Pretreatment with Low-Dose Esketamine for Reduction of Propofol Injection Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2022-08-02 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/4289905
Danyun Fu, Dingding Wang, Wenxian Li, Yuan Han, Jie Jia
{"title":"Pretreatment with Low-Dose Esketamine for Reduction of Propofol Injection Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Danyun Fu,&nbsp;Dingding Wang,&nbsp;Wenxian Li,&nbsp;Yuan Han,&nbsp;Jie Jia","doi":"10.1155/2022/4289905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Propofol-induced injection pain is a common adverse effect during the induction of general anesthesia. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of low-dose esketamine in preventing propofol injection pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, patients scheduled for elective ear surgery under general anesthesia received either normal saline (NS), or 40 mg lidocaine, or 0.15 mg/kg esketamine 30 seconds before manual injection of propofol. The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of propofol injection pain. The secondary outcomes included injection pain score, vital signs, total dosage of vasoactive drugs used within 5 minutes after induction, and adverse events related to drugs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 105 patients were included. Compared with the NS group (67%), pretreatment with esketamine and lidocaine significantly reduced the incidence of injection pain to 29% and 33%, respectively (both <i>P</i> < 0.05); however, no significant difference was found between the esketamine and lidocaine groups. The median of injection pain score was significantly lower in the esketamine and lidocaine groups (both median (interquartile range) = 0 (0-1)) than that in the NS group (1 (0-2); <i>P</i> < 0.05). In addition, compared with the NS and lidocaine groups, preinjection esketamine provided more stable hemodynamic parameters within 5 minutes after induction (<i>P</i> < 0.05). No statistical difference was found in adverse events among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pretreatment with a low-dose esketamine can not only reduce the incidence of propofol injection pain but also provide a more stable circulation in patients after anesthesia induction. This convenient, well-tolerated, and economic treatment appears as an option to be routinely applied in clinic practice. <i>Clinical Trial Registration.</i> This trial is registered with https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=136690 (the number for the trial registration isChiCTR2100052742).</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363235/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4289905","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Propofol-induced injection pain is a common adverse effect during the induction of general anesthesia. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of low-dose esketamine in preventing propofol injection pain.

Methods: In this double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, patients scheduled for elective ear surgery under general anesthesia received either normal saline (NS), or 40 mg lidocaine, or 0.15 mg/kg esketamine 30 seconds before manual injection of propofol. The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of propofol injection pain. The secondary outcomes included injection pain score, vital signs, total dosage of vasoactive drugs used within 5 minutes after induction, and adverse events related to drugs.

Results: A total of 105 patients were included. Compared with the NS group (67%), pretreatment with esketamine and lidocaine significantly reduced the incidence of injection pain to 29% and 33%, respectively (both P < 0.05); however, no significant difference was found between the esketamine and lidocaine groups. The median of injection pain score was significantly lower in the esketamine and lidocaine groups (both median (interquartile range) = 0 (0-1)) than that in the NS group (1 (0-2); P < 0.05). In addition, compared with the NS and lidocaine groups, preinjection esketamine provided more stable hemodynamic parameters within 5 minutes after induction (P < 0.05). No statistical difference was found in adverse events among the three groups.

Conclusions: Pretreatment with a low-dose esketamine can not only reduce the incidence of propofol injection pain but also provide a more stable circulation in patients after anesthesia induction. This convenient, well-tolerated, and economic treatment appears as an option to be routinely applied in clinic practice. Clinical Trial Registration. This trial is registered with https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=136690 (the number for the trial registration isChiCTR2100052742).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

低剂量艾氯胺酮预处理减少异丙酚注射疼痛:一项随机对照试验。
背景:异丙酚引起的注射痛是全麻诱导过程中常见的不良反应。本研究旨在探讨小剂量艾氯胺酮在预防异丙酚注射痛中的作用。方法:在这项双盲、随机、对照试验中,计划在全身麻醉下进行择期耳部手术的患者在手动注射异丙酚前30秒接受生理盐水(NS)或40 mg利多卡因或0.15 mg/kg艾氯胺酮。这项研究的主要结果是异丙酚注射疼痛的发生率。次要结局包括注射疼痛评分、生命体征、诱导后5分钟内使用的血管活性药物总剂量、药物相关不良事件。结果:共纳入105例患者。与NS组(67%)相比,艾氯胺酮和利多卡因预处理显著降低注射痛发生率,分别为29%和33% (P均< 0.05);然而,在艾氯胺酮组和利多卡因组之间没有发现显著差异。艾氯胺酮组和利多卡因组注射疼痛评分中位数(均为0(0-1))明显低于NS组(1 (0-2));P < 0.05)。此外,与NS组和利多卡因组相比,注射前艾氯胺酮诱导后5分钟内血流动力学参数更稳定(P < 0.05)。三组不良事件发生率无统计学差异。结论:小剂量艾氯胺酮预处理不仅可以减少异丙酚注射痛的发生率,而且可以使麻醉诱导后患者的循环更加稳定。这种方便、耐受性好、经济的治疗方法似乎是临床实践中常规应用的一种选择。临床试验注册。该试验在https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=136690注册(试验注册号为chictr2100052742)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信