasive cervical lesions among patients with abnormal cervical cancer screening results obtained during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Methods: This diagnostic study enrolled non-pregnant women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results obtained at the colposcopy clinic at Srinagarind Hospital (Khon Kaen, Thailand) between September 2020 and March 2021. Two colposcopists independently evaluated the uterine cervix using a smartphone and colposcopy. Cervical biopsies and endocervical curettage were performed in accordance with standard procedures. The diagnostic performance of a smartphone in detecting low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse plus (LSIL+) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions plus (HSIL+) was assessed.

Results: In total, 247 patients were included. There was high agreement between the two colposcopists (κ=0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.93). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the smartphone to detect LSIL+ were 96.6% (95% CI, 91.6-99.1), 12.9% (95% CI, 8.06-19.2), 46.2% (95% CI, 39.7-52.4), 83.3% (95% CI, 62.6-95.3), and 0.49% (95% CI, 0.43-0.55), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of smartscopy in diagnosing HSIL+ were 67.6% (95% CI, 55.2- 78.5), 85.4% (95% CI, 79.9-90.0), 60.5% (95% CI, 48.6-71.6), 88.9% (95% CI, 83.7-92.9), and 81.0% (95% CI, 0.75-0.85), respectively.

Conclusion: Smartscopy demonstrated a remarkable correlation with colposcopy and a high diagnostic performance value for the detection of preinvasive cervical lesions. Therefore, smartscopy may be an alternative tool for detecting abnormal cervical lesions in low to medium medical resource settings. Smartscopy may be applied in telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

“智能镜”在COVID-19大流行期间检测浸润前宫颈病变的预测价值:一项诊断研究
目的:评价“智能镜”在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间宫颈癌筛查结果异常患者中诊断宫颈浸润前病变的作用。方法:本诊断研究纳入了2020年9月至2021年3月期间在斯利那加林医院(泰国Khon Kaen)阴道镜诊所获得异常宫颈癌筛查结果的非孕妇。两名阴道镜检查师使用智能手机和阴道镜独立评估子宫颈。宫颈活检和宫颈刮除术按照标准程序进行。评估智能手机在检测低级别鳞状上皮内病变或更差级别病变(LSIL+)和高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL+)方面的诊断性能。结果:共纳入247例患者。两名阴道镜检查医师之间的一致性较高(κ=0.88;95%可信区间[CI], 0.82-0.93)。智能手机检测LSIL+的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为96.6% (95% CI, 91.6 ~ 99.1)、12.9% (95% CI, 8.06 ~ 19.2)、46.2% (95% CI, 39.7 ~ 52.4)、83.3% (95% CI, 62.6 ~ 95.3)和0.49% (95% CI, 0.43 ~ 0.55)。智能镜诊断HSIL+的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、准确性分别为67.6% (95% CI, 55.2 ~ 78.5)、85.4% (95% CI, 79.9 ~ 90.0)、60.5% (95% CI, 48.6 ~ 71.6)、88.9% (95% CI, 83.7 ~ 92.9)、81.0% (95% CI, 0.75 ~ 0.85)。结论:智能镜检查与阴道镜检查具有显著的相关性,对宫颈浸润前病变的检测具有较高的诊断价值。因此,智能镜检查可能是在低至中等医疗资源环境中检测异常宫颈病变的替代工具。新型冠状病毒大流行期间,智能镜可用于远程医疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信