Clinical outcomes after implantation of extended depth-of-focus AcrySof® Vivity® intraocular lens in eyes with low-grade epiretinal membrane.

Sohee Jeon, Ayoung Choi, Hyunggoo Kwon
{"title":"Clinical outcomes after implantation of extended depth-of-focus AcrySof® Vivity® intraocular lens in eyes with low-grade epiretinal membrane.","authors":"Sohee Jeon,&nbsp;Ayoung Choi,&nbsp;Hyunggoo Kwon","doi":"10.1007/s00417-022-05751-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical outcomes of extended depth-of-focus (EDoF) AcrySof® Vivity® intraocular lens in eyes with low-grade epiretinal membrane (ERM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-five eyes with low-grade ERM and history of Vivity implantation were compared with 50 age-matched controls with Vivity implantation and no ERM. Eyes with ERM showing widening of the outer nuclear layer and loss of the foveal depression, but no ectopic inner foveal layer or outer retinal defect were eligible. Corrected and uncorrected distant visual acuity (CDVA and UDVA), uncorrected intermediate and near visual acuity (UIVA and UNVA), contrast sensitivity detected by area under the log contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF), Strehl ratio, area ratio, and occurrence of dysphotopsia were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>UDVA and CDVA were similar between groups (UDVA: 0.01 ± 0.05 vs 0.03 ± 0.06, P = 0.154; CDVA: 0.00 ± 0.00 vs 0.00 ± 0.02, P = 0.125). UIVA and mesopic AULCSF were significantly worse in eyes with ERM compared to those with no ERM (UIVA: 0.09 ± 0.09 vs 0.14 ± 0.10, P = 0.028; mesopic AULCSF: 1.26 ± 0.15 vs 1.17 ± 0.10, P = 0.013). The occurrence of dysphotopsia was similar in both groups (glare: P = 0.465; halo: P = 0.218; starburst: P = 0.457).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Eyes with low-grade ERM showed comparable outcomes to eyes without ERM after Vivity IOL implantation. Implantation of this newly developed EDoF IOL with low addition can be of benefit to eyes with low-grade, reversible ERM that is limited to the inner retina.</p>","PeriodicalId":520634,"journal":{"name":"Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie","volume":" ","pages":"3883-3888"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05751-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of extended depth-of-focus (EDoF) AcrySof® Vivity® intraocular lens in eyes with low-grade epiretinal membrane (ERM).

Methods: Forty-five eyes with low-grade ERM and history of Vivity implantation were compared with 50 age-matched controls with Vivity implantation and no ERM. Eyes with ERM showing widening of the outer nuclear layer and loss of the foveal depression, but no ectopic inner foveal layer or outer retinal defect were eligible. Corrected and uncorrected distant visual acuity (CDVA and UDVA), uncorrected intermediate and near visual acuity (UIVA and UNVA), contrast sensitivity detected by area under the log contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF), Strehl ratio, area ratio, and occurrence of dysphotopsia were compared between groups.

Results: UDVA and CDVA were similar between groups (UDVA: 0.01 ± 0.05 vs 0.03 ± 0.06, P = 0.154; CDVA: 0.00 ± 0.00 vs 0.00 ± 0.02, P = 0.125). UIVA and mesopic AULCSF were significantly worse in eyes with ERM compared to those with no ERM (UIVA: 0.09 ± 0.09 vs 0.14 ± 0.10, P = 0.028; mesopic AULCSF: 1.26 ± 0.15 vs 1.17 ± 0.10, P = 0.013). The occurrence of dysphotopsia was similar in both groups (glare: P = 0.465; halo: P = 0.218; starburst: P = 0.457).

Discussion: Eyes with low-grade ERM showed comparable outcomes to eyes without ERM after Vivity IOL implantation. Implantation of this newly developed EDoF IOL with low addition can be of benefit to eyes with low-grade, reversible ERM that is limited to the inner retina.

AcrySof®Vivity®人工晶体植入术治疗低分级视网膜前膜患者的临床疗效
目的:评价AcrySof®Vivity®人工晶状体在低级别视网膜前膜(ERM)患者中的临床效果。方法:将45只低级别ERM和有过Vivity植入术史的眼与50只年龄匹配的对照组进行比较。ERM显示外核层变宽和中央凹凹陷丧失,但没有内中央凹层异位或外视网膜缺损的眼睛是合格的。比较两组矫正和未矫正的远视敏锐度(CDVA和UDVA)、未矫正的中近视敏锐度(UIVA和UNVA)、对数对比敏感度函数下面积检测的对比敏感度(AULCSF)、Strehl比、面积比、光照不良发生率。结果:UDVA、CDVA组间差异无统计学意义(UDVA: 0.01±0.05 vs 0.03±0.06,P = 0.154;CDVA: 0.00±0.00 vs 0.00±0.02,P = 0.125)。与无ERM组相比,有ERM组的UIVA和介观AULCSF明显更差(UIVA: 0.09±0.09 vs 0.14±0.10,P = 0.028;中光AULCSF: 1.26±0.15 vs 1.17±0.10,P = 0.013)。两组患者的注视障碍发生率相似(眩:P = 0.465;光晕:P = 0.218;starburst: P = 0.457)。讨论:活体人工晶体植入术后,低级别ERM眼与无ERM眼的结果相当。这种新开发的低添加的EDoF IOL的植入可以有利于低级别,可逆性ERM仅限于内视网膜的眼睛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信