Noninferiority of Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Casirivimab/Imdevimab for Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 in a Real-World Setting.

Q3 Medicine
Alex Belote, Sharon Reece, Samantha Robinson, Hanna Jensen, Sheena CarlLee, Megan Clark, Spencer Parnell, Caroline Geels, James Newton
{"title":"Noninferiority of Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Casirivimab/Imdevimab for Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 in a Real-World Setting.","authors":"Alex Belote,&nbsp;Sharon Reece,&nbsp;Samantha Robinson,&nbsp;Hanna Jensen,&nbsp;Sheena CarlLee,&nbsp;Megan Clark,&nbsp;Spencer Parnell,&nbsp;Caroline Geels,&nbsp;James Newton","doi":"10.1089/mab.2022.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy has emerged as one of the mainstay treatment options for SARS-CoV-2. To improve speed of delivery and decrease bedside nursing needs, subcutaneous (SC) delivery of mAbs has been explored as an alternative to standard intravenous (IV) administration. To date, data regarding the effectiveness of SC compared with IV mAb are lacking. This retrospective cohort analysis conducted between April 2021 and August 2021 compared hospitalization rates among patients receiving IV versus SC administration of casirivimab/imdevimab (Regen-COV) at a single institution in Arkansas. Casirivimab/imdevimab was a promising mAb therapy utilized during the height of the Delta variant surge of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Before resistance developed by the Omicron variant, casirivimab/imdevimab was utilized for outpatient treatment of SARS-CoV-2 patients at risk of deterioration. Primary outcomes of this investigation were the 30-day post-treatment rate of hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) care during hospitalization. There was no increased risk of hospitalization or ICU care with SC administration compared with IV administration. As SARS-CoV-2 continues to mutate into variants such as Omicron and develop resistance to existing mAbs, these preliminary findings of noninferiority of SC versus IV warrant ongoing investigation into SC administration of other mAbs.</p>","PeriodicalId":53514,"journal":{"name":"Monoclonal Antibodies in Immunodiagnosis and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monoclonal Antibodies in Immunodiagnosis and Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/mab.2022.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy has emerged as one of the mainstay treatment options for SARS-CoV-2. To improve speed of delivery and decrease bedside nursing needs, subcutaneous (SC) delivery of mAbs has been explored as an alternative to standard intravenous (IV) administration. To date, data regarding the effectiveness of SC compared with IV mAb are lacking. This retrospective cohort analysis conducted between April 2021 and August 2021 compared hospitalization rates among patients receiving IV versus SC administration of casirivimab/imdevimab (Regen-COV) at a single institution in Arkansas. Casirivimab/imdevimab was a promising mAb therapy utilized during the height of the Delta variant surge of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Before resistance developed by the Omicron variant, casirivimab/imdevimab was utilized for outpatient treatment of SARS-CoV-2 patients at risk of deterioration. Primary outcomes of this investigation were the 30-day post-treatment rate of hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) care during hospitalization. There was no increased risk of hospitalization or ICU care with SC administration compared with IV administration. As SARS-CoV-2 continues to mutate into variants such as Omicron and develop resistance to existing mAbs, these preliminary findings of noninferiority of SC versus IV warrant ongoing investigation into SC administration of other mAbs.

在现实世界中,门诊治疗SARS-CoV-2的非劣效性:皮下注射与静脉注射卡西瑞维单抗/伊姆德维单抗
单克隆抗体(mAb)治疗已成为SARS-CoV-2的主要治疗方案之一。为了提高给药速度和减少床边护理需求,单克隆抗体的皮下(SC)给药已被探索作为标准静脉(IV)给药的替代方案。迄今为止,缺乏关于SC与IV mAb的有效性的数据。这项于2021年4月至2021年8月进行的回顾性队列分析比较了在阿肯色州一家机构接受静脉注射和SC给药卡西维单抗/imdevimab (regencov)的患者的住院率。Casirivimab/imdevimab是一种很有前景的单抗疗法,在SARS-CoV-2大流行的Delta变体激增高峰期间使用。在欧米克隆变异产生耐药性之前,卡西维单抗/伊姆德维单抗被用于有恶化风险的SARS-CoV-2患者的门诊治疗。本研究的主要结局是治疗后30天的住院率和住院期间的重症监护病房(ICU)护理。与静脉给药相比,SC给药没有增加住院或ICU护理的风险。随着SARS-CoV-2继续变异为Omicron等变体并对现有单克隆抗体产生耐药性,SC与IV的这些初步发现值得对SC给药其他单克隆抗体进行持续研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信