The Impact of ASCITIC Paracentesis on Symptomatic Outcomes in Palliative Patients: 3-Year Experience of a Melbourne Inpatient Palliative Care Unit Using Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration Assessments.
{"title":"The Impact of ASCITIC Paracentesis on Symptomatic Outcomes in Palliative Patients: 3-Year Experience of a Melbourne Inpatient Palliative Care Unit Using Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration Assessments.","authors":"Kiran Iyer, Lucy Kernick","doi":"10.1155/2022/7300110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ascites formation is a common occurrence in patients receiving palliative care. This is associated with symptoms that may respond to drainage.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To review and quantify ascites-related symptoms pre- and post-paracentesis to evaluate its benefit in an inpatient palliative care setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective audit of patients admitted to an inpatient palliative care unit who underwent paracentesis between November 2016 to June 2020 was performed. The primary outcome was a symptomatic benefit of paracentesis. Secondary outcomes assessed the associated complications as well as the alterations to functional status. Data were analysed using a paired <i>T</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>43 instances of ascitic paracentesis were performed on a total of 26 patients. Three patients were excluded from the study due to the technical failure of their paracentesis procedure. There was a mean 0.16-point reduction in pain (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.33 to 0.65), a mean 0.03-point increase in dyspnoea (95% CI -0.51 to 0.46), and a mean 0.32-point reduction in nausea (95% CI -0.09 to 0.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ascitic paracentesis in the palliative setting may demonstrate some benefit in managing symptoms associated with ascites. Although the findings of this study did not achieve statistical significance, these results may be substantiated by future studies with larger sample size.</p>","PeriodicalId":12597,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"7300110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9584715/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7300110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: Ascites formation is a common occurrence in patients receiving palliative care. This is associated with symptoms that may respond to drainage.
Aim: To review and quantify ascites-related symptoms pre- and post-paracentesis to evaluate its benefit in an inpatient palliative care setting.
Methods: A retrospective audit of patients admitted to an inpatient palliative care unit who underwent paracentesis between November 2016 to June 2020 was performed. The primary outcome was a symptomatic benefit of paracentesis. Secondary outcomes assessed the associated complications as well as the alterations to functional status. Data were analysed using a paired T-test.
Results: 43 instances of ascitic paracentesis were performed on a total of 26 patients. Three patients were excluded from the study due to the technical failure of their paracentesis procedure. There was a mean 0.16-point reduction in pain (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.33 to 0.65), a mean 0.03-point increase in dyspnoea (95% CI -0.51 to 0.46), and a mean 0.32-point reduction in nausea (95% CI -0.09 to 0.74).
Conclusions: Ascitic paracentesis in the palliative setting may demonstrate some benefit in managing symptoms associated with ascites. Although the findings of this study did not achieve statistical significance, these results may be substantiated by future studies with larger sample size.
背景:腹水形成在接受姑息治疗的患者中很常见。这与可能对引流有反应的症状有关。目的:回顾和量化穿刺前后腹水相关症状,以评估其在住院姑息治疗环境中的益处。方法:对2016年11月至2020年6月期间入住姑息治疗病房接受穿刺术的患者进行回顾性审计。主要结果是穿刺后的症状性获益。次要结果评估相关并发症以及功能状态的改变。数据分析采用配对t检验。结果:共对26例患者行腹水穿刺43例。三名患者因穿刺技术失败而被排除在研究之外。疼痛平均减少0.16点(95%可信区间(CI) -0.33至0.65),呼吸困难平均增加0.03点(95% CI -0.51至0.46),恶心平均减少0.32点(95% CI -0.09至0.74)。结论:姑息环境下的腹水穿刺可能在管理与腹水相关的症状方面显示出一些益处。虽然本研究的结果没有达到统计学意义,但这些结果可能会在未来更大样本量的研究中得到证实。
期刊介绍:
Gastroenterology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal which publishes original research articles, review articles and clinical studies based on all areas of gastroenterology, hepatology, pancreas and biliary, and related cancers. The journal welcomes submissions on the physiology, pathophysiology, etiology, diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal diseases. The aim of the journal is to provide cutting edge research related to the field of gastroenterology, as well as digestive diseases and disorders.
Topics of interest include:
Management of pancreatic diseases
Third space endoscopy
Endoscopic resection
Therapeutic endoscopy
Therapeutic endosonography.