Harm or protection? Two-sided consequences of females' susceptible responses to multiple threats.

IF 13.7 1区心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES

Behavioral and Brain Sciences Pub Date : 2022-07-25 DOI:10.1017/S0140525X22000607

Jingyuan Lin, Pim Cuijpers, Hong Li, Yi Lei

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The target article presented a plausible argument that females' susceptibility to threats might be self-protection for staying alive, but some evidence requires scrutiny. We need to consider (1) the biases of narrative reviews, (2) subjective life quality, and (3) the shadow side of extreme reactions to threats before concluding that females' threat-based response is a self-protection mechanism that promotes survival.

查看原文本刊更多论文

伤害还是保护?女性对多重威胁的敏感反应的双重后果。

目标文章提出了一个貌似合理的论点，即女性对威胁的敏感性可能是为了生存的自我保护，但一些证据需要仔细审查。我们需要考虑(1)叙事评论的偏见，(2)主观生活质量，(3)对威胁的极端反应的阴暗面，才能得出女性基于威胁的反应是一种促进生存的自我保护机制。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 医学-行为科学

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

1.70%

发文量

353

期刊介绍： Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is a highly respected journal that employs an innovative approach called Open Peer Commentary. This format allows for the publication of noteworthy and contentious research from various fields including psychology, neuroscience, behavioral biology, and cognitive science. Each article is accompanied by 20-40 commentaries from experts across these disciplines, as well as a response from the author themselves. This unique setup creates a captivating forum for the exchange of ideas, critical analysis, and the integration of research within the behavioral and brain sciences, spanning topics from molecular neurobiology and artificial intelligence to the philosophy of the mind.