Determining the management of pain in people with spinal cord injury by physiotherapists in South Africa.

IF 1 Q4 REHABILITATION
South African Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2022-07-27 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1767
Bernice James, Mokgadi K Mashola, Diphale J Mothabeng
{"title":"Determining the management of pain in people with spinal cord injury by physiotherapists in South Africa.","authors":"Bernice James,&nbsp;Mokgadi K Mashola,&nbsp;Diphale J Mothabeng","doi":"10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain after spinal cord injury (SCI) is common, and physiotherapy plays a pivotal role in alleviating pain for people with SCI.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the modalities that physiotherapists in South Africa use to treat SCI-related pain and the factors that guide the selection of treatment modalities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A quantitative, cross-sectional design using a self-developed online survey was distributed to physiotherapists belonging to the South African Society of Physiotherapy and the Physiotherapy Association of South Africa. Data were analysed using SPSS v26, where descriptive data were analysed using frequency, percentages, means and standard deviations, and Fisher's exact tests for inferential analyses. Open-ended questions underwent thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-six responses were received. The most-used modalities were transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (29.8%), exercises (27.7%) and joint mobilisations (29.8%). Most physiotherapists used standardised measurements to objectively assess pain characteristics, with the visual analog scale being the most used (70.2%). Except for the cost of treatment, the factors that guided the selection of the modalities included the pain type, onset, duration, location and intensity, pain interference, duration of treatment, patient's preferences, other treatments that the patient was receiving for pain and psychosocial factors (87.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Local physiotherapists use pain management modalities that are supported by the evidence to treat SCI-related pain.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>This study highlights the common modalities used by physiotherapists to treat SCI-related pain, as well as the selection criteria for the modalities. Owing to the low response rate, we caution against generalising these findings across the SCI pain management field.</p>","PeriodicalId":44180,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain after spinal cord injury (SCI) is common, and physiotherapy plays a pivotal role in alleviating pain for people with SCI.

Objective: To determine the modalities that physiotherapists in South Africa use to treat SCI-related pain and the factors that guide the selection of treatment modalities.

Method: A quantitative, cross-sectional design using a self-developed online survey was distributed to physiotherapists belonging to the South African Society of Physiotherapy and the Physiotherapy Association of South Africa. Data were analysed using SPSS v26, where descriptive data were analysed using frequency, percentages, means and standard deviations, and Fisher's exact tests for inferential analyses. Open-ended questions underwent thematic analysis.

Results: Forty-six responses were received. The most-used modalities were transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (29.8%), exercises (27.7%) and joint mobilisations (29.8%). Most physiotherapists used standardised measurements to objectively assess pain characteristics, with the visual analog scale being the most used (70.2%). Except for the cost of treatment, the factors that guided the selection of the modalities included the pain type, onset, duration, location and intensity, pain interference, duration of treatment, patient's preferences, other treatments that the patient was receiving for pain and psychosocial factors (87.2%).

Conclusions: Local physiotherapists use pain management modalities that are supported by the evidence to treat SCI-related pain.

Clinical implications: This study highlights the common modalities used by physiotherapists to treat SCI-related pain, as well as the selection criteria for the modalities. Owing to the low response rate, we caution against generalising these findings across the SCI pain management field.

Abstract Image

确定南非物理治疗师对脊髓损伤患者疼痛的管理。
背景:脊髓损伤(SCI)后疼痛是常见的,物理治疗在减轻SCI患者疼痛中起着关键作用。目的:确定南非物理治疗师用于治疗sci相关疼痛的方式以及指导选择治疗方式的因素。方法:采用自行开发的在线调查,对属于南非物理治疗学会和南非物理治疗协会的物理治疗师进行定量、横断面设计。使用SPSS v26对数据进行分析,其中使用频率、百分比、平均值和标准差对描述性数据进行分析,并使用Fisher精确检验进行推论分析。对开放式问题进行专题分析。结果:共收到回复46份。最常用的治疗方式是经皮神经电刺激(29.8%)、运动(27.7%)和关节活动(29.8%)。大多数物理治疗师使用标准化测量来客观评估疼痛特征,其中视觉模拟量表使用最多(70.2%)。除治疗费用外,指导选择治疗方式的因素包括疼痛类型、发作、持续时间、部位和强度、疼痛干扰、治疗持续时间、患者偏好、患者正在接受的其他治疗方法和心理社会因素(87.2%)。结论:当地物理治疗师使用有证据支持的疼痛管理方式来治疗sci相关疼痛。临床意义:本研究强调了物理治疗师治疗sci相关疼痛的常用模式,以及模式的选择标准。由于反应率低,我们警告不要将这些发现推广到整个SCI疼痛管理领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信