Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for accurate diagnosis and management of lower respiratory tract infections.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in patients with suspected lower respiratory tract infections.

Methods: This retrospective study reviewed patients with suspected lower respiratory tract infections at the Wuhan Union Hospital. Data including demographic, laboratory, and radiological profiles; treatment; and outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

Results: mNGS identified pathogenic microbes in 100/140 (71.4%) patients, although 135 (96.4%) had received empiric antibiotic treatment before the mNGS tests. Single bacterial infection (35/100, 35%) was the most common type of infection in patients with positive mNGS results, followed by single fungal infection (14/100, 14%), bacterial-viral coinfection (14/100, 14%), single viral infection (12/100, 12%), bacterial-fungal coinfection (9/100, 9%), fungal-viral coinfection (9/100, 9%), and bacterial-fungal-viral coinfection (7/100, 7%). Moreover, compared with culture test, mNGS showed higher sensitivity (63/85, 74.1% vs 22/85, 25.9% P = 0.001) and lower processing time (24 hours vs 48 hours). Antibiotic treatment was adjusted or confirmed based on the mNGS results in 123 (87.9%) patients, including five (3.6%), 33 (23.6%), and 85 (60.7%) patients, in whom treatment was downgraded, upgraded, and unchanged, respectively. Almost all patients, regardless of escalation, de-escalation, or no change in treatment, showed significant improvement in clinical symptoms and inflammatory indicators. In addition, 17 (12.1%) patients were referred to Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital for further treatment because of confirmed or suspected tuberculosis.

Conclusion: mNGS could be a promising technique for microbiological diagnosis and antibiotic management, potentially improving outcomes for patients.