Manufacturing artificial bone allografts: a perspective.

Biomaterials Translational Pub Date : 2022-03-28 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.12336/biomatertransl.2022.01.007
Emma Steijvers, Armaan Ghei, Zhidao Xia
{"title":"Manufacturing artificial bone allografts: a perspective.","authors":"Emma Steijvers,&nbsp;Armaan Ghei,&nbsp;Zhidao Xia","doi":"10.12336/biomatertransl.2022.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bone grafts have traditionally come from four sources: the patients' own tissue (autograft), tissue from a living or cadaveric human donor (allograft), animal donors (xenograft) and synthetic artificial biomaterials (ceramics, cement, polymers, and metal). However, all of these have advantages and drawbacks. The most commercially successful bone grafts so far are allografts, which hold 57% of the current bone graft market; however, disease transmission and scarcity are still significant drawbacks limiting their use. Tissue-engineered grafts have great potential, in which human stem cells and synthetical biomaterials are combined to produce bone-like tissue in vitro, but this is yet to be approved for widespread clinical practice. It is hypothesised that artificial bone allografts can be mass-manufactured to replace conventional bone allografts through refined bone tissue engineering prior to decellularisation. This review article aims to review current literature on (1) conventional bone allograft preparation; (2) bone tissue engineering including the use of synthetic biomaterials as bone graft substitute scaffolds, combined with osteogenic stem cells in vitro; (3) potential artificial allograft manufacturing processes, including mass production of engineered bone tissue, osteogenic enhancement, decellularisation, sterilisation and safety assurance for regulatory approval. From these assessments, a practical route map for mass production of artificial allografts for clinical use is proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":58820,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterials Translational","volume":"3 1","pages":"65-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0f/1c/bt-03-01-65.PMC9255790.pdf","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterials Translational","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12336/biomatertransl.2022.01.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Bone grafts have traditionally come from four sources: the patients' own tissue (autograft), tissue from a living or cadaveric human donor (allograft), animal donors (xenograft) and synthetic artificial biomaterials (ceramics, cement, polymers, and metal). However, all of these have advantages and drawbacks. The most commercially successful bone grafts so far are allografts, which hold 57% of the current bone graft market; however, disease transmission and scarcity are still significant drawbacks limiting their use. Tissue-engineered grafts have great potential, in which human stem cells and synthetical biomaterials are combined to produce bone-like tissue in vitro, but this is yet to be approved for widespread clinical practice. It is hypothesised that artificial bone allografts can be mass-manufactured to replace conventional bone allografts through refined bone tissue engineering prior to decellularisation. This review article aims to review current literature on (1) conventional bone allograft preparation; (2) bone tissue engineering including the use of synthetic biomaterials as bone graft substitute scaffolds, combined with osteogenic stem cells in vitro; (3) potential artificial allograft manufacturing processes, including mass production of engineered bone tissue, osteogenic enhancement, decellularisation, sterilisation and safety assurance for regulatory approval. From these assessments, a practical route map for mass production of artificial allografts for clinical use is proposed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人造异体骨移植的制造:一个视角。
骨移植传统上有四种来源:患者自身组织(自体移植物)、活体或尸体供体组织(同种异体移植物)、动物供体(异种移植物)和人工合成生物材料(陶瓷、水泥、聚合物和金属)。然而,所有这些都有优点和缺点。迄今为止,商业上最成功的骨移植是同种异体骨移植,占当前骨移植市场的57%;然而,疾病传播和稀缺性仍然是限制其使用的重大缺陷。组织工程移植具有巨大的潜力,其中人类干细胞和合成生物材料相结合,在体外产生骨样组织,但这尚未被批准用于广泛的临床实践。据推测,在脱细胞之前,通过精细的骨组织工程,人工同种异体骨移植物可以大规模生产以取代传统的同种异体骨移植物。本文综述了目前关于(1)传统同种异体骨移植制备的文献;(2)骨组织工程,包括使用合成生物材料作为骨移植替代支架,结合体外成骨干细胞;(3)潜在的人工同种异体移植物制造工艺,包括工程骨组织的大规模生产、成骨增强、脱细胞、灭菌和监管部门批准的安全保证。根据这些评估,提出了用于临床使用的人工同种异体移植物大规模生产的实际路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信