Innovations for microbiome targeting interventions - a patent landscape analysis indicating overall patenting activity decline and promising target disease areas.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Beneficial microbes Pub Date : 2022-10-04 Epub Date: 2022-08-18 DOI:10.3920/BM2021.0050
J K Timmis, D Flaherty Roussilhon, L H M van de Burgwal
{"title":"Innovations for microbiome targeting interventions - a patent landscape analysis indicating overall patenting activity decline and promising target disease areas.","authors":"J K Timmis, D Flaherty Roussilhon, L H M van de Burgwal","doi":"10.3920/BM2021.0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The human microbiota have been implicated in the aetiology and remedy of a host of disorders. However, due to the pervasive uncertainty inherent in the field of microbiota-targeting interventions and associated issues with establishing rigorous safety and efficacy profiles, regulatory oversight is suboptimal. This can dissuade innovators from further exploring novel and much needed health interventions. Modification of regulatory protocols and practices requires focussed efforts and funding to build the evidence base around future regulatory needs. Such modification can be critically informed by identification of changes and trends in technology fields to facilitate identification of regulatory gaps. To this purpose, this study rigorously collected and analysed patent data from Espacenet - covering the years 2013-2018 - and created a patent landscape analysis of microbiome targeting interventions with a focus on medicinal products. Pertinent patenting activity has declined overall. While, in absolute terms, patents most frequently claimed inventions targeting disorders of the gut and alimentary tract, relative year-on-year interest increases have been substantial for cancer, and disorders of the (neuro-)muscular and respiratory systems - driven by the private sector. Academic stakeholders showed top interest in disorders of the metabolism, anti-infectives, and skeletal and dermatological diseases. Although medicinal preparation claims dominated our dataset, a third of patents claimed food preparations, while only 1% claimed application as a diagnostic. Finally, China is, by an inordinate margin, a market of particular interest for both domestic and foreign innovators, indicating that microbiome targeting intervention innovation for EU and US markets might be frustrated. This study is the first to empirically demonstrate that live biotherapeutic product innovation is decelerating and potentially frustrated, supporting the urgent need for improved regulatory standards. Our results indicate which disease areas deserve particular attention for research funding to facilitate proper regulatory appraisal in the near- to mid-term future.</p>","PeriodicalId":8834,"journal":{"name":"Beneficial microbes","volume":"13 4","pages":"265-282"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beneficial microbes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2021.0050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The human microbiota have been implicated in the aetiology and remedy of a host of disorders. However, due to the pervasive uncertainty inherent in the field of microbiota-targeting interventions and associated issues with establishing rigorous safety and efficacy profiles, regulatory oversight is suboptimal. This can dissuade innovators from further exploring novel and much needed health interventions. Modification of regulatory protocols and practices requires focussed efforts and funding to build the evidence base around future regulatory needs. Such modification can be critically informed by identification of changes and trends in technology fields to facilitate identification of regulatory gaps. To this purpose, this study rigorously collected and analysed patent data from Espacenet - covering the years 2013-2018 - and created a patent landscape analysis of microbiome targeting interventions with a focus on medicinal products. Pertinent patenting activity has declined overall. While, in absolute terms, patents most frequently claimed inventions targeting disorders of the gut and alimentary tract, relative year-on-year interest increases have been substantial for cancer, and disorders of the (neuro-)muscular and respiratory systems - driven by the private sector. Academic stakeholders showed top interest in disorders of the metabolism, anti-infectives, and skeletal and dermatological diseases. Although medicinal preparation claims dominated our dataset, a third of patents claimed food preparations, while only 1% claimed application as a diagnostic. Finally, China is, by an inordinate margin, a market of particular interest for both domestic and foreign innovators, indicating that microbiome targeting intervention innovation for EU and US markets might be frustrated. This study is the first to empirically demonstrate that live biotherapeutic product innovation is decelerating and potentially frustrated, supporting the urgent need for improved regulatory standards. Our results indicate which disease areas deserve particular attention for research funding to facilitate proper regulatory appraisal in the near- to mid-term future.

以微生物组为目标的干预创新--显示专利活动总体下降和有希望的目标疾病领域的专利状况分析。
人类微生物群与一系列疾病的病因和治疗有关。然而,由于微生物群靶向干预领域普遍存在固有的不确定性,以及在建立严格的安全性和有效性概况方面的相关问题,监管的效果并不理想。这会阻碍创新者进一步探索急需的新型健康干预措施。修改监管规程和做法需要集中精力和资金,围绕未来的监管需求建立证据基础。这种修改可以通过识别技术领域的变化和趋势来获得重要信息,以促进识别监管差距。为此,本研究从 Espacenet 中严格收集并分析了 2013-2018 年的专利数据,并对微生物组靶向干预措施进行了专利状况分析,重点关注医药产品。相关专利活动总体上有所减少。虽然从绝对值来看,专利最经常要求的是针对肠道和消化道疾病的发明,但在私营部门的推动下,对癌症、(神经)肌肉系统和呼吸系统疾病的兴趣相对逐年大幅增加。学术利益相关者对新陈代谢紊乱、抗感染药物以及骨骼和皮肤疾病的兴趣最大。虽然药用制剂的专利申请在我们的数据集中占主导地位,但也有三分之一的专利申请涉及食品制剂,只有 1%的专利申请涉及诊断应用。最后,中国是国内外创新者都特别关注的市场,这表明针对欧盟和美国市场的微生物组干预创新可能会受挫。本研究首次以实证研究的方式证明,活体生物治疗产品的创新正在减速,并有可能受挫,因此迫切需要改进监管标准。我们的研究结果表明,哪些疾病领域值得特别关注,以便在近期到中期内获得适当的监管评估资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Beneficial microbes
Beneficial microbes MICROBIOLOGY-NUTRITION & DIETETICS
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Beneficial Microbes is a peer-reviewed scientific journal with a specific area of focus: the promotion of the science of microbes beneficial to the health and wellbeing of man and animal. The journal contains original research papers and critical reviews in all areas dealing with beneficial microbes in both the small and large intestine, together with opinions, a calendar of forthcoming beneficial microbes-related events and book reviews. The journal takes a multidisciplinary approach and focuses on a broad spectrum of issues, including safety aspects of pro- & prebiotics, regulatory aspects, mechanisms of action, health benefits for the host, optimal production processes, screening methods, (meta)genomics, proteomics and metabolomics, host and bacterial physiology, application, and role in health and disease in man and animal. Beneficial Microbes is intended to serve the needs of researchers and professionals from the scientific community and industry, as well as those of policy makers and regulators. The journal will have five major sections: * Food, nutrition and health * Animal nutrition * Processing and application * Regulatory & safety aspects * Medical & health applications In these sections, topics dealt with by Beneficial Microbes include: * Worldwide safety and regulatory issues * Human and animal nutrition and health effects * Latest discoveries in mechanistic studies and screening methods to unravel mode of action * Host physiology related to allergy, inflammation, obesity, etc. * Trends in application of (meta)genomics, proteomics and metabolomics * New developments in how processing optimizes pro- & prebiotics for application * Bacterial physiology related to health benefits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信