When Social Work Client Self-Determination Principle Meets Confucius Culture: A Living Will Decision-Making Case Study in China.

Omega Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-08 DOI:10.1177/00302228221117864
Wu Sun, Qingning Zhang, Serge Lee, Zhanlin Luo
{"title":"When Social Work Client Self-Determination Principle Meets Confucius Culture: A Living Will Decision-Making Case Study in China.","authors":"Wu Sun, Qingning Zhang, Serge Lee, Zhanlin Luo","doi":"10.1177/00302228221117864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>. In western countries like the United States of America, living will is seen as a vehicle for achieving greater wisdom and skill in a fundamental aspect of health care and a civilized approach to mortality. However, the inception of living will in China emerged only a decade ago. Although, nowadays, Chinese medical social workers can provide living will service in health settings, their services are in a preliminary status. <i>Objective</i>. This exploratory case study aims to present an ethical dilemma and analyzes the reasons the social work client self-determination principle failed in living will decision-making in the oncology ward that has Confucius as a cultural context. <i>Results</i>. This case illustrates that the patient's family has the final say in living will decision-making. The social work principle of client self-determination exemplifies the difficulties of applying medical social work practices with living will to Chinese patients in hospital wards. <i>Conclusions</i>. Chinese patients and their families are still bound to Confucianism's long tradition. In China, individuals are still being defined by relationships, and the \"self\" exists only in a hierarchical interpersonal network known as the differential pattern. The Chinese people do not like to talk about death. Even in modern society, it will take time for the Chinese people to come to terms with the end-of-life planning with living will, mainly for cancer patients after diagnosis. <i>Practice Implications</i>. Future social work practices that implied living will similar to this case that has Confucius culture in the background should consider the cultural context where the social worker-client are situated and the types of social work values the profession hold.</p>","PeriodicalId":74338,"journal":{"name":"Omega","volume":" ","pages":"1177-1192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228221117864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. In western countries like the United States of America, living will is seen as a vehicle for achieving greater wisdom and skill in a fundamental aspect of health care and a civilized approach to mortality. However, the inception of living will in China emerged only a decade ago. Although, nowadays, Chinese medical social workers can provide living will service in health settings, their services are in a preliminary status. Objective. This exploratory case study aims to present an ethical dilemma and analyzes the reasons the social work client self-determination principle failed in living will decision-making in the oncology ward that has Confucius as a cultural context. Results. This case illustrates that the patient's family has the final say in living will decision-making. The social work principle of client self-determination exemplifies the difficulties of applying medical social work practices with living will to Chinese patients in hospital wards. Conclusions. Chinese patients and their families are still bound to Confucianism's long tradition. In China, individuals are still being defined by relationships, and the "self" exists only in a hierarchical interpersonal network known as the differential pattern. The Chinese people do not like to talk about death. Even in modern society, it will take time for the Chinese people to come to terms with the end-of-life planning with living will, mainly for cancer patients after diagnosis. Practice Implications. Future social work practices that implied living will similar to this case that has Confucius culture in the background should consider the cultural context where the social worker-client are situated and the types of social work values the profession hold.

当社会工作服务对象自决原则遇上孔子文化:中国生前遗嘱决策案例研究。
背景。在美国等西方国家,生前预嘱被视为在医疗保健的一个基本方面实现更高智慧和技能的载体,也是一种文明的死亡方式。然而,在中国,生前预嘱的出现不过是十年前的事。虽然现在中国的医务社工可以在医疗机构中提供生前预嘱服务,但其服务还处于初级阶段。研究目的本探索性案例研究旨在提出一个伦理困境,并分析以孔子为文化背景的肿瘤病房中生前预嘱决策中社工服务对象自决原则失败的原因。研究结果本案例说明患者家属在生前预嘱决策中拥有最终决定权。当事人自决的社会工作原则体现了将生前预嘱的医务社会工作实践应用于医院病房中的中国病人的困难。结论。中国病人及其家属仍然受到儒家思想悠久传统的束缚。在中国,个人仍然由关系定义,"自我 "只存在于被称为差序格局的等级人际网络中。中国人不喜欢谈论死亡。即使在现代社会,中国人也需要时间来接受以生前预嘱为基础的临终规划,主要是针对确诊后的癌症患者。实践意义。在未来的社会工作实践中,如果出现与本案例类似的以孔子文化为背景的生前预嘱,就应该考虑到社会工作者与服务对象所处的文化背景,以及社会工作专业所持有的价值观类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信