Weight of Evidence: Participatory Methods and Bayesian Updating to Contextualize Evidence Synthesis in Stakeholders' Knowledge.

IF 3.8 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Journal of Mixed Methods Research Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-13 DOI:10.1177/15586898211037412
Anna Dion, Alessandro Carini-Gutierrez, Vania Jimenez, Amal Ben Ameur, Emilie Robert, Lawrence Joseph, Neil Andersson
{"title":"<i>Weight of Evidence</i>: Participatory Methods and Bayesian Updating to Contextualize Evidence Synthesis in Stakeholders' Knowledge.","authors":"Anna Dion,&nbsp;Alessandro Carini-Gutierrez,&nbsp;Vania Jimenez,&nbsp;Amal Ben Ameur,&nbsp;Emilie Robert,&nbsp;Lawrence Joseph,&nbsp;Neil Andersson","doi":"10.1177/15586898211037412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mixed methods research is well-suited to grapple with questions of what counts as valid knowledge across different contexts and perspectives. This article introduces Weight of Evidence as a transformative procedure for stakeholders to interpret, expand on and prioritize evidence from evidence syntheses, with a focus on engaging populations historically excluded from planning and decision making. This article presents the procedure's five steps using pilot data on perinatal care of immigrant women in Canada, engaging family physicians and birth companions. Fuzzy cognitive mapping offers an accessible and systematic way to generate priors to update published literature with stakeholder priorities. Weight of Evidence is a transparent procedure to broaden what counts as expertise, contributing to a more comprehensive, context-specific, and actionable understanding.</p>","PeriodicalId":47844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mixed Methods Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/84/5a/10.1177_15586898211037412.PMC9297342.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mixed Methods Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211037412","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Mixed methods research is well-suited to grapple with questions of what counts as valid knowledge across different contexts and perspectives. This article introduces Weight of Evidence as a transformative procedure for stakeholders to interpret, expand on and prioritize evidence from evidence syntheses, with a focus on engaging populations historically excluded from planning and decision making. This article presents the procedure's five steps using pilot data on perinatal care of immigrant women in Canada, engaging family physicians and birth companions. Fuzzy cognitive mapping offers an accessible and systematic way to generate priors to update published literature with stakeholder priorities. Weight of Evidence is a transparent procedure to broaden what counts as expertise, contributing to a more comprehensive, context-specific, and actionable understanding.

证据的权重:参与式方法和贝叶斯更新在利益相关者知识背景下的证据综合。
混合方法研究非常适合于在不同的背景和观点中解决什么是有效知识的问题。本文介绍了证据权重作为一种变革性程序,供利益相关者解释、扩展和优先考虑来自证据综合的证据,重点是吸引历史上被排除在规划和决策之外的人群。本文介绍了程序的五个步骤,使用试点数据的围产期护理移民妇女在加拿大,从事家庭医生和分娩同伴。模糊认知映射提供了一种可访问和系统的方式来生成先验,以更新具有利益相关者优先级的已发表文献。证据权重是一个透明的程序,旨在扩大专业知识的范围,有助于更全面、具体和可操作的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mixed Methods Research
Journal of Mixed Methods Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
28.20%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mixed Methods Research serves as a premiere outlet for ground-breaking and seminal work in the field of mixed methods research. Of primary importance will be building an international and multidisciplinary community of mixed methods researchers. The journal''s scope includes exploring a global terminology and nomenclature for mixed methods research, delineating where mixed methods research may be used most effectively, creating the paradigmatic and philosophical foundations for mixed methods research, illuminating design and procedure issues, and determining the logistics of conducting mixed methods research. JMMR invites articles from a wide variety of international perspectives, including academics and practitioners from psychology, sociology, education, evaluation, health sciences, geography, communication, management, family studies, marketing, social work, and other related disciplines across the social, behavioral, and human sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信