{"title":"A sting in the tail: An embedded stingray spine in a mid-1st millennium AD adult male skeleton from Rebun Island, Hokkaido, Japan","authors":"Rick J. Schulting , Daisuke Kubo , Kiyonori Nishida , Izumi Braddick , Minoru Yoneda , Hirofumi Kato , Hajime Ishida","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpp.2022.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We report here a stingray spine (Dasyatidae) found embedded in the femur of a male skeleton from the archaeological site of Uedomari-5, Rebun Island, Hokkaido, Japan.</p></div><div><h3>Materials</h3><p>A single well-preserved but incomplete human skeleton.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Macroscopic observation and low power magnification, CT imaging, radiocarbon dating and stable isotope (carbon, nitrogen) analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The stingray spine is tentatively identified as <em>Bathytoshia brevicaudata</em>. CT imaging shows no healing, indicating that death occurred shortly afterwards. The skeleton has been directly radiocarbon dated to the Okhotsk period (cal AD 429–827), with <em>δ</em><sup>13</sup>C (−13.7‰) and <em>δ</em><sup>15</sup>N (19.3‰) values indicating a diet focused on marine foods.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The absence of healing in what would have been a non-lethal injury strongly suggests that the spine tipped an arrowhead, rather than being the result of an accidental encounter with a living stingray. It is possible that the injury reflects a period of increased conflict coinciding with, or following on from, the expansion of the Okhotsk culture from Sakhalin into northern Hokkaido.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>Uedomari-5 provides the first example, to our knowledge, of a stingray spine directly embedded in human bone at an archaeological site. More widely, the finding contributes to our knowledge of conflict in northern hunter-gatherer communities.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Given the early excavation date (1949–50), there is little contextual information available for the burials.</p></div><div><h3>Suggestions for further research</h3><p>ZooMS (Zooarchaeology by Mass Spectrometry) may be able to identify the stingray species. Archival research may provide more information concerning the excavations at Uedomari-5.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48817,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Paleopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879981722000353/pdfft?md5=bef701c17570e2c00fd7f1be46198f0a&pid=1-s2.0-S1879981722000353-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Paleopathology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879981722000353","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
We report here a stingray spine (Dasyatidae) found embedded in the femur of a male skeleton from the archaeological site of Uedomari-5, Rebun Island, Hokkaido, Japan.
Materials
A single well-preserved but incomplete human skeleton.
Methods
Macroscopic observation and low power magnification, CT imaging, radiocarbon dating and stable isotope (carbon, nitrogen) analysis.
Results
The stingray spine is tentatively identified as Bathytoshia brevicaudata. CT imaging shows no healing, indicating that death occurred shortly afterwards. The skeleton has been directly radiocarbon dated to the Okhotsk period (cal AD 429–827), with δ13C (−13.7‰) and δ15N (19.3‰) values indicating a diet focused on marine foods.
Conclusions
The absence of healing in what would have been a non-lethal injury strongly suggests that the spine tipped an arrowhead, rather than being the result of an accidental encounter with a living stingray. It is possible that the injury reflects a period of increased conflict coinciding with, or following on from, the expansion of the Okhotsk culture from Sakhalin into northern Hokkaido.
Significance
Uedomari-5 provides the first example, to our knowledge, of a stingray spine directly embedded in human bone at an archaeological site. More widely, the finding contributes to our knowledge of conflict in northern hunter-gatherer communities.
Limitations
Given the early excavation date (1949–50), there is little contextual information available for the burials.
Suggestions for further research
ZooMS (Zooarchaeology by Mass Spectrometry) may be able to identify the stingray species. Archival research may provide more information concerning the excavations at Uedomari-5.
目的报道在日本北海道热汶岛上岛5号考古遗址发现的一具男性骨骼股骨内嵌的黄貂鱼脊柱(黄貂鱼科)。一具保存完好但不完整的人类骨骼。方法显微镜观察、低倍放大、CT成像、放射性碳定年及稳定同位素(碳、氮)分析。结果黄貂鱼脊椎初步鉴定为浅尾鱼(Bathytoshia brevicaudata)。CT图像显示未愈合,表明不久后死亡。经放射性碳直接测定,该骨架的年代为鄂霍次克时期(公元429-827年),δ13C(- 13.7‰)和δ15N(19.3‰)值表明其饮食以海洋食物为主。结论:这个非致命的伤口没有愈合,这有力地表明,脊椎的尖端是一个箭头,而不是意外遭遇活黄貂鱼的结果。这可能反映了与鄂霍次克文化从库页岛向北海道北部扩张同时或随后增加的冲突时期。据我们所知,edomari-5提供了在考古遗址中直接嵌入人类骨骼的黄貂鱼脊椎的第一个例子。更广泛地说,这一发现有助于我们了解北方狩猎采集者社区的冲突。局限性:由于发掘时间较早(1949 - 1950年),关于墓葬的背景信息很少。对进一步研究的建议zooms (Zooarchaeology by Mass Spectrometry)可能能够鉴别黄貂鱼的种类。档案研究可能会提供更多有关Uedomari-5发掘的信息。
期刊介绍:
Paleopathology is the study and application of methods and techniques for investigating diseases and related conditions from skeletal and soft tissue remains. The International Journal of Paleopathology (IJPP) will publish original and significant articles on human and animal (including hominids) disease, based upon the study of physical remains, including osseous, dental, and preserved soft tissues at a range of methodological levels, from direct observation to molecular, chemical, histological and radiographic analysis. Discussion of ways in which these methods can be applied to the reconstruction of health, disease and life histories in the past is central to the discipline, so the journal would also encourage papers covering interpretive and theoretical issues, and those that place the study of disease at the centre of a bioarchaeological or biocultural approach. Papers dealing with historical evidence relating to disease in the past (rather than history of medicine) will also be published. The journal will also accept significant studies that applied previously developed techniques to new materials, setting the research in the context of current debates on past human and animal health.