Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia with or without Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Intercostal Nerve Blocks in Children Undergoing the Nuss Procedure: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Trial.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2022-07-22 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/5776833
Bingjie Ma, Yuan Sun, Can Hao, Xiaoming Liu, Sai'e Shen
{"title":"Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia with or without Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Intercostal Nerve Blocks in Children Undergoing the Nuss Procedure: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Trial.","authors":"Bingjie Ma,&nbsp;Yuan Sun,&nbsp;Can Hao,&nbsp;Xiaoming Liu,&nbsp;Sai'e Shen","doi":"10.1155/2022/5776833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two analgesic strategies have been described for pain treatment after the pectus excavatum surgery: the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) and ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block. In this prospective, randomized and double-blinded trial and the short and long-term outcomes were compared in patients after surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The children were randomized to either the intercostal or control group. Ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block was with 0.25% ropivacaine and 5 mg dexamethasone in the intercostal group, while the control group was with 0.9% normal saline. The block was performed in the intercostal space corresponding to the lowest depression of the sternum and repeated bilaterally in the spaces above and below. Postoperatively, the children in the two-groups received PCIA with fentanyl for 48 hours. The primary outcome was a pain score on the postoperative day 1, as measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty children undergoing the Nuss procedure were enrolled in the trial. The mean differences in VAS scores between the two groups were 3.2 in the PACU (<i>p</i> < 0.001), 1.7 on postoperative day 1 (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and 0.7 on postoperative day 2 (<i>p</i>=0.015). The opioid consumption was significantly lower in the intercostal group during the postoperative 48 hours (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The anxiety and QOL scores in the intercostal group were significantly improved on some points of time (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The incidence of adverse events was markedly lower in the intercostal group during the postoperative 48 hours (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block with PCIA may be more effective than PCIA alone in children who underwent the Nuss procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9337970/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5776833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Two analgesic strategies have been described for pain treatment after the pectus excavatum surgery: the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) and ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block. In this prospective, randomized and double-blinded trial and the short and long-term outcomes were compared in patients after surgery.

Methods: The children were randomized to either the intercostal or control group. Ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block was with 0.25% ropivacaine and 5 mg dexamethasone in the intercostal group, while the control group was with 0.9% normal saline. The block was performed in the intercostal space corresponding to the lowest depression of the sternum and repeated bilaterally in the spaces above and below. Postoperatively, the children in the two-groups received PCIA with fentanyl for 48 hours. The primary outcome was a pain score on the postoperative day 1, as measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

Results: Sixty children undergoing the Nuss procedure were enrolled in the trial. The mean differences in VAS scores between the two groups were 3.2 in the PACU (p < 0.001), 1.7 on postoperative day 1 (p < 0.001) and 0.7 on postoperative day 2 (p=0.015). The opioid consumption was significantly lower in the intercostal group during the postoperative 48 hours (p < 0.05). The anxiety and QOL scores in the intercostal group were significantly improved on some points of time (p < 0.05). The incidence of adverse events was markedly lower in the intercostal group during the postoperative 48 hours (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Our results suggest ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block with PCIA may be more effective than PCIA alone in children who underwent the Nuss procedure.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

超声引导下双侧肋间神经阻滞对接受Nuss手术的儿童的患者控制静脉镇痛:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。
背景:对于漏斗胸手术后疼痛的治疗,已有两种镇痛策略:患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)和超声引导下肋间神经阻滞。在这项前瞻性、随机和双盲试验中,比较了手术后患者的短期和长期结果。方法:将患儿随机分为肋间组和对照组。超声引导肋间神经阻滞组采用0.25%罗哌卡因+ 5 mg地塞米松,对照组采用0.9%生理盐水。在胸骨最低凹陷处的肋间隙进行阻滞,并在上下间隙双侧重复阻滞。术后两组患儿给予芬太尼PCIA治疗48小时。主要结果是术后第1天的疼痛评分,由视觉模拟评分(VAS)测量。结果:60名接受Nuss手术的儿童入组试验。PACU组VAS评分平均差异为3.2分(p < 0.001),术后第1天为1.7分(p < 0.001),术后第2天为0.7分(p=0.015)。术后48小时肋间组阿片类药物用量明显降低(p < 0.05)。肋间组焦虑和生活质量评分在部分时间点有明显改善(p < 0.05)。肋间组术后48小时不良事件发生率明显低于肋间组(p < 0.05)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,超声引导下的肋间神经阻滞联合PCIA可能比单独使用PCIA对接受Nuss手术的儿童更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信