Prognostic Role of the Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Reperfusion Therapy: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.6 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Central Nervous System Disease Pub Date : 2022-07-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11795735221110373
Divyansh Sharma, Sonu M M Bhaskar
{"title":"Prognostic Role of the Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Reperfusion Therapy: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Divyansh Sharma, Sonu M M Bhaskar","doi":"10.1177/11795735221110373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both inflammation and thrombotic/hemostatic mechanisms may play a role in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) pathogenesis, and a biomarker, such as the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), considering both mechanisms may be of clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This meta-analysis sought to examine the effect of PLR on functional outcomes, early neurological changes, bleeding complications, mortality, and adverse outcomes in AIS patients treated with reperfusion therapy (RT).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>Individual studies were retrieved from the PubMed/Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. References thereof were also consulted. Data were extracted using a standardised data sheet, and systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the association of admission (pre-RT) or delayed (post-RT) PLR with defined clinical and safety outcomes were conducted. In the case of multiple delayed PLR timepoints, the timepoint closest to 24 hours was selected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies (n=4878) were identified for the systematic review, of which 14 (n=4413) were included in the meta-analyses. PLR collected at admission was significantly negatively associated with 90-day good functional outcomes (SMD=-.32; 95% CI = -.58 to -.05; P=.020; z=-2.328), as was PLR collected at delayed timepoints (SMD=-.43; 95% CI = -.54 to -.32; P<.0001; z=-7.454). PLR at delayed timepoints was also significantly negatively associated with ENI (SMD=-.18; 95% CI = -.29 to -.08; P=.001. Conversely, the study suggested that a higher PLR at delayed timepoints may be associated with radiological bleeding and mortality. The results varied based on the type of RT administered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A higher PLR is associated with worse outcomes after stroke in terms of morbidity, mortality, and safety outcomes after stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":15218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/52/c7/10.1177_11795735221110373.PMC9290168.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795735221110373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Both inflammation and thrombotic/hemostatic mechanisms may play a role in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) pathogenesis, and a biomarker, such as the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), considering both mechanisms may be of clinical utility.

Objectives: This meta-analysis sought to examine the effect of PLR on functional outcomes, early neurological changes, bleeding complications, mortality, and adverse outcomes in AIS patients treated with reperfusion therapy (RT).

Design: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Data sources and methods: Individual studies were retrieved from the PubMed/Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. References thereof were also consulted. Data were extracted using a standardised data sheet, and systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the association of admission (pre-RT) or delayed (post-RT) PLR with defined clinical and safety outcomes were conducted. In the case of multiple delayed PLR timepoints, the timepoint closest to 24 hours was selected.

Results: Eighteen studies (n=4878) were identified for the systematic review, of which 14 (n=4413) were included in the meta-analyses. PLR collected at admission was significantly negatively associated with 90-day good functional outcomes (SMD=-.32; 95% CI = -.58 to -.05; P=.020; z=-2.328), as was PLR collected at delayed timepoints (SMD=-.43; 95% CI = -.54 to -.32; P<.0001; z=-7.454). PLR at delayed timepoints was also significantly negatively associated with ENI (SMD=-.18; 95% CI = -.29 to -.08; P=.001. Conversely, the study suggested that a higher PLR at delayed timepoints may be associated with radiological bleeding and mortality. The results varied based on the type of RT administered.

Conclusions: A higher PLR is associated with worse outcomes after stroke in terms of morbidity, mortality, and safety outcomes after stroke.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

接受再灌注治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者血小板-淋巴细胞比值的预后作用:一项 Meta 分析。
背景:炎症和血栓/止血机制都可能在急性缺血性卒中(AIS)发病机制中发挥作用,考虑这两种机制的生物标志物(如血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR))可能具有临床实用性:这项荟萃分析旨在研究 PLR 对接受再灌注疗法(RT)治疗的 AIS 患者的功能预后、早期神经系统变化、出血并发症、死亡率和不良预后的影响:数据来源和方法:从 PubMed/Medline、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库中检索各项研究。此外,还查阅了相关参考文献。使用标准化数据表提取数据,并就入院(RT 前)或延迟(RT 后)PLR 与定义的临床和安全性结果的相关性进行系统综述和荟萃分析。如果存在多个延迟 PLR 时间点,则选择最接近 24 小时的时间点:系统综述确定了 18 项研究(n=4878),其中 14 项研究(n=4413)被纳入荟萃分析。入院时收集的PLR与90天良好功能预后呈显著负相关(SMD=-.32;95% CI = -.58 to -.05;P=.020;z=-2.328),延迟时间点收集的PLR也是如此(SMD=-.43;95% CI = -.54 to -.32;PC结论:就发病率、死亡率和安全性而言,较高的 PLR 与中风后较差的预后相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信