Validity and reliability of the Japanese versions of cognitive and behavioral scales for irritable bowel syndrome.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Nagisa Sugaya, Yoshitoshi Tomita, Misako Funaba, Hiroshi Iida, Kentaro Shirotsuki, Fumiyuki Chin Gardner, Toshinari Odawara, Tetsuya Ando, Masahiko Inamori
{"title":"Validity and reliability of the Japanese versions of cognitive and behavioral scales for irritable bowel syndrome.","authors":"Nagisa Sugaya,&nbsp;Yoshitoshi Tomita,&nbsp;Misako Funaba,&nbsp;Hiroshi Iida,&nbsp;Kentaro Shirotsuki,&nbsp;Fumiyuki Chin Gardner,&nbsp;Toshinari Odawara,&nbsp;Tetsuya Ando,&nbsp;Masahiko Inamori","doi":"10.1186/s13030-022-00244-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Cognitive Scale for Functional Bowel Disorders (CS-FBD) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Behavioral Responses Questionnaire (IBS-BRQ) are a useful measures to assess cognitive-behavioral aspects in individuals with IBS. This study aimed to confirm the reliability and validity of the Japanese versions of the CS-FBD (CS-FBD-J) and IBS-BRQ (IBS-BRQ-J).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants comprised 192 students and 22 outpatients diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). There were 76 students who met the diagnostic criteria for IBS and two students who received treatment for IBS. Participants completed questionnaires containing the CS-FBD-J, IBS Severity Index (IBS-SI), Visceral Sensitivity Index (VSI), 24-item Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale (DAS-24), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Social Adaptation Self-evaluation Scale (SASS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our exploratory factor analysis revealed that the CS-FBD-J had a unidimensional factor structure and that the factor loadings for two of the 25 items were less than 0.4. The IBS-BRQ-J had a two-factor structure, and the factor loadings for eight of the 26 items were less than 0.4. The confirmatory factor analysis for the 18-item version of IBS-BRQ-J showed that the model fit indices were not sufficient. The CS-FBD-J and IBS-BRQ-J had significant, moderate correlations with the IBS-SI and VSI in the IBS and control groups. Correlation between the DAS-24 and the CS-FBD-J was not significant. The CS-FBD-J and IBS-BRQ-J were significantly correlated to the HADS and SASS (IBS-BRQ-J) only in the IBS group. The scores of CS-FBD-J and IBS-BRQ-J showed significant group differences between the IBS patient group, non-patient IBS group, and control group. The internal consistencies of the CS-FBD-J and IBS-BRQ-J were high. The item-total correlation analysis for the CS-FBD-J and IBS-BRQ-J showed that the correlations between each item and the total score were significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed the reliability and validity of the 23-item version of the CS-FBS-J and the 18-item version of the IBS-BRQ-J with the deletion of items with low factor loadings. Regarding the IBS-BRQ-J, two factor structures were confirmed (factor 1: behavior obsessed with abdominal symptoms, factor 2: avoidance of abdominal symptoms and associated difficulties) although the model fit of the structure needs further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9308329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-022-00244-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Cognitive Scale for Functional Bowel Disorders (CS-FBD) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Behavioral Responses Questionnaire (IBS-BRQ) are a useful measures to assess cognitive-behavioral aspects in individuals with IBS. This study aimed to confirm the reliability and validity of the Japanese versions of the CS-FBD (CS-FBD-J) and IBS-BRQ (IBS-BRQ-J).

Methods: Participants comprised 192 students and 22 outpatients diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). There were 76 students who met the diagnostic criteria for IBS and two students who received treatment for IBS. Participants completed questionnaires containing the CS-FBD-J, IBS Severity Index (IBS-SI), Visceral Sensitivity Index (VSI), 24-item Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale (DAS-24), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Social Adaptation Self-evaluation Scale (SASS).

Results: Our exploratory factor analysis revealed that the CS-FBD-J had a unidimensional factor structure and that the factor loadings for two of the 25 items were less than 0.4. The IBS-BRQ-J had a two-factor structure, and the factor loadings for eight of the 26 items were less than 0.4. The confirmatory factor analysis for the 18-item version of IBS-BRQ-J showed that the model fit indices were not sufficient. The CS-FBD-J and IBS-BRQ-J had significant, moderate correlations with the IBS-SI and VSI in the IBS and control groups. Correlation between the DAS-24 and the CS-FBD-J was not significant. The CS-FBD-J and IBS-BRQ-J were significantly correlated to the HADS and SASS (IBS-BRQ-J) only in the IBS group. The scores of CS-FBD-J and IBS-BRQ-J showed significant group differences between the IBS patient group, non-patient IBS group, and control group. The internal consistencies of the CS-FBD-J and IBS-BRQ-J were high. The item-total correlation analysis for the CS-FBD-J and IBS-BRQ-J showed that the correlations between each item and the total score were significant.

Conclusion: This study confirmed the reliability and validity of the 23-item version of the CS-FBS-J and the 18-item version of the IBS-BRQ-J with the deletion of items with low factor loadings. Regarding the IBS-BRQ-J, two factor structures were confirmed (factor 1: behavior obsessed with abdominal symptoms, factor 2: avoidance of abdominal symptoms and associated difficulties) although the model fit of the structure needs further study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

日本版本肠易激综合征认知和行为量表的效度和信度。
背景:功能性肠病认知量表(CS-FBD)和肠易激综合征行为反应问卷(IBS- brq)是评估肠易激综合征患者认知行为方面的有效措施。本研究旨在验证日语版的CS-FBD (CS-FBD- j)和IBS-BRQ (IBS-BRQ- j)的信度和效度。方法:参与者包括192名学生和22名诊断为肠易激综合征(IBS)的门诊患者。76名学生符合肠易激综合征诊断标准,2名学生接受了肠易激综合征治疗。参与者完成问卷调查,包括CS-FBD-J、IBS严重程度指数(IBS- si)、内脏敏感性指数(VSI)、24项功能失调态度量表(DAS-24)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)和社会适应自我评价量表(SASS)。结果:探索性因子分析表明,CS-FBD-J量表具有单维因子结构,25个条目中有2个条目的因子负荷量均小于0.4。IBS-BRQ-J量表具有双因子结构,26个条目中有8个条目的因子负载量小于0.4。对18题版IBS-BRQ-J的验证性因子分析表明,模型拟合指标不充分。在IBS组和对照组中,CS-FBD-J和IBS- brq - j与IBS- si和VSI有显著的中度相关性。DAS-24与CS-FBD-J的相关性不显著。仅在IBS组,CS-FBD-J和IBS- brq - j与HADS和SASS (IBS- brq - j)显著相关。bs - fbd - j和IBS- brq - j评分在IBS患者组、非IBS患者组和对照组之间存在显著组间差异。CS-FBD-J和IBS-BRQ-J的内部一致性较高。CS-FBD-J和IBS-BRQ-J的题项与总分的相关分析显示,各题项与总分的相关均显著。结论:本研究通过删除低因子负荷题项,证实了23题本CS-FBS-J和18题本IBS-BRQ-J的信度和效度。对于IBS-BRQ-J,我们确认了两个因素结构(因素1:对腹部症状的行为痴迷,因素2:对腹部症状及相关困难的回避),但其结构的模型拟合还有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信