Psychometric properties of Persian version of depression literacy (D-Lit) questionnaire among general population.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Hadi Tehrani, Mahbobeh Nejatian, Mahdi Moshki, Alireza Jafari
{"title":"Psychometric properties of Persian version of depression literacy (D-Lit) questionnaire among general population.","authors":"Hadi Tehrani,&nbsp;Mahbobeh Nejatian,&nbsp;Mahdi Moshki,&nbsp;Alireza Jafari","doi":"10.1186/s13033-022-00550-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of depression in society is increasing and there is a need for a suitable tool to assess the health literacy of people in this field. This study was conducted to evaluate the psychometric of the Iranian version of the depression literacy (D-Lit) questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted on 845 participants with a proportional stratified sampling method. First, the translation and cultural adaptation of questionnaire was performed. Then, the validity of D-Lit was assessed by face validity, content validity, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The reliability of D-Lit was assessed by the Cronbach's alpha coefficient and McDonald omega coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the results of EFA, 5 factors emerged with eigenvalues of greater than 1, which accounted for 56.30% of the variance. Based on the results of CFA, one question was deleted and the results of goodness fit indexes confirmed the model. Cronbach's alpha coefficient and McDonald omega coefficient for D-Lit questionnaire were 0.890 and 0.891, respectively. Finally, D-Lit questionnaire with 21 questions and 5 subscales of Knowledge of the psychological symptoms (5 items), Knowledge about the effectiveness of available treatment methods (4 items), Knowledge about cognitive-behavioral symptoms (6 items), Knowledge about taking medications and their side effects (4 items), and Knowledge of the severity of the disease (2 items) were confirmed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this psychometric evaluation confirmed the Persian version of D-Lit questionnaire with 21 questions and 5 subscales is an appropriate tool for measuring people's literacy about depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":47752,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372931/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-022-00550-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of depression in society is increasing and there is a need for a suitable tool to assess the health literacy of people in this field. This study was conducted to evaluate the psychometric of the Iranian version of the depression literacy (D-Lit) questionnaire.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 845 participants with a proportional stratified sampling method. First, the translation and cultural adaptation of questionnaire was performed. Then, the validity of D-Lit was assessed by face validity, content validity, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The reliability of D-Lit was assessed by the Cronbach's alpha coefficient and McDonald omega coefficient.

Results: Based on the results of EFA, 5 factors emerged with eigenvalues of greater than 1, which accounted for 56.30% of the variance. Based on the results of CFA, one question was deleted and the results of goodness fit indexes confirmed the model. Cronbach's alpha coefficient and McDonald omega coefficient for D-Lit questionnaire were 0.890 and 0.891, respectively. Finally, D-Lit questionnaire with 21 questions and 5 subscales of Knowledge of the psychological symptoms (5 items), Knowledge about the effectiveness of available treatment methods (4 items), Knowledge about cognitive-behavioral symptoms (6 items), Knowledge about taking medications and their side effects (4 items), and Knowledge of the severity of the disease (2 items) were confirmed.

Conclusion: The results of this psychometric evaluation confirmed the Persian version of D-Lit questionnaire with 21 questions and 5 subscales is an appropriate tool for measuring people's literacy about depression.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

波斯语抑郁素养问卷在普通人群中的心理测量特征。
背景:抑郁症在社会中的患病率正在上升,需要一种合适的工具来评估人们在这一领域的健康素养。本研究旨在评估伊朗版抑郁素养(D-Lit)问卷的心理测量学。方法:采用比例分层抽样方法,对845名被试进行横断面研究。首先,对问卷进行翻译和文化适配。然后,采用面孔效度、内容效度、探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)对D-Lit的效度进行评估。采用Cronbach's alpha系数和McDonald - omega系数评估D-Lit的可靠性。结果:根据EFA结果,有5个因素的特征值大于1,占方差的56.30%。根据CFA的结果,删除了一个问题,优度拟合指标的结果证实了模型。D-Lit问卷的Cronbach’s alpha系数和McDonald’s omega系数分别为0.890和0.891。最后采用D-Lit问卷,共21题,共5个分量表,分别为心理症状知识(5项)、现有治疗方法有效性知识(4项)、认知行为症状知识(6项)、用药及副作用知识(4项)、疾病严重程度知识(2项)。结论:波斯语D-Lit问卷共21题,5个分量表,是一种测量人们抑郁素养的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信