Microbiological and Antibiotic Sensitivity Profile of Postoperative Endophthalmitis in a Tertiary Eye Care Hospital of North India.

IF 0.3 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Richa Ranjan, Manisha Agarwal, Shalini Singh, Rahul Mayor, Lagan Paul, Arpan Gandhi
{"title":"Microbiological and Antibiotic Sensitivity Profile of Postoperative Endophthalmitis in a Tertiary Eye Care Hospital of North India.","authors":"Richa Ranjan,&nbsp;Manisha Agarwal,&nbsp;Shalini Singh,&nbsp;Rahul Mayor,&nbsp;Lagan Paul,&nbsp;Arpan Gandhi","doi":"10.3126/nepjoph.v13i2.29255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We describe the microbiological profile of postoperative endophthalmitis from northern India and analyse the pattern of antibiotic sensitivity which may have changed due to development of resistance secondary to overuse of antimicrobial drugs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study of postoperative endophthalmitis from January 2011 to December 2017 in a tertiary eye hospital of northern India. Any patient developing endophthalmitis within one year of any intraocular procedure was included in the study. According to severity, treatment with a trial of intravitreal antibiotic injections or core vitrectomy was decided. Ocular samples were collected which were either anterior chamber tap or vitreous biopsy and sent for microbiological examination. The samples were stained with Gram's and KOH stain and cultured on chocolate agar, blood agar, brain heart infusion broth and Sabouraud dextrose agar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 545 patients of postoperative endophthalmitis were analysed which showed a male predilection (60.5%) with maximum patients between the age group 50-69 years. 292 patients (53.5%) were culture negative and 253 patients (46.4%) were culture positive. Most common organism identified was Staphylococcus in 73 patients followed by Pseudomonas in 48 patients. Staphylococcus species was most sensitive to vancomycin (97%) followed by amikacin (91%) followed by gentamicin and moxifloxacin (88% each). Pseudomonas was the second most common isolate which showed maximum sensitivity to imipenem (82%) followed by ciprofloxacin(60%). Polymicrobial infection was noted in 23 patients. The most common fungal isolate was aspergillus in 11 patients, followed by fusarium in 10 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study shows that gram positive bacteria are the most common organisms in postoperative endophthalmitis and are most sensitive to vancomycin, followed by gram negative bacteria which show increased sensitivity with imipenem than commonly used antibiotic - ceftazidime.</p>","PeriodicalId":44759,"journal":{"name":"Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/nepjoph.v13i2.29255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We describe the microbiological profile of postoperative endophthalmitis from northern India and analyse the pattern of antibiotic sensitivity which may have changed due to development of resistance secondary to overuse of antimicrobial drugs.

Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study of postoperative endophthalmitis from January 2011 to December 2017 in a tertiary eye hospital of northern India. Any patient developing endophthalmitis within one year of any intraocular procedure was included in the study. According to severity, treatment with a trial of intravitreal antibiotic injections or core vitrectomy was decided. Ocular samples were collected which were either anterior chamber tap or vitreous biopsy and sent for microbiological examination. The samples were stained with Gram's and KOH stain and cultured on chocolate agar, blood agar, brain heart infusion broth and Sabouraud dextrose agar.

Results: A total of 545 patients of postoperative endophthalmitis were analysed which showed a male predilection (60.5%) with maximum patients between the age group 50-69 years. 292 patients (53.5%) were culture negative and 253 patients (46.4%) were culture positive. Most common organism identified was Staphylococcus in 73 patients followed by Pseudomonas in 48 patients. Staphylococcus species was most sensitive to vancomycin (97%) followed by amikacin (91%) followed by gentamicin and moxifloxacin (88% each). Pseudomonas was the second most common isolate which showed maximum sensitivity to imipenem (82%) followed by ciprofloxacin(60%). Polymicrobial infection was noted in 23 patients. The most common fungal isolate was aspergillus in 11 patients, followed by fusarium in 10 patients.

Conclusion: Our study shows that gram positive bacteria are the most common organisms in postoperative endophthalmitis and are most sensitive to vancomycin, followed by gram negative bacteria which show increased sensitivity with imipenem than commonly used antibiotic - ceftazidime.

北印度一家三级眼科医院术后眼内炎的微生物学和抗生素敏感性分析。
简介:我们描述了印度北部术后眼内炎的微生物学特征,并分析了抗生素敏感性的模式,这种模式可能由于过度使用抗菌药物而产生耐药性而改变。材料与方法:回顾性研究2011年1月至2017年12月印度北部某三级眼科医院的术后眼内炎病例。任何在眼内手术一年内发生眼内炎的患者都被纳入研究。根据病情严重程度,决定采用玻璃体内抗生素注射或玻璃体核心切除术。采集眼球标本进行前房穿刺或玻璃体活检,送微生物学检查。革兰氏染色和KOH染色,分别在巧克力琼脂、血琼脂、脑心灌注肉汤和Sabouraud葡萄糖琼脂上培养。结果:共分析545例术后眼内炎患者,以男性为主(60.5%),患者年龄以50 ~ 69岁居多。培养阴性292例(53.5%),培养阳性253例(46.4%)。73例患者中最常见的细菌是葡萄球菌,其次是48例假单胞菌。葡萄球菌对万古霉素最敏感(97%),其次是阿米卡星(91%),其次是庆大霉素和莫西沙星(88%)。假单胞菌是第二常见的分离物,对亚胺培南的敏感性最高(82%),其次是环丙沙星(60%)。23例患者出现多微生物感染。11例患者中最常见的真菌分离物是曲霉,10例患者中其次是镰刀菌。结论:我们的研究表明革兰氏阳性菌是术后眼内炎最常见的细菌,对万古霉素最敏感,其次是革兰氏阴性菌,对亚胺培南的敏感性高于常用抗生素头孢他啶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信