Psychoanalytic therapy and narrative research interviewing: some reflections.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Philip John Archard, Michelle O'Reilly
{"title":"Psychoanalytic therapy and narrative research interviewing: some reflections.","authors":"Philip John Archard, Michelle O'Reilly","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This article focuses on approaches to qualitative research interviewing that draw direct inspiration from psychoanalytic therapy. The reflective discussion piece provides a critical spotlight on this method to promote reflection and ethical application.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To provide clarity regarding the meaning of psychoanalytically informed, psycho-social research and the interpretive nature of qualitative interviews and of therapy, and to reflect on nurse researchers' partiality for using quasi-dynamic interpretative comments and the sharing of formulations in interviews.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The authors review relevant literature, and comment on the apprehension and uncertainty researchers may experience with this type of research approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Researchers should consider how they conduct themselves as interviewers and what to share of the analysis of participants' accounts based on the specifics of the research, including their or their team's experience of conducting psychotherapy and their and participants' expectations about what may be therapeutic about interviews.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Psychoanalytically informed research interviewing should be used in a reflective way by nurse researchers with attention paid to the limitations and possibilities of parallels between psychotherapeutic and research interview dialogue.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1844","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This article focuses on approaches to qualitative research interviewing that draw direct inspiration from psychoanalytic therapy. The reflective discussion piece provides a critical spotlight on this method to promote reflection and ethical application.

Aim: To provide clarity regarding the meaning of psychoanalytically informed, psycho-social research and the interpretive nature of qualitative interviews and of therapy, and to reflect on nurse researchers' partiality for using quasi-dynamic interpretative comments and the sharing of formulations in interviews.

Discussion: The authors review relevant literature, and comment on the apprehension and uncertainty researchers may experience with this type of research approach.

Conclusion: Researchers should consider how they conduct themselves as interviewers and what to share of the analysis of participants' accounts based on the specifics of the research, including their or their team's experience of conducting psychotherapy and their and participants' expectations about what may be therapeutic about interviews.

Implications for practice: Psychoanalytically informed research interviewing should be used in a reflective way by nurse researchers with attention paid to the limitations and possibilities of parallels between psychotherapeutic and research interview dialogue.

精神分析疗法和叙事研究访谈:一些思考。
背景:本文重点介绍从精神分析疗法中汲取直接灵感的定性研究访谈方法。反思性讨论文章对这一方法进行了批判性聚焦,以促进反思和道德应用。目的:澄清精神分析知情、社会心理研究的含义,以及定性访谈和治疗的解释性质,并反思护士研究人员在访谈中使用准动态解释性评论和共享表述的偏颇之处:作者回顾了相关文献,并对研究人员在使用这类研究方法时可能会遇到的忧虑和不确定性进行了评论:研究人员应根据研究的具体情况,包括他们或其团队进行心理治疗的经验,以及他们和参与者对访谈可能具有治疗作用的预期,考虑他们作为访谈者的行为方式,以及在分析参与者的叙述时应分享哪些内容:实践启示:护士研究人员应以反思的方式使用精神分析研究访谈,并注意心理治疗与研究访谈对话之间的局限性和相似性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信