{"title":"Anxiety and Stress Seem Temporary during the Pneumonia COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey on the Mental Health Status of Healthcare Workers.","authors":"Hossein Abdolrahimzadeh Fard, Roham Borazjani, Amir Hossein Shams, Vala Rezaee, Shiva Aminnia, Maryam Salimi, Mahsa Ahadi, Shahram Paydar, Shahram Bolandparvaz, Nikta Rabiei, Sanaz Zare, Leila Shayan, Mina Sadeghi","doi":"10.30476/BEAT.2022.94720.1344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the presence/severity of depression, anxiety, and stress among health care workers (HCWs) who work on the specially allocated COVID-19 ward (Group A) and HCWs on the other wards (Group B).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This questionnaire-based study was conducted from January 25 to February 28, 2021. The mental status was assessed using the Persian version of the 42-item Depression, Anxiety, and Stress score (DASS-42). Gathered data was analyzed using SPSS version 25. The independent T-test and Chi-square tests were used to compare quantitative and qualitative variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-hundred and twenty two questionnaires were eligible for analysis. Group A consisted of 33 HCWs, and 189 (85.1%) individuals were working on the other wards. No statistically significant differences were seen regarding the Socio-demographic features except for the marital status (<i>p</i>=0.005). The depressions' mean score was comparable between group A and B (<i>p</i>=0.102). The mean scores of anxiety and stress were significantly lower in group A than group B (<i>p</i>=0.006), although the frequency of DASS-42 parameters did not differ between these two groups (<i>p</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Contrary to our assumptions, this study showed that the DASS-42 parameters were not higher in HCWs working on the COVID-19 wards. This might be justified by developing coping mechanisms, being on the honeymoon phase of the disaster, compassion satisfaction, promising vaccine news, and working on the less impacted hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":9333,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","volume":"10 3","pages":"128-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a4/11/bet-10-128.PMC9373054.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2022.94720.1344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the presence/severity of depression, anxiety, and stress among health care workers (HCWs) who work on the specially allocated COVID-19 ward (Group A) and HCWs on the other wards (Group B).
Methods: This questionnaire-based study was conducted from January 25 to February 28, 2021. The mental status was assessed using the Persian version of the 42-item Depression, Anxiety, and Stress score (DASS-42). Gathered data was analyzed using SPSS version 25. The independent T-test and Chi-square tests were used to compare quantitative and qualitative variables.
Results: Two-hundred and twenty two questionnaires were eligible for analysis. Group A consisted of 33 HCWs, and 189 (85.1%) individuals were working on the other wards. No statistically significant differences were seen regarding the Socio-demographic features except for the marital status (p=0.005). The depressions' mean score was comparable between group A and B (p=0.102). The mean scores of anxiety and stress were significantly lower in group A than group B (p=0.006), although the frequency of DASS-42 parameters did not differ between these two groups (p>0.05).
Conclusion: Contrary to our assumptions, this study showed that the DASS-42 parameters were not higher in HCWs working on the COVID-19 wards. This might be justified by developing coping mechanisms, being on the honeymoon phase of the disaster, compassion satisfaction, promising vaccine news, and working on the less impacted hospital.
目的:了解新型冠状病毒病区(A组)和其他病区(B组)医护人员抑郁、焦虑和压力的存在及严重程度。方法:于2021年1月25日至2月28日进行问卷调查。使用波斯语版42项抑郁、焦虑和压力评分(DASS-42)评估精神状态。收集的数据使用SPSS version 25进行分析。定量变量和定性变量的比较采用独立t检验和卡方检验。结果:符合分析条件的问卷共222份。A组33名HCWs, 189名(85.1%)在其他病房工作。除婚姻状况外,社会人口统计学特征差异无统计学意义(p=0.005)。A组和B组的抑郁平均评分具有可比性(p=0.102)。A组患者焦虑和压力的平均得分显著低于B组(p=0.006),但两组间DASS-42参数出现频率无显著差异(p>0.05)。结论:与我们的假设相反,本研究显示在COVID-19病房工作的医护人员的DASS-42参数并不更高。通过发展应对机制,处于灾难的蜜月期,同情满足,有希望的疫苗新闻,以及在受影响较小的医院工作,这可能是合理的。
期刊介绍:
BEAT: Bulletin of Emergency And Trauma is an international, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal coping with original research contributing to the field of emergency medicine and trauma. BEAT is the official journal of the Trauma Research Center (TRC) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Hungarian Trauma Society (HTS) and Lusitanian Association for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ALTEC/LATES) aiming to be a publication of international repute that serves as a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the emergency medicine and trauma. The aim of BEAT is to publish original research focusing on practicing and training of emergency medicine and trauma to publish peer-reviewed articles of current international interest in the form of original articles, brief communications, reviews, case reports, clinical images, and letters.