Disparities in All-cancer and Lung Cancer Survival by Social, Behavioral, and Health Status Characteristics in the United States: A Longitudinal Follow-up of the 1997-2015 National Health Interview Survey-National Death Index Record Linkage Study.
{"title":"Disparities in All-cancer and Lung Cancer Survival by Social, Behavioral, and Health Status Characteristics in the United States: A Longitudinal Follow-up of the 1997-2015 National Health Interview Survey-National Death Index Record Linkage Study.","authors":"Hyunjung Lee, Gopal K Singh","doi":"10.15430/JCP.2022.27.2.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most research on cancer patient survival uses registry-based (e.g., SEER) incidence and survival data that have limited socioeconomic status and health-risk information. In this study, we used the 1997-2015 National Health Interview Survey-National Death Index prospectively-linked pooled cohort database (n = 40,291 cancer patients) to examine disparities in patient survival by a broad range of social determinants, including race/ethnicity, nativity, educational attainment, income/poverty level, occupation, housing tenure, physical and mental health status, smoking, physical activity, body mass index, and alcohol consumption. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate mortality hazard ratios and cause-specific 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival rates for all-cancer and lung cancer. During 1997-2015, the 10-year age-adjusted (all-cause) survival rate for cancer patients with professional and managerial occupations was 89.66%, significantly higher than the survival rate of 83.17% for laborers or 83.66% for the unemployed. Cancer patients with renting house had significantly lower age-adjusted survival rates than those owning house (82.65% vs. 85.80%). The 10-year age-adjusted survival rates were significantly greater among cancer patients with regular physical activity than those without regular physical activity (90.18% vs. 83.24%). Age-adjusted survival rates were significantly reduced for cancer patients with lower income and education, poor health, and serious psychological distress, and among current and former smokers. The gap in survival narrowed with additional sociodemographic, health, or behavioral adjustment. Similarly large differentials were found in lung cancer survival. Marked disparities in all-cancer and lung cancer survival were found by a wide range of sociodemographic and health characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":15120,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Prevention","volume":"27 2","pages":"89-100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/21/cf/jcp-27-2-89.PMC9271407.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2022.27.2.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Most research on cancer patient survival uses registry-based (e.g., SEER) incidence and survival data that have limited socioeconomic status and health-risk information. In this study, we used the 1997-2015 National Health Interview Survey-National Death Index prospectively-linked pooled cohort database (n = 40,291 cancer patients) to examine disparities in patient survival by a broad range of social determinants, including race/ethnicity, nativity, educational attainment, income/poverty level, occupation, housing tenure, physical and mental health status, smoking, physical activity, body mass index, and alcohol consumption. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate mortality hazard ratios and cause-specific 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival rates for all-cancer and lung cancer. During 1997-2015, the 10-year age-adjusted (all-cause) survival rate for cancer patients with professional and managerial occupations was 89.66%, significantly higher than the survival rate of 83.17% for laborers or 83.66% for the unemployed. Cancer patients with renting house had significantly lower age-adjusted survival rates than those owning house (82.65% vs. 85.80%). The 10-year age-adjusted survival rates were significantly greater among cancer patients with regular physical activity than those without regular physical activity (90.18% vs. 83.24%). Age-adjusted survival rates were significantly reduced for cancer patients with lower income and education, poor health, and serious psychological distress, and among current and former smokers. The gap in survival narrowed with additional sociodemographic, health, or behavioral adjustment. Similarly large differentials were found in lung cancer survival. Marked disparities in all-cancer and lung cancer survival were found by a wide range of sociodemographic and health characteristics.
大多数关于癌症患者生存的研究使用基于登记的(例如,SEER)发病率和生存数据,这些数据具有有限的社会经济地位和健康风险信息。在这项研究中,我们使用了1997-2015年全国健康访谈调查-全国死亡指数前瞻性关联的合并队列数据库(n = 40,291名癌症患者),通过广泛的社会决定因素来检查患者生存的差异,包括种族/民族、出生、受教育程度、收入/贫困水平、职业、住房年限、身心健康状况、吸烟、体育活动、体重指数和饮酒。我们使用Cox比例风险模型来估计所有癌症和肺癌的死亡率风险比和病因特异性的1年、5年和10年生存率。1997-2015年,从事专业和管理职业的癌症患者10年经年龄调整(全因)生存率为89.66%,显著高于劳动者的83.17%和失业人员的83.66%。租房癌症患者的年龄调整生存率明显低于自有住房癌症患者(82.65% vs. 85.80%)。有规律体育锻炼的癌症患者10年年龄调整生存率明显高于无规律体育锻炼的癌症患者(90.18% vs. 83.24%)。对于收入和受教育程度较低、健康状况不佳、心理困扰严重的癌症患者,以及目前和曾经吸烟的癌症患者,年龄调整后的生存率显著降低。随着额外的社会人口、健康或行为调整,生存差距缩小。在肺癌存活率方面也发现了类似的巨大差异。通过广泛的社会人口统计学和健康特征,发现了所有癌症和肺癌生存率的显著差异。