National Guard Response to COVID-19: A Snapshot in Time during the Pandemic.

Joshua K Radi, Cesar A Allen, Jeffrey A Anderson
{"title":"National Guard Response to COVID-19: A Snapshot in Time during the Pandemic.","authors":"Joshua K Radi,&nbsp;Cesar A Allen,&nbsp;Jeffrey A Anderson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since March of 2020, thousands of National Guard service members have played a key role in the domestic response to COVID-19, ranging from medical support, health screening, decontamination, personal protective equipment (PPE) training, and more. As a result of these missions, there was a hypothesized potential increase in COVID-19 exposure risk.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Assess COVID-19 transmission rates and mortality rates in the US population compared to the National Guard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six months of retrospective data were assessed with analysis of a snapshot in time for pandemic data on 29 July 2020. Potential relationships between National Guard COVID-19 response personnel, cumulative US COVID-19 cases, National Guard COVID-19 cases, and National Guard COVID-19 fatalities were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No evidence of correlations exist between the number of National Guard personnel supporting the COVID-19 response and the number of deaths in the National Guard due to COVID-19 (p=0.547), and the number of National Guard COVID-19 cases and the number of deaths in the National Guard due to COVID-19 (p=0.214). The number of COVID-19 cases in the US was positively correlated to the number of deaths in the US due to COVID-19 (rs=0.947, p is less than.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though much of the data could not be reported due to operational security (OPSEC) and capabilities, activities, limitations, and intentions (CALI) concerns, the data herein demonstrate National Guard service members are significantly less likely to suffer COVID-19 related mortality compared to US civilians. Since the National Guard adheres the same medical and physical fitness standards as set by their parent service (Army and Air Force), it follows overall levels of medical readiness and fitness should start with a higher baseline. Age, medical screening, PPE, and physical fitness requirements have likely contributed to this phenomenon. These results should empower National Guard service members to feel more confident in their roles as they continue to support the COVID-19 response efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":74148,"journal":{"name":"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since March of 2020, thousands of National Guard service members have played a key role in the domestic response to COVID-19, ranging from medical support, health screening, decontamination, personal protective equipment (PPE) training, and more. As a result of these missions, there was a hypothesized potential increase in COVID-19 exposure risk.

Objectives: Assess COVID-19 transmission rates and mortality rates in the US population compared to the National Guard.

Methods: Six months of retrospective data were assessed with analysis of a snapshot in time for pandemic data on 29 July 2020. Potential relationships between National Guard COVID-19 response personnel, cumulative US COVID-19 cases, National Guard COVID-19 cases, and National Guard COVID-19 fatalities were assessed.

Results: No evidence of correlations exist between the number of National Guard personnel supporting the COVID-19 response and the number of deaths in the National Guard due to COVID-19 (p=0.547), and the number of National Guard COVID-19 cases and the number of deaths in the National Guard due to COVID-19 (p=0.214). The number of COVID-19 cases in the US was positively correlated to the number of deaths in the US due to COVID-19 (rs=0.947, p is less than.001).

Conclusions: Though much of the data could not be reported due to operational security (OPSEC) and capabilities, activities, limitations, and intentions (CALI) concerns, the data herein demonstrate National Guard service members are significantly less likely to suffer COVID-19 related mortality compared to US civilians. Since the National Guard adheres the same medical and physical fitness standards as set by their parent service (Army and Air Force), it follows overall levels of medical readiness and fitness should start with a higher baseline. Age, medical screening, PPE, and physical fitness requirements have likely contributed to this phenomenon. These results should empower National Guard service members to feel more confident in their roles as they continue to support the COVID-19 response efforts.

国民警卫队对COVID-19的反应:大流行期间的及时快照。
背景:自2020年3月以来,数千名国民警卫队成员在国内应对COVID-19方面发挥了关键作用,包括医疗支持、健康筛查、去污、个人防护装备(PPE)培训等。由于这些任务,假设COVID-19暴露风险可能会增加。目的:评估与国民警卫队相比,美国人口中COVID-19的传播率和死亡率。方法:对6个月的回顾性数据进行评估,并对2020年7月29日大流行数据及时快照进行分析。评估了国民警卫队COVID-19应对人员、美国累积COVID-19病例、国民警卫队COVID-19病例和国民警卫队COVID-19死亡人数之间的潜在关系。结果:支持COVID-19应对的国民警卫队人员人数与因COVID-19死亡的国民警卫队人数之间不存在相关性(p=0.547),国民警卫队COVID-19病例数与因COVID-19死亡的国民警卫队人数之间不存在相关性(p=0.214)。美国新冠肺炎病例数与美国新冠肺炎死亡人数呈正相关(rs=0.947, p < 0.001)。结论:尽管由于操作安全(OPSEC)和能力、活动、限制和意图(CALI)方面的考虑,许多数据无法报告,但本文的数据表明,与美国平民相比,国民警卫队服务人员遭受COVID-19相关死亡率的可能性要低得多。由于国民警卫队遵循与其所属军种(陆军和空军)相同的医疗和身体健康标准,因此其总体医疗准备水平和健康水平应从较高的基线开始。年龄、医疗筛查、个人防护装备和体能要求可能是造成这一现象的原因。这些结果将使国民警卫队的服务人员在继续支持COVID-19应对工作时对自己的角色更有信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信