Bryony Insua-Summerhays, Becca Knowles Bevis, Professor Jane Barlow
{"title":"What tools should be used to identify women in need of additional support in pregnancy?","authors":"Bryony Insua-Summerhays, Becca Knowles Bevis, Professor Jane Barlow","doi":"10.1080/02646838.2022.2103525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify and inform recommendation of self-report and interview-based instruments that are feasible, reliable and valid to evaluate the quality of the maternal-fetal relationship (MFR).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Several constructs predicting parent-infant interaction and later infant adjustment are used to assess mothers' thoughts and feelings towards their unborn baby, including reflective functioning, mind-mindedness, representation, and fetal attachment. As yet, there is no existing review comparing the quality and accessibility of instruments across each of these constructs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was undertaken to synthesise psychometric information on measures reporting on the MFR. Searches of six databases were conducted. English articles were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The QATSDD checklist was used to assess study quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of 669 studies identified, 28 met inclusion criteria. Thirteen different instruments were identified for evaluation. Reported reliability and validity varied significantly across instruments, as well as availability for research and/or clinical use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Suggestions for research and clinical practice include further evaluation of the psychometric properties of tools, particularly for self-report measures of reflective functioning, use of interviews to scaffold reflexivity, and development of clinical policies and procedures to clarify care pathways for expectant mothers needing further support.</p>","PeriodicalId":47721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2022.2103525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to identify and inform recommendation of self-report and interview-based instruments that are feasible, reliable and valid to evaluate the quality of the maternal-fetal relationship (MFR).
Background: Several constructs predicting parent-infant interaction and later infant adjustment are used to assess mothers' thoughts and feelings towards their unborn baby, including reflective functioning, mind-mindedness, representation, and fetal attachment. As yet, there is no existing review comparing the quality and accessibility of instruments across each of these constructs.
Methods: A systematic literature review was undertaken to synthesise psychometric information on measures reporting on the MFR. Searches of six databases were conducted. English articles were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The QATSDD checklist was used to assess study quality.
Results: Of 669 studies identified, 28 met inclusion criteria. Thirteen different instruments were identified for evaluation. Reported reliability and validity varied significantly across instruments, as well as availability for research and/or clinical use.
Conclusion: Suggestions for research and clinical practice include further evaluation of the psychometric properties of tools, particularly for self-report measures of reflective functioning, use of interviews to scaffold reflexivity, and development of clinical policies and procedures to clarify care pathways for expectant mothers needing further support.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology reports and reviews outstanding research on psychological, behavioural, medical and social aspects of human reproduction, pregnancy and infancy. Medical topics focus on obstetrics and gynaecology, paediatrics and psychiatry. The growing work in relevant aspects of medical communication and medical sociology are also covered. Relevant psychological work includes developmental psychology, clinical psychology, social psychology, behavioural medicine, psychology of women and health psychology. Research into psychological aspects of midwifery, health visiting and nursing is central to the interests of the Journal. The Journal is of special value to those concerned with interdisciplinary issues. As a result, the Journal is of particular interest to those concerned with fundamental processes in behaviour and to issues of health promotion and service organization.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
