An evaluation of common methods for comparing the scaling of vertical force production in flying insects

IF 2.2 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Nicholas P. Burnett, Emily L. Keliher, Stacey A. Combes
{"title":"An evaluation of common methods for comparing the scaling of vertical force production in flying insects","authors":"Nicholas P. Burnett,&nbsp;Emily L. Keliher,&nbsp;Stacey A. Combes","doi":"10.1016/j.cris.2022.100042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Maximum vertical force production (F<sub>vert</sub>) is an integral measure of flight performance that generally scales with size. Numerous methods of measuring F<sub>vert</sub> and body size are accessible to entomologists, but we do not know whether method selection affects inter- and intraspecific comparisons of F<sub>vert</sub>-size scaling. We compared two common techniques for measuring F<sub>vert</sub> in bumblebees (<em>Bombus impatiens</em>) and mason bees (<em>Osmia lignaria</em>), and examined F<sub>vert</sub> scaling using five size metrics. F<sub>vert</sub> results were similar with incremental or asymptotic load-lifting, but scaling analyses were sensitive to the size metric used. Analyses based on some size metrics indicated similar scaling exponents and coefficients between species, whereas other metrics indicated coefficients that differed by up to 18%. Furthermore, F<sub>vert</sub> showed isometry with body lengths and fed and starved masses, but negative allometry with dry mass. We conclude that F<sub>vert</sub> can be measured using either incremental or asymptotic loading but choosing a size metric for scaling studies requires careful consideration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34629,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Insect Science","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100042"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9387496/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Insect Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666515822000142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maximum vertical force production (Fvert) is an integral measure of flight performance that generally scales with size. Numerous methods of measuring Fvert and body size are accessible to entomologists, but we do not know whether method selection affects inter- and intraspecific comparisons of Fvert-size scaling. We compared two common techniques for measuring Fvert in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens) and mason bees (Osmia lignaria), and examined Fvert scaling using five size metrics. Fvert results were similar with incremental or asymptotic load-lifting, but scaling analyses were sensitive to the size metric used. Analyses based on some size metrics indicated similar scaling exponents and coefficients between species, whereas other metrics indicated coefficients that differed by up to 18%. Furthermore, Fvert showed isometry with body lengths and fed and starved masses, but negative allometry with dry mass. We conclude that Fvert can be measured using either incremental or asymptotic loading but choosing a size metric for scaling studies requires careful consideration.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

比较飞虫垂直力产生尺度的常用方法的评价
最大垂直力产生(Fvert)是飞行性能的一个整体衡量标准,通常与尺寸成比例。昆虫学家可以使用许多方法来测量虫体大小,但我们不知道方法选择是否会影响虫体大小尺度的种间和种内比较。我们比较了测量大黄蜂(Bombus impatiens)和泥石蜂(Osmia lignaria)的两种常用技术,并使用五种尺寸指标检查了Fvert缩放。vert结果与增量或渐近负荷提升相似,但尺度分析对所使用的尺寸度量很敏感。基于一些尺度指标的分析表明,物种之间的尺度指数和系数相似,而其他指标显示的系数差异高达18%。与体长、饱食质量呈等距,与干质量呈负异速。我们的结论是,vvert可以使用增量或渐近加载来测量,但选择缩放研究的尺寸度量需要仔细考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Research in Insect Science
Current Research in Insect Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
36 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信