A pilot study of intraoperative intercostal nerve block during uniportal thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Annals of Thoracic Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-09 DOI:10.4103/atm.atm_128_22
Do Kyun Kang, Min Kyun Kang
{"title":"A pilot study of intraoperative intercostal nerve block during uniportal thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung.","authors":"Do Kyun Kang,&nbsp;Min Kyun Kang","doi":"10.4103/atm.atm_128_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Uniportal thoracoscopic surgery has been reported to result in alleviating the postoperative pain when compared with traditional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). However, postoperative pain is still the main concerns associated with thoracic surgeries. The objective of this study is to evaluate the postoperative pain of patients undergoing uniportal VATS, especially wedge resection, with the use of intraoperative intercostal nerve block.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients undergoing the uniportal VATS wedge resection between January 2019 and March 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Twenty consecutive patients in Group A underwent the uniportal VATS wedge resection without intraoperative intercostal nerve block. The other 20 consecutive patients in Group B underwent the uniportal VATS wedge resection with intraoperative intercostal nerve block. The numeric pain rating scale (NRS) scores were recorded at 1, 12, and 24 h, postoperatively. The number of opioid consumption was also recorded until the time to chest tube removal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference between groups with regard to sex, age, chest tube duration, length of stay, operative time, laterality time, and diagnosis. There was a significant difference in postoperative NRS scores at 1 h (<i>P</i> = 0.001) and 12 h (<i>P</i> = 0.022) between the groups. The opioid consumption was significantly in Group B lower than those in Group A (<i>P</i> = 0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intraoperative intercostal nerve block with bupivacaine provided immediate postoperative pain relief with reducing the postoperative opioid consumption compared in patients who underwent uniportal VATS, especially wedge resection of the lung.</p>","PeriodicalId":50760,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0c/31/ATM-17-180.PMC9374124.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/atm.atm_128_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and aims: Uniportal thoracoscopic surgery has been reported to result in alleviating the postoperative pain when compared with traditional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). However, postoperative pain is still the main concerns associated with thoracic surgeries. The objective of this study is to evaluate the postoperative pain of patients undergoing uniportal VATS, especially wedge resection, with the use of intraoperative intercostal nerve block.

Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing the uniportal VATS wedge resection between January 2019 and March 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Twenty consecutive patients in Group A underwent the uniportal VATS wedge resection without intraoperative intercostal nerve block. The other 20 consecutive patients in Group B underwent the uniportal VATS wedge resection with intraoperative intercostal nerve block. The numeric pain rating scale (NRS) scores were recorded at 1, 12, and 24 h, postoperatively. The number of opioid consumption was also recorded until the time to chest tube removal.

Results: There was no difference between groups with regard to sex, age, chest tube duration, length of stay, operative time, laterality time, and diagnosis. There was a significant difference in postoperative NRS scores at 1 h (P = 0.001) and 12 h (P = 0.022) between the groups. The opioid consumption was significantly in Group B lower than those in Group A (P = 0.025).

Conclusion: The intraoperative intercostal nerve block with bupivacaine provided immediate postoperative pain relief with reducing the postoperative opioid consumption compared in patients who underwent uniportal VATS, especially wedge resection of the lung.

Abstract Image

单门胸腔镜肺楔切术中肋间神经阻滞的初步研究。
背景和目的:与传统的视频胸腔镜手术(VATS)相比,单门胸腔镜手术可以减轻术后疼痛。然而,术后疼痛仍然是胸外科手术的主要问题。本研究的目的是评估采用术中肋间神经阻滞的单门VATS,特别是楔形切除术患者的术后疼痛。方法:回顾性分析2019年1月至2020年3月期间所有连续接受单门VATS楔形切除术的患者。A组连续20例患者行单门VATS楔形切除术,术中未行肋间神经阻滞。B组20例患者行单门静脉ats楔形切除术,术中肋间神经阻滞。分别于术后1、12、24小时记录疼痛评定量表(NRS)评分。同时记录阿片类药物的使用次数,直至取出胸管。结果:两组患者在性别、年龄、胸管时间、住院时间、手术时间、侧边时间、诊断等方面无差异。两组术后1 h (P = 0.001)和12 h (P = 0.022) NRS评分差异有统计学意义。B组阿片类药物用量明显低于A组(P = 0.025)。结论:术中布比卡因肋间神经阻滞与单门VATS相比,可立即缓解术后疼痛,减少术后阿片类药物的消耗,尤其是肺楔形切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Medicine
Annals of Thoracic Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of chest medicine, such as adult and pediatrics pulmonology, thoracic surgery, critical care medicine, respiratory care, transplantation, sleep medicine, related basic medical sciences, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review , and more. Editorials and communications to the editor that explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with chest medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信