Performance of the Colloidal Gold Immunochromatography of Cryptococcal Antigen on Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Cryptococcosis.

IF 2.6
Ning Zhu, Shanhong Lin, Xingbei Weng, Weijie Sun, Xueqin Chen
{"title":"Performance of the Colloidal Gold Immunochromatography of Cryptococcal Antigen on Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Cryptococcosis.","authors":"Ning Zhu,&nbsp;Shanhong Lin,&nbsp;Xingbei Weng,&nbsp;Weijie Sun,&nbsp;Xueqin Chen","doi":"10.1155/2022/7876030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the colloidal gold immunochromatography method in the detection of <i>Cryptococcus</i> antigen in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) for pulmonary cryptococcosis (PC) diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 111 patients with clinically suspected PC who were finally diagnosed with nonhuman immunodeficiency virus infection and hospitalized in the Ningbo First Hospital from March 2017 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. All the confirmed cases were divided into two groups as follows: the PC group (33 cases) and the non-PC group (78 cases). All the patients were subjected to serum and BALF cryptococcal capsular polysaccharide antigen-lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (CrAg-LFA) and etiological culturing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the PC group, serum CrAg-LFA was positive for 24 and negative for 9 cases, serum <i>Cryptococcus</i> culture was positive for 1 and negative for 32 cases, BALF CrAg-LFA was positive for 31 and negative for 2 cases, and BALF <i>Cryptococcus</i> culture was positive for 9 and negative for 24 cases. In the non-PC group, serum CrAg-LFA was positive for 1 and negative for 77 cases, serum culture was negative in all the cases, and both BALF CrAg-LFA and culture were negative in all the cases. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of BALF CrAg-LFA for PC diagnosis were 93.9%, 100%, and 98.2%, respectively, whereas those of BALF culture were 27.3%, 100%, and 78.4%, respectively. The sensitivity and accuracy of BALF CrAg-LFA were higher than that of serum CrAg-LFA and BALF etiological culture with statistically significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diagnostic value of BALF CrAg-LFA for PC is superior to that of serum CrAg-LFA and BALF etiological culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":520793,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale","volume":" ","pages":"7876030"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9288310/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7876030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the colloidal gold immunochromatography method in the detection of Cryptococcus antigen in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) for pulmonary cryptococcosis (PC) diagnosis.

Methods: A total of 111 patients with clinically suspected PC who were finally diagnosed with nonhuman immunodeficiency virus infection and hospitalized in the Ningbo First Hospital from March 2017 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. All the confirmed cases were divided into two groups as follows: the PC group (33 cases) and the non-PC group (78 cases). All the patients were subjected to serum and BALF cryptococcal capsular polysaccharide antigen-lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (CrAg-LFA) and etiological culturing.

Results: In the PC group, serum CrAg-LFA was positive for 24 and negative for 9 cases, serum Cryptococcus culture was positive for 1 and negative for 32 cases, BALF CrAg-LFA was positive for 31 and negative for 2 cases, and BALF Cryptococcus culture was positive for 9 and negative for 24 cases. In the non-PC group, serum CrAg-LFA was positive for 1 and negative for 77 cases, serum culture was negative in all the cases, and both BALF CrAg-LFA and culture were negative in all the cases. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of BALF CrAg-LFA for PC diagnosis were 93.9%, 100%, and 98.2%, respectively, whereas those of BALF culture were 27.3%, 100%, and 78.4%, respectively. The sensitivity and accuracy of BALF CrAg-LFA were higher than that of serum CrAg-LFA and BALF etiological culture with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The diagnostic value of BALF CrAg-LFA for PC is superior to that of serum CrAg-LFA and BALF etiological culture.

隐球菌抗原胶体金免疫层析在支气管肺泡灌洗液诊断肺隐球菌病中的应用。
目的:探讨胶体金免疫层析法检测支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)中隐球菌抗原对肺隐球菌病(PC)的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析2017年3月至2021年12月在宁波市第一医院住院的111例最终诊断为非人类免疫缺陷病毒感染的临床疑似PC患者。所有确诊病例分为两组:PC组(33例)和非PC组(78例)。所有患者进行血清和BALF隐球菌荚膜多糖抗原侧流免疫层析(CrAg-LFA)和病原学培养。结果:PC组血清CrAg-LFA阳性24例,阴性9例,血清隐球菌培养阳性1例,阴性32例,BALF CrAg-LFA阳性31例,阴性2例,BALF隐球菌培养阳性9例,阴性24例。非pc组血清CrAg-LFA阳性1例,阴性77例,血清培养均为阴性,BALF CrAg-LFA和培养均为阴性。BALF CrAg-LFA诊断PC的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为93.9%、100%和98.2%,而BALF培养诊断PC的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为27.3%、100%和78.4%。BALF CrAg-LFA的敏感性和准确性均高于血清CrAg-LFA和BALF病原学培养,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:BALF - CrAg-LFA对PC的诊断价值优于血清CrAg-LFA和BALF病原学培养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书